PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators
PEEK
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients' satisfaction evaluation and radiographic evaluation of the terminal abutments of attachment- retained maxillary obturators with metal framework versus milled PEEK framework in the management of maxillectomy cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2021
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.4 years
February 22, 2021
February 26, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
patient satisfaction 1(change" is being assessed)
The Obturator Functioning Scale ( minimum value is "1"and maximum value is "5"
1 week to 6 months
patient satisfaction 2 (change" is being assessed)
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35 ( minimum value is "1"and maximum value is "5"
1 week to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic evaluation (change" is being assessed)
base line,6 months, 9 months,12 months
Study Arms (3)
conventional obturator
ACTIVE COMPARATORconventional group received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group).
metallic attachment retained obturator
EXPERIMENTALmetal group received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework
PEEk attachment retained obturator
EXPERIMENTALPEEK group received attachment-retained obturators with milled PEEK framework,
Interventions
attachment retained obturator for management of hemi maxillectomy
attachment retained obturator for management of hemi maxillectomy
clasp retained obturator for management of hemi maxillectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient underwent surgical removal of half of maxilla
- participants with a sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \\or class IV Aramany classification) not less than 5 teeth, mouth opening is not less than 25 mm, intact soft palate,
You may not qualify if:
- participants are exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy during last year.
- participant with congenital defect
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Mohamed Sharaf
Cairo, 11625, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Sharaf, lecturer
Beni-Suef University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator,
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2021
First Posted
March 3, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 30, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02