Fascial Closure Technique After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our study aims to determine postoperative pain outcomes when comparing port site \> 10 mm fascial closure with traditional direct closure versus use of laparoscopic fascial closure device in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery via laparoscopic or robotic techniques. Pain outcomes will be measured using the visual analog scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2022
CompletedMay 12, 2022
May 1, 2022
1 year
February 17, 2021
May 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain scores via Visual Analog Scale
A 20 mm difference in VAS score and a 2-unit difference on a 10-point pain scale have been described as a clinically significant difference between treatment groups.
Through 2 weeks postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quantity of narcotics consumed in postoperative period
Through 2 weeks postoperatively
Length of hospital stay
Through study completion, up to 6 months
Postoperative complication
Through 6 weeks postoperatively
Fascial closure operating time
Duration of fascial closure operating time
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Direct Fascial Closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt the beginning of the laparoscopic procedure, all patients will receive 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into each laparoscopic incision site. Patients in this group will have fascia closed under traditional direct visualization without laparoscopic guidance using a single interrupted suture of 0-vicryl.
Fascial Closure Device
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt the beginning of the laparoscopic procedure, all patients will receive 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into each laparoscopic incision site. Patients in this group will have fascia closed using direct laparscopic visualization with the Carter-Thomason fascial closure device with a single interrupted suture of 0-vicryl.
Interventions
Fascial closure using traditional surgical instruments and suture without laparoscopic guidance.
Fascial closure using a fascial closure device under direct laparoscopic guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 or older.
- Any patient undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with one left upper quadrant port site \> 10 mm via either robotic or traditional laparoscopic techniques for any indication including abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, gynecologic cancer, uterine fibroids, etc. Procedures performed will include but not be limited to hysterectomy, bilateral or unilateral salpingoophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and pelvic floor support procedures.
- Patients willing and able to give informed consent.
- Patients capable and willing to return for follow up and complete pain diaries.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to return for follow up.
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery that requires conversion to laparotomy.
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery that does not require a port site \>10 mm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jessica G Putmanlead
Study Sites (1)
Erlanger Baroness Hospital
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Todd Boren, MD
University of Tennessee College of Medicine Gynecology Oncology
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jessica G Putman, MD
University of Tennessee Chattanooga Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellow
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This will be a prospective, singled-blinded, randomized controlled study. Eligible patients who provide consent will be randomized into one of two arms either undergoing fascial closure with a fascial closure device or traditional direct closure on the day of surgery. Every patient will have equal probability of being assigned to either study arm. The patients will be blinded to which study arm they have been assigned to, but providers will be aware due to the nature of study topic.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Fellow Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2021
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
March 5, 2021
Primary Completion
March 17, 2022
Study Completion
April 14, 2022
Last Updated
May 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share