Efficacy of Computer-assisted Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To determine the efficacy of computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the community settings. Study Design: Single-blinded prospective, pre-test/post-test randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in 2 groups of participants that receiving training in community settings. Treatment groups will attend individualized CACR programme using CogniPlus® while control group will continue attend conventional treatment as usual (TAU). Assessment on the means difference in assessing functions will be done after the study. Samples: 80 patients with stable and chronic schizophrenia will be recruited from the community, using a sampling frame of selected diagnosis and homogeneity. Expected Findings: Find out the training effects of selected CACR on EF and daily functioning in patients with schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2022
CompletedMarch 6, 2023
March 1, 2023
1.6 years
February 8, 2021
March 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Score
It is a neuropsychological test that is used to measure high-level cognitive processes as attention, perseverance, working memory, abstract thinking, cognitive flexibility, and set shifting. The test consists of 128 card designs, participant is required to sort the cards under the categorization rules and feedback from examiner in about 20 minutes. The more categories achieved (range 0 to 6) and less perseverative errors (out of 128 trials) the better executive control. Moreover, the lower the total number of trials administered (total number of cards used) reflects greater efficiency of the participant in the task; in addition, the greater the total number of correct responses (number of successes in combinations according to the category) and the lower the total number of errors (number of incorrect combinations) also indicate the better the participant's performance.
Baseline, after completion of half of the programme (an average of 6 weeks), one month post-treatment
Change of The Digit Span Test Score (Digit Span Forward and Digit Span Backward)
It measures a participant's attention and working memory. Forward span captures attention capacity and backward span reflects working memory. The higher both the scores the better functioning. Participant repeats or reverses the digit sequencing after the examiner read out lists of random numbers, extra digit would be added for increased level of difficulty with two trials per level until the participant gives out incorrect answer. Average adult score for forward span is eight to ten and seven to nine for backward span.
Baseline, after completion of half of the programme (an average of 6 weeks), one month post-treatment
Change of Cognitive scores in the cognitive remediation programme CogniPlus®
There are 15 individual training modules that grouped into 6 function dimensions (attention, neglect/visual field training, memory, executive function, spatial processing and visuomotor skills) in this programme. Different number of difficulty levels and specific requirements are structured in different modules. For example, DATEUP module in memory dimension contains 25 levels, incremented with increasing number of stimuli that move in higher speed for the participants to retain and update the information; while ALERT module in attention dimension have 18 difficulty levels, with decreasing maximum permitted reaction time for the participants to respond. For the evaluations of results in all modules, the higher percentage of correct response, the shorter reaction/working time and the higher difficulty level attained indicate the better corresponding functioning. The importance of these cognitive scores is to help tracking the participants' task functioning throughout the study.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Change of Role Functioning Scale
It is a measure of functioning level of adults in four domains: working productivity, independent living/self-care, immediate social network relationships and extended social network relationships. 7-point scale for the four domains and their total score (ranging from 4 to 28) represent the Global Role Functioning Index, the higher scores the better the person's functioning.
Baseline, after completion of half of the programme (an average of 6 weeks), one month post-treatment
Study Arms (2)
CACR Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants of CACR group will attend individual computer-assisted cognitive remediation sessions. Researcher will give instruction in the use of the computerized training programs and assists participants during their training sessions.
TAU Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants of TAU group will attend usual training sessions offered by the training centres with similar intensity and frequency as the CACR training.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia, based on Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.), at chronic and stable state
- Age from 18 to 64
- Regular attendance to rehabilitation training programmes
- Willing and capable to participate and are voluntarily consent to the participation
- Pass the cut-off point of referenced screening tests
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbid differential diagnosis
- History of organic brain disorder
- Complicated conditions that preclude regular attendance of the training
- Currently receiving computer-assisted cognitive remediation and other individual intensive cognitive training
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Man, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2021
First Posted
February 26, 2021
Study Start
April 13, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
November 30, 2022
Last Updated
March 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share