Use of CGM in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to Improve Glycemic Control in Kidney Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators want to study the impact CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) has on patients glycemic control as determined by time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) in the Diabetic Kidney Transplant population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
January 29, 2026
January 1, 2026
5.5 years
March 1, 2021
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
1\) Time in Range: Number of minutes per day or percentage of time that glucose levels are in low (BG\<70), target (BG 70-180), high (BG \>180) or very high (BG\>250) ranges.
70 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Glycemic variability
70 days
CGM satisfaction questionnaire (10 questions)
up to 70 days
Adherence to Diabetic Diet
up to 70 days
Incidence of all-cause emergency room utilization and rehospitalizations
70 days
Incidence of post-transplant infections during study period
70 days
Other Outcomes (1)
safety endpoint Hypoglycemia
70 days
Study Arms (2)
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThose in the intervention arm will wear a continuous glucose monitoring device. They only need to perform blood glucose fingersticks if the CGM transmission is lost for a prolonged period of time or in cases of hypo- or hyperglycemia when symptoms don't align with blood glucose readings.
Self monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks)
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control arm will remain on standard-of-care SMBG while the intervention arm will use their CGM. The control arm utilizing SMBG will be required to have at minimum 4 glucose checks per day.
Interventions
access to continuous glucose monitoring in the Dexcom G6 arm 24/7
retrospective access to continuous glucose profile after 10 days of wear
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or above
- Received a kidney transplant within the past year with functioning kidney (eGFR \> 30 mL/min
- Person with Type 2 Diabetes and on insulin
- Access to home wi-fi connection
You may not qualify if:
- Person with Type 1 Diabetes
- Patients taking hydroxyurea
- Patient unable to wear the Dexcom G6 device at all times for any reason
- Must be able to test blood glucose with meter 4x a day when on blinded CGM.
- Presence of clinically significant visual or cognitive impairment
- Illiterate
- Prisoners
- Women who are pregnant, who plan to become pregnant during the course of the study, or who are breastfeeding
- Presence of clinically unstable cardiovascular disease
- Active malignancy treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Davislead
- DexCom, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Related Publications (10)
Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Haller S, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Price D, Aronoff S, Aronson R, Toschi E, Kollman C, Bergenstal R; DIAMOND Study Group. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):365-374. doi: 10.7326/M16-2855. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
PMID: 28828487BACKGROUNDBeck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
PMID: 28118453BACKGROUNDOlafsdottir AF, Polonsky W, Bolinder J, Hirsch IB, Dahlqvist S, Wedel H, Nystrom T, Wijkman M, Schwarcz E, Hellman J, Heise T, Lind M. A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Nocturnal Hypoglycemia, Daytime Hypoglycemia, Glycemic Variability, and Hypoglycemia Confidence in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections (GOLD-3). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Apr;20(4):274-284. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0363. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
PMID: 29608107BACKGROUNDEdelman SV, Argento NB, Pettus J, Hirsch IB. Clinical Implications of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov;41(11):2265-2274. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1150.
PMID: 30348844BACKGROUNDSaisho Y. Use of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Diabetes Care: Importance of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 9;15(5):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050947.
PMID: 29747423BACKGROUNDGarber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bush MA, DeFronzo RA, Garber JR, Garvey WT, Hirsch IB, Jellinger PS, McGill JB, Mechanick JI, Perreault L, Rosenblit PD, Samson S, Umpierrez GE. CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139. doi: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472. No abstract available.
PMID: 32022600BACKGROUNDAmerican Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.
PMID: 31862752BACKGROUNDBattelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
PMID: 31177185BACKGROUNDLongo R, Sperling S. Personal Versus Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring: When to Use Which on Whom. Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Aug;32(3):183-193. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0093.
PMID: 31462872BACKGROUNDAmerican Diabetes Association. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.
PMID: 31862750BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ling Chen, MD
UCDavis Transplant Nephrology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2021
First Posted
March 5, 2021
Study Start
June 29, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share