Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Between Intravenous Paracetamol and Fentanyl for Rigid Hysteroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective of study: To compare the efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and fentanyl for intra-operative and post-operative pain relief in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy. Hypothesis of study: There is no difference in pain control between intravenous fentanyl and paracetamol in patients undergoing hysteroscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedFebruary 21, 2021
February 1, 2021
8 months
February 2, 2021
February 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Intra-operative pain assessment was based on the changes at each five minutes interval in systolic and diastolic blood pressure
To assess the intra-operative pain by changes in hemodynamic parameters such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure rising from the 20 percent of baseline value were considered that the patient is experiencing pain
Time frame was zero to 2 hours and data recordings were at 5 minutes interval from start from the surgical stimulation till the completion of the surgical procedure
Intra-operative pain assessment was based on changes in each five minutes interval in mean arterial blood pressure
To assess the intra-operative pain by changes in hemodynamic parameters such as mean arterial blood pressure rising from the 20 percent of baseline value were considered that the patient is experiencing pain
Time frame was zero to 2 hours and data recordings were at 5 minutes interval from start from the surgical stimulation till the completion of the surgical procedure
Intra-operative pain assessment was based on changes in each five minutes interval in heart rate
To assess the intra-operative pain by changes in hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate rising from the 20 percent of the baseline value were considered that the patient is experiencing pain
Time frame was zero to 2 hours and data recordings were at 5 minutes interval from start from the surgical stimulation till the completion of the surgical procedure
Post-operative pain assessed by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS): Immediately after anaesthesia
To assess the postoperative pain by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) by using the scale in numbers from 0-10 cm in post anesthesia care unit. Note: Mild pain was considered score from 0 to 3, Moderate pain was labelled the score from 4 to 6 and Severe pain was considered the score from 7 to 10
Immediately post-anaesthesia
Post-operative pain assessed by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS): 15 minutes after anaesthesia
To assess the postoperative pain by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) by using the scale in numbers from 0-10 cm in post anesthesia care unit. Note: Mild pain was considered score from 0 to 3, Moderate pain was labelled the score from 4 to 6 and Severe pain was considered the score from 7 to 10
15 minutes post-anaesthesia
Post-operative pain assessed by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS): 30 minutes after anaesthesia
To assess the postoperative pain by using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) by using the scale in numbers from 0-10 cm in post anesthesia care unit. Note: Mild pain was considered score from 0 to 3, Moderate pain was labelled the score from 4 to 6 and Severe pain was considered the score from 7 to 10
30 minutes post-anaesthesia
Study Arms (2)
Paracetamol group-P
EXPERIMENTALParacetamol 15mg/Kg was dministered 30 minutes before the start of surgery
Fentanyl group-F
ACTIVE COMPARATORFentanyl 2mcg/kg was administered at the time induction of anaesthesia
Interventions
The paracetamol was administered 30 minutes before the start of surgery for intra-operative and post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing for hysteroscopy
The fentanyl 2mcg/kg was administered at the time induction of anaesthesia for intra-operative and post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing for hysteroscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective surgery
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I \& II
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway
- Gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder
- Body mass index (BMI) \>30kg/m2
- Known Hepatic disorder
- Known ischemic heart disease
- History of hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol and fentanyl or already taking paracetamol and fentanyl
- Patient experiencing the iatrogenic intra-operative uterine perforation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Ali MA, Shamim F, Chughtai S. Comparison between intravenous paracetamol and fentanyl for intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in dilatation and evacuation: Prospective, randomized interventional trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):54-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.150542.
PMID: 25788774BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dileep Kumar, FCPS
Aga Khan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2021
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP
- Time Frame
- After recruitment of sample size
- Access Criteria
- The data can be accessed by requesting the institutional ethical review committee and falling under the category of data sharing
All IPD data will be shared through the publication but without the sharing the participants identities.