NCT04767724

Brief Summary

This RCT is to investigate the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) compared to the local corticosteroid injection (LCI) in managing mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 10, 2018

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 2, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 10, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 26, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is frequently used as a tool to measure the degree of the pain felt by the participants. The score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher score means a higher degree of the pain.

    At 12 months after the treatments

  • Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)

    Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)

    Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)

    Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is the most widely used self-administered outcome scale in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for assessing patients' perceived symptom severity and functional status. The score ranges from 19 to 95. The higher score means a worse status of CTS.

    At 12 months after the treatments

  • The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)

    The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)

    The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)

    The peak latency of the median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At 12 months after the treatments

  • The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential

    The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential

    The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential

    The amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential is used to assess the function status of the median sensory nerve. The value ranges from 0 μV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At 12 months after the treatments

  • The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)

    The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)

    The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP)

    The distal latency of the median compound motor action potential (CMAP) is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 ms. The less value means the quicker conduction of the action potential and the better function status of the nerve.

    At 12 months after the treatments

  • The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential

    The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At baseline (before the treatment)

  • The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential

    The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At 6 months after the treatments

  • The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential

    The amplitude of the median compound motor action potential is used to assess the function status of the median compound motor nerve. The value ranges from 0 mV. The higher value means the better function status of the nerve.

    At 12 months after the treatments

Study Arms (2)

Extracorporeal shock wave

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received three ESWT sessions once per week for three consecutive weeks. The probe of the ESWT machine (FT-174; Swiss Dolor Class; Switzerland) was placed perpendicularly on the patient's palm over the median nerve on the carpal tunnel after application of the ultrasound gel as a coupling agent. Afterward, the ESWT was administered with 1000 shots, 1.5 bar of pressure, and a frequency of 6 Hz

Device: Extracorporeal shock wave

Local corticosteroid injection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A single injection of one mL (40 mg) of betamethasone into the region surrounding the median nerve.

Device: Extracorporeal shock wave

Interventions

Participants received 3 ESWT sessions once per week for 3 consecutive weeks or a single injection of one mL (40 mg) of betamethasone into the region surrounding the median nerve.

Also known as: Local corticosteroid injection
Extracorporeal shock waveLocal corticosteroid injection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The patients aged ≥18 years
  • Should present a new episode of CTS with symptoms lasting for ≥ six weeks
  • Symptoms include wrist pain, numbness, and paraesthesia on the hands
  • Tested postive by the Phalen test and Tinel test
  • Electrodiagnostically diagnosed with mild to moderate CTS

You may not qualify if:

  • A lack of consent information
  • A history of a CTS surgery or LCI in the carpal tunnel
  • Asystemic disease that may interfere with the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital

Ningbo, Zhejiang ZJ, 315000, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Interventions

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Median NeuropathyMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNerve Compression SyndromesCumulative Trauma DisordersSprains and StrainsWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic TherapyDiathermyHyperthermia, InducedTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Jin Li, MD

    Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Posted

February 23, 2021

Study Start

April 10, 2018

Primary Completion

August 2, 2019

Study Completion

April 10, 2020

Last Updated

February 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Details of interventions, data of the results

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Starts on Aug 30, 2019, and will last for 3 years.

Locations