Dose the Saline Reduce the Mucus Production When Water Exchange Colonoscopy is Used?
Comparing Left Colon Mucus Production by Water Versus Saline Infusion During Water Exchange Colonoscopy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
301
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study to compare the left colon mucus production between carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation and water exchange (WE) colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be four arms in this study: CO2 insufflation (control group 1), WE with water infusion (control group 2), WE with 50% saline infusion (study group 1), and WE with 25% saline infusion (study group 2). The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The WE control group will use sterile water filling during colonoscope insertion. The study method will use saline filling during colonoscopy insertion. This study will confirm if using the saline infusion is a better method in reducing mucus production when WE colonoscopy is used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 5, 2024
CompletedJanuary 5, 2024
April 1, 2023
8 months
February 23, 2021
June 11, 2022
April 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Left Colon Mucus Score
The amount of residual mucus in the left colon (descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum) is scaled by a mucus score (5-point scale): score 0: no visible mucus; score 1: minimal amounts of clear mucus in thin streaks or strands; score 2: mild opaque mucus in thin strands; score 3: moderate opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering one side of surface; score 4: more opaque mucus in thicker clumps covering more views of lumen.
2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Adenoma Detection Rate
one week (data analyzed after the pathology results were available)
Number of Participants With Cecal Intubation
2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score
2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
Cecal Intubation Time
2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
Withdrawal Inspection Time
2 hours (data collected during colonoscopy procedure)
Study Arms (4)
CO2 insufflation
ACTIVE COMPARATORColonoscopy will be performed in the traditional fashion, with minimal insufflation required to aid insertion. Cleaning in the CO2 group will be performed entirely during withdrawal.
WE with water
ACTIVE COMPARATORResidual air in the colon will be removed, water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
WE with 50% saline
EXPERIMENTALResidual air in the colon will be removed, 50% salline (1:1 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
WE with 25% saline
EXPERIMENTALResidual air in the colon will be removed, 25% saline (1:3 mixture of saline and water) will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused saline will be removed by suction, along with residual decal debris, predominantly during insertion.
Interventions
using 50% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion
using 25% saline solution instead of traditional gas to help insertion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female 20-75 years of age
- Positive screening for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)
- Subjects willing to undergo routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who decline to provide informed consent
- Patients known to have colonic obstruction, active inflammatory bowel disease, or active GI bleeding requiring interventions
- Patients known to have prior history of colonic resection
- Patients with genetic colorectal syndromes
- Patients who are scheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., hemostasis, removal of large polyp)
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology classification of physical status grade 3 or higher
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Evergreen General Hospital
Taoyuan District, 320, Taiwan
Related Publications (4)
El Rahyel A, McWhinney CD, Parsa N, Lahr RE, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Room temperature water infusion during colonoscopy insertion induces rectosigmoid colon mucus production. Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1118-1121. doi: 10.1055/a-1182-5211. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
PMID: 32458999BACKGROUNDAnderson JC, Kahi CJ, Sullivan A, MacPhail M, Garcia J, Rex DK. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO2: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
PMID: 30367879BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
PMID: 20619405BACKGROUNDCheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, Lien JM, Su IC, Tang CP, Hsieh YH, Leung FW. Randomized Trial Comparing Left Colon Mucus Production Using Water vs Saline During Water Exchange Colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 1;14(7):e00594. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000594.
PMID: 37141104DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chi-Liang Cheng
- Organization
- Evergreen General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chiliang Cheng, MD
Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2021
First Posted
February 24, 2021
Study Start
August 4, 2021
Primary Completion
March 23, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 5, 2024
Results First Posted
January 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share