Safety and Performance of SWIS in Superficial Wounds
Safety and Performance of SoftOx Wound Irrigation Solution (SWIS) Compared to Normal Saline (NS) in Human Experimental Suction Blister Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an open, evaluator blinded, intra-comparative, randomized, non-inferiority investigation prior to CE mark to confirm safety and performance of the SWIS device when used as intended, i.e. as an irrigation solution for mechanical rinsing of breached or compromised skin as a result from acute wounds.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2021
CompletedOctober 19, 2021
October 1, 2021
4 months
November 23, 2020
October 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Degree (percentage) re-epithelialization in the suction blister wound on day 10 in the SWIS treated wound versus NS treated wound
Measure the degree of re-epithelialization to evaluate any differences between the treatments.
From baseline to day 10
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Degree (percentage) re-epithelialization in the suction blister wound on day 4 in the SWIS treated wound versus NS treated wound.
From baseline to day 4
Percentage of suction blister wounds healed on day 10 in the SWIS treated wound versus NS treated wound
Day 10
Percentage of suction blister wounds healed on day 17 (+/- 1 day) in the SWIS treated wound versus NS treated wound
Day 17
Percentage of suction blister wounds with >30% CFU reduction in the SWIS treated wound and NS treated wound respectively if positive CFU level prior irrigation
Day 4
Subject evaluation of pain during each irrigation procedure on days 0, 2 and 4 in the SWIS treated wound versus NS treated wound
Baseline (day 0), day 2 and day 4
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SoftOx Wound Irrigation Solution (SWIS)
EXPERIMENTALBlister wounds will be irrigated and soaked for 15 minutes.
Normal Saline
ACTIVE COMPARATORBlister wounds will be irrigated and soaked for 15 minutes.
Interventions
Bilateral experimental blister wounds on each forearm. The wound on one arm is rinsed with experimental solution (SWIS) and the contralateral wound on the other arm is rinsed With Saline as a comparator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy and intact skin where the blister suction wounds will be induced
- Been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the clinical investigation
- Voluntarily agreed to participation and has duly signed the Information Consent Form
You may not qualify if:
- Participating in any other clinical investigation
- Disease that may interfere with the wound healing, e.g. diabetes, arterial-, renal-, liver, or cardiac insufficiency, chronic obstructive lung disease, cancer, autoimmune disease, edema of the arm, severe obesity, severe psychiatric disease, dementia or previous known wound healing problems, as judged by the investigator
- Active skin disease, e.g. dermatitis, psoriasis and wounds, and/or tattoos in the areas where suction blister wounds will be induced, as judged by the investigator
- Daily smoker
- Pregnancy
- Systemic immunosuppressive treatment
- Uncontrolled pain that may interfere with the investigation outcome, as judged by the investigator
- Allergy to hypochlorous acid, acetic acid or any other remedies/material used in the clinical investigation
- Not able to read or understand Danish
- Any other conditions that as judged by the investigator may make follow-up or investigation inappropriate
- That according to the Declaration of Helsinki is deemed unsuitable for study enrolment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2020
First Posted
February 25, 2021
Study Start
November 16, 2020
Primary Completion
March 30, 2021
Study Completion
July 20, 2021
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share