NCT04765306

Brief Summary

Our study aims to determine postoperative pain outcomes when comparing port site \> 10 mm fascial closure with traditional direct closure versus use of laparoscopic fascial closure device in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery via laparoscopic or robotic techniques. Pain outcomes will be measured using the visual analog scale.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
123

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 17, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 5, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 17, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 14, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain scores via Visual Analog Scale

    A 20 mm difference in VAS score and a 2-unit difference on a 10-point pain scale have been described as a clinically significant difference between treatment groups.

    Through 2 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quantity of narcotics consumed in postoperative period

    Through 2 weeks postoperatively

  • Length of hospital stay

    Through study completion, up to 6 months

  • Postoperative complication

    Through 6 weeks postoperatively

  • Fascial closure operating time

    Duration of fascial closure operating time

Study Arms (2)

Traditional Direct Fascial Closure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

At the beginning of the laparoscopic procedure, all patients will receive 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into each laparoscopic incision site. Patients in this group will have fascia closed under traditional direct visualization without laparoscopic guidance using a single interrupted suture of 0-vicryl.

Device: Traditional Direct Fascial Closure

Fascial Closure Device

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

At the beginning of the laparoscopic procedure, all patients will receive 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine into each laparoscopic incision site. Patients in this group will have fascia closed using direct laparscopic visualization with the Carter-Thomason fascial closure device with a single interrupted suture of 0-vicryl.

Device: Fascial Closure Device

Interventions

Fascial closure using traditional surgical instruments and suture without laparoscopic guidance.

Traditional Direct Fascial Closure

Fascial closure using a fascial closure device under direct laparoscopic guidance.

Fascial Closure Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 or older.
  • Any patient undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with one left upper quadrant port site \> 10 mm via either robotic or traditional laparoscopic techniques for any indication including abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, gynecologic cancer, uterine fibroids, etc. Procedures performed will include but not be limited to hysterectomy, bilateral or unilateral salpingoophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and pelvic floor support procedures.
  • Patients willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Patients capable and willing to return for follow up and complete pain diaries.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients unable to return for follow up.
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery that requires conversion to laparotomy.
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery that does not require a port site \>10 mm.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Erlanger Baroness Hospital

Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Todd Boren, MD

    University of Tennessee College of Medicine Gynecology Oncology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jessica G Putman, MD

    University of Tennessee Chattanooga Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellow

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
This will be a prospective, singled-blinded, randomized controlled study. Eligible patients who provide consent will be randomized into one of two arms either undergoing fascial closure with a fascial closure device or traditional direct closure on the day of surgery. Every patient will have equal probability of being assigned to either study arm. The patients will be blinded to which study arm they have been assigned to, but providers will be aware due to the nature of study topic.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Fellow Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2021

First Posted

February 21, 2021

Study Start

March 5, 2021

Primary Completion

March 17, 2022

Study Completion

April 14, 2022

Last Updated

May 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations