The Treatment Challenges and Limitation in High-Voltage Pediatric Electrical Burn at Rural Area
1 other identifier
observational
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A case of high-voltage pediatric electrical burn involving a fully conscious 13-year old boy who was admitted to the emergency room after being electrocuted by high-voltage power cable, with superficial partial thickness burn over right arm, trunk, and left leg (26% of total body surface area) with cardiac abnormality e.g. tachycardia and non-specific ST depression. Treatments were based on Australian New Zealand Burns Association algorithm with several modifications, i.e. administering lower concentration of oxygen with nasal cannula instead of non-rebreathing mask and intravenous Ketorolac and Metamizole as analgesic instead of morphine due to limitation in infrastructure and knowledge. The patient underwent surgical debridement and strict observation with no signs of abnormality found during hospital stay. Wound dressing consisted of silver sulfadiazine, Sofra-tulle® and dry sterile gauze were used until epithelialization. After the wound healed, the patient resumed wearing elastic bandage and moisturizer on the wound area. The patient was observed daily through 7 days of hospitalization and followed-up for 1 year, achieving normal physiologic function of the affected area but unsatisfactory esthetic result. This case report showed that there is still a lack of burn prevention programs in the rural area, resulted in inadequate first aid application for electrical burn. There is a need for acknowledging and maximizing the implementation of available standardized guidelines e.g. Australian New Zealand Burns Association by giving homogenized training to personnel as well as providing feasible equipment, and then followed by strict monitoring for the patient. The focus of the burn program should also include burn rehabilitation, psychosocial needs and any complaints needing expert opinion in an outpatient setting in addition to adequate burn management for life saving and good wound healing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2021
CompletedMarch 1, 2021
February 1, 2021
1 year
February 24, 2021
February 25, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound healing
The healing rate of burn wound
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Burn Scar
1 year
Eligibility Criteria
Patient with acute electrical burn wound
You may qualify if:
- patient with acute electrical burn wound
You may not qualify if:
- patient does not want to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
S.K.Lerik General Hospital
Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adi Basuki, MD
S.K.Lerik Public Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2021
First Posted
February 26, 2021
Study Start
August 7, 2017
Primary Completion
August 10, 2018
Study Completion
August 10, 2018
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02