Extracorporeal Shock Wave Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Local Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This RCT is to investigate the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) compared to the local corticosteroid injection (LCI) in managing mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2021
CompletedFebruary 26, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.3 years
February 10, 2021
February 25, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.
At baseline (before the treatment)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.
At 6 months after the treatments
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.
At 12 months after the treatments
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.
At baseline (before the treatment)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.
At 6 months after the treatments
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.
At 12 months after the treatments
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At baseline (before the treatment)
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At 6 months after the treatments
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At 12 months after the treatments
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At baseline (before the treatment)
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At 6 months after the treatments
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential
The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At 12 months after the treatments
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At baseline (before the treatment)
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At 6 months after the treatments
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)
The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.
At 12 months after the treatments
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At baseline (before the treatment)
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At 6 months after the treatments
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential
The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.
At 12 months after the treatments
Study Arms (2)
Extracorporeal shock wave
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received three ESWT sessions once per week for three consecutive weeks. The probe of the ESWT machine (FT-174; Swiss Dolor Class; Switzerland) was placed perpendicularly on the patient's palm over the median nerve on the carpal tunnel after application of the ultrasound gel as a coupling agent. Afterward, the ESWT was administered with 1000 shots, 1.5 bar of pressure, and a frequency of 6 Hz
Local corticosteroid injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORA single injection of one mL (40 mg) of betamethasone into the region surrounding the median nerve.
Interventions
Participants received 3 ESWT sessions once per week for 3 consecutive weeks or a single injection of one mL (40 mg) of betamethasone into the region surrounding the median nerve.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients aged ≥18 years
- Should present a new episode of CTS with symptoms lasting for ≥ six weeks
- Symptoms include wrist pain, numbness, and paraesthesia on the hands
- Tested postive by the Phalen test and Tinel test
- Electrodiagnostically diagnosed with mild to moderate CTS
You may not qualify if:
- A lack of consent information
- A history of a CTS surgery or LCI in the carpal tunnel
- Asystemic disease that may interfere with the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang ZJ, 315000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jin Li, MD
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2021
First Posted
February 23, 2021
Study Start
April 10, 2018
Primary Completion
August 2, 2019
Study Completion
April 10, 2020
Last Updated
February 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Starts on Aug 30, 2019, and will last for 3 years.
Details of interventions, data of the results