NCT04783441

Brief Summary

The investigators want to study the impact CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) has on patients glycemic control as determined by time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) in the Diabetic Kidney Transplant population.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Jun 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress88%
Jun 2021Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 29, 2021

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)

    1\) Time in Range: Number of minutes per day or percentage of time that glucose levels are in low (BG\<70), target (BG 70-180), high (BG \>180) or very high (BG\>250) ranges.

    70 days

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Glycemic variability

    70 days

  • CGM satisfaction questionnaire (10 questions)

    up to 70 days

  • Adherence to Diabetic Diet

    up to 70 days

  • Incidence of all-cause emergency room utilization and rehospitalizations

    70 days

  • Incidence of post-transplant infections during study period

    70 days

Other Outcomes (1)

  • safety endpoint Hypoglycemia

    70 days

Study Arms (2)

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Those in the intervention arm will wear a continuous glucose monitoring device. They only need to perform blood glucose fingersticks if the CGM transmission is lost for a prolonged period of time or in cases of hypo- or hyperglycemia when symptoms don't align with blood glucose readings.

Device: Dexcom G6

Self monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The control arm will remain on standard-of-care SMBG while the intervention arm will use their CGM. The control arm utilizing SMBG will be required to have at minimum 4 glucose checks per day.

Device: Dexcom G6 blinded sensor

Interventions

Dexcom G6DEVICE

access to continuous glucose monitoring in the Dexcom G6 arm 24/7

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

retrospective access to continuous glucose profile after 10 days of wear

Self monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or above
  • Received a kidney transplant within the past year with functioning kidney (eGFR \> 30 mL/min
  • Person with Type 2 Diabetes and on insulin
  • Access to home wi-fi connection

You may not qualify if:

  • Person with Type 1 Diabetes
  • Patients taking hydroxyurea
  • Patient unable to wear the Dexcom G6 device at all times for any reason
  • Must be able to test blood glucose with meter 4x a day when on blinded CGM.
  • Presence of clinically significant visual or cognitive impairment
  • Illiterate
  • Prisoners
  • Women who are pregnant, who plan to become pregnant during the course of the study, or who are breastfeeding
  • Presence of clinically unstable cardiovascular disease
  • Active malignancy treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UC Davis Health

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Haller S, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Price D, Aronoff S, Aronson R, Toschi E, Kollman C, Bergenstal R; DIAMOND Study Group. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):365-374. doi: 10.7326/M16-2855. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

    PMID: 28828487BACKGROUND
  • Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.

    PMID: 28118453BACKGROUND
  • Olafsdottir AF, Polonsky W, Bolinder J, Hirsch IB, Dahlqvist S, Wedel H, Nystrom T, Wijkman M, Schwarcz E, Hellman J, Heise T, Lind M. A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Nocturnal Hypoglycemia, Daytime Hypoglycemia, Glycemic Variability, and Hypoglycemia Confidence in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections (GOLD-3). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Apr;20(4):274-284. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0363. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

    PMID: 29608107BACKGROUND
  • Edelman SV, Argento NB, Pettus J, Hirsch IB. Clinical Implications of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov;41(11):2265-2274. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1150.

    PMID: 30348844BACKGROUND
  • Saisho Y. Use of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Diabetes Care: Importance of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 9;15(5):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050947.

    PMID: 29747423BACKGROUND
  • Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bush MA, DeFronzo RA, Garber JR, Garvey WT, Hirsch IB, Jellinger PS, McGill JB, Mechanick JI, Perreault L, Rosenblit PD, Samson S, Umpierrez GE. CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139. doi: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32022600BACKGROUND
  • American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.

    PMID: 31862752BACKGROUND
  • Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

    PMID: 31177185BACKGROUND
  • Longo R, Sperling S. Personal Versus Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring: When to Use Which on Whom. Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Aug;32(3):183-193. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0093.

    PMID: 31462872BACKGROUND
  • American Diabetes Association. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.

    PMID: 31862750BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ling Chen, MD

    UCDavis Transplant Nephrology

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Dahlia Zuidema, PharmD

CONTACT

Clinical Research Coordinators

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: We propose a single-center, prospective, randomized study comprising 2 study arms. They will be randomized in a stratified fashion. Stratification will be according to whether or not they are on prednisone and their estimated glomerular filtration rate. This is to ensure that both arms are populated by equal numbers of patients with prednisone and with worse renal function
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2021

First Posted

March 5, 2021

Study Start

June 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations