Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With or Without Introducer-tool Stabilization for Pressure Controlled Ventilation
Efficacy of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With or Without Introducer-tool Stabilization for Pressure Controlled Ventilation in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) has become an effective alternative to tracheal tube for gaining airway access and for the institution and maintenance of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in patients undergoing short-to-moderate duration (20-60 minutes) surgery under GA. The PLMA is the more preferred supra-glottic airway access device for advantages therein over the other SGA's, including having an option of dedicated introducer-tool (ease of placement), availability of esophageal opening (allows regurgitated fluid to bypass the airway), and reinforced main body tube (prevents luminal compression). Additionally, as compared to other supra-glottic airway devices, the PLMA device has been found to be more consistent in providing PPV to patients' lungs during GA. However, not uncommonly, PLMA itself is not consistent in maintaining trouble-free PPV owing to the vulnerability to position change, especially secondary to the rhythmic movement posited by back pressure during PPV. This movement vulnerability induced by PPV may be because of the size/shape of PLMA cuff that does fit upon placement but gets vulnerable to undue movement during PPV. We hypothesize that keeping the introducer-tool in position after insertion of PLMA result in greater stabilization of PLMA in position by minimizing the movement that occurs due to back-pressure effect on the cuff during positive pressure ventilation. This randomized study intends to evaluate whether keeping the introducer-tool in position (after PLMA insertion) accords greater positional stabilization to the PLMA and thereby offers greater efficacy for achieving adequate pressure control ventilation in paralyzed anesthetized adults undergoing elective surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 16, 2022
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
1 year
February 17, 2021
August 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal Seal pressure of the PLMA
Oropharyngeal seal pressure (in cmH2O) will be measured by closing the expiratory valve of the anaesthetic circle system at a fixed gas flow rate of 3L/min, and noting the equilibrated upper airway pressure
From time of insertion of PLMA till 120-minutes intraoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Efficiency of positive pressure ventilation (PPV)
From time of insertion of PLMA till 120-minutes intraoperatively
Postoperative sore throat
From end of surgery till 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative cough
From end of surgery till 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative difficulty in swallowing
From end of surgery till 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative difficulty in speaking
From end of surgery till 24 hours postoperatively
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PLMA with Introducer'
ACTIVE COMPARATORPLMA placed in position with the help of the introducer-tool and then the introducer-tool retained in place throughout the institution and duration of positive pressure ventilation.
PLMA without Introducer
ACTIVE COMPARATORPLMA placed in position with the help of the introducer-tool and then the introducer-tool removed before institution of positive pressure ventilation.
Interventions
The pro-seal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) will be inserted along with introducer tool which will be kept in-situ throughout the duration of positive pressure ventilation
The pro-seal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) will be inserted along with introducer tool which will be removed after insertion and patient will be ventilated using PLMA without the introducer in-situ throughout the duration of positive pressure ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20 - 60 years.
- ASA physical status I and II.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients having complaints of acid-peptic disease, chronic constipation, feeling of stomach fullness after meal.
- Previous gastrointestinal surgery
- History of hiatus hernia
- Known case of substance abuse or chronic alcoholism
- Psychiatric illness
- Pregnant patients
- Anatomical defects of the mandible.
- Dental problems (Missing teeth, loose teeth)
- Surgery requiring Trendelenburg position.
- Surgery requiring position change during procedure
- Morbid obesity with OSAS.
- Failure to obtain consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nitin Sethi
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110060, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rakesh Saxena, MBBS, MD
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amitabh Dutta, MD, PGDHR
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abishek SS
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manish Kohli, DA, DNB
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The patient will be blinded to the study intervention as designated by the randomized group he/she would be allocated to. The investigator however will not be blinded to the group allocation.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2021
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
March 3, 2021
Primary Completion
March 16, 2022
Study Completion
March 16, 2022
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share