NCT04762056

Brief Summary

The present assessment tools for assessing physical function after intensive care unit (ICU) can be categorized as (1) functional tests (2) walk tests (3) strength test (4) Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Strength tests such as Medical Research Council Scale and HRQOL (e.g. Short form-36 (SF-36) tests may require awakening and appropriate mental health. However, mental impairments were seen in a considerable number of patients (2). Walk tests such as Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) or Timed Up\&Go (TUG) can be impractical, some patients could not be able to perform these due to severe impairment. These tests require space to perform and may require management of several drips, drains, and oxygen delivery systems while the patient is walking and turning which render the test difficult to carry out. Among these three specific tools, CPAx seems to be the assessment tool that can be considered easy to use in the clinical setting due to the short time required for assessment and relatively minimal use of equipment (hand dynamometer for grip strength measurement). This study aims to investigate validation of Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in the assessment of the functional status of COVID patients discharged from ICU and investigate the feasibility of commonly used assessment tools for assessing physical function after ICU in COVID patients discharged from ICU.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 22, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

post-intensive care syndromeCOVID-19functional statuscoronavirus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx)

    The CPAx is a bedside assessment tool firstly reported in 2013 to measure physical morbidity in critical care population (12), consisting of 10 items (respiratory function, cough, moving within the bed, supine to sitting on the edge of bed, dynamic sitting, standing balance, sit to stand, transferring from bed to chair, stepping, and grip strength) rated on a 6-point scale from complete dependency (level=0) to independency (level=5), as depicted by Figure 1. Therefore, the CPAx sum score ranges from 0 (worst condition) to 50 (best functioning/independence)

    Within 48 hours discharge

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Barthel Index

    Within 48 hours discharge

  • Katz Index

    Within 48 hours discharge

  • Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS)

    Within 48 hours discharge

  • 30 seconds sit to stand

    Within 48 hours discharge

  • 5 times sit to stand test

    Within 48 hours discharge

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

COVID-19 patients after ICU discharge

Patients who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged

Other: Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool

Interventions

Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool is a bedside assessment tool firstly reported in 2013 to measure physical morbidity in the critical care population, consisting of 10 items (respiratory function, cough, moving within the bed, supine to sitting on the edge of bed, dynamic sitting, standing balance, sit to stand, transferring from bed to chair, stepping, and grip strength) rated on a 6-point scale from complete dependency (level=0) to independency (level=5). Therefore, the CPAx sum score ranges from 0 (worst condition) to 50 (best functioning/independence)

COVID-19 patients after ICU discharge

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients (patients over 18 years of age) who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged and who who are able to follow at least 2 of the commands from De Jonghe and colleagues' awakening criteria (presented below) De Jonghe and colleagues' awakening criteria Can patient follow the command? "Open/close your eyes." "Look at me." "Open your mouth and stick out your tongue." "Nod your head." "Raise your eyebrows when I have counted to 5."

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (patients over 18 years of age)
  • Patients who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged. The patient will be assessed within 48 hours discharge
  • Patients who are able to follow at least 2 of the commands from De Jonghe and colleagues''(8) awakening criteria as follows:
  • Can patient follow the command? "Open/close your eyes." "Look at me." "Open your mouth and stick out your tongue." "Nod your head." "Raise your eyebrows when I have counted to 5."

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with previous neurologic impairment
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients whose grip muscle strength cannot be evaluated (dominant extremity amputation etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Deniz

Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul, 34255, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Koç Univercity Hospital

Istanbul, None Selected, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Elliott D, Denehy L, Berney S, Alison JA. Assessing physical function and activity for survivors of a critical illness: a review of instruments. Aust Crit Care. 2011 Aug;24(3):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

  • Negrini F, Ferrario I, Mazziotti D, Berchicci M, Bonazzi M, de Sire A, Negrini S, Zapparoli L. Neuropsychological Features of Severe Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients at Clinical Stability and Clues for Postacute Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.376. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

  • Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Berney S. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1636-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120310. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

  • Curci C, Pisano F, Bonacci E, Camozzi DM, Ceravolo C, Bergonzi R, De Franceschi S, Moro P, Guarnieri R, Ferrillo M, Negrini F, de Sire A. Early rehabilitation in post-acute COVID-19 patients: data from an Italian COVID-19 Rehabilitation Unit and proposal of a treatment protocol. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):633-641. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06339-X. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

  • Parry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, Jones J, Beach L, El-Ansary D, Koopman R, Denehy L. Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):744-62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3672-x. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

  • Holdar U, Eriksson F, Siesage K, Corner EJ, Ledstrom V, Svensson-Raskh A, Kierkegaard M. Cross-cultural adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the Swedish version of the Chelsea critical care assessment tool (CPAX-Swe) in critically ill patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(11):1600-1604. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1668971. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

  • Nordon-Craft A, Schenkman M, Edbrooke L, Malone DJ, Moss M, Denehy L. The physical function intensive care test: implementation in survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;94(10):1499-507. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130451. Epub 2014 May 8.

  • De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, Cerf C, Renaud E, Mesrati F, Carlet J, Raphael JC, Outin H, Bastuji-Garin S; Groupe de Reflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Reanimation. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2859-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

COVID-19postintensive care syndromeCoronavirus Infections

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pneumonia, ViralPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsVirus DiseasesCoronaviridae InfectionsNidovirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ebru Yilmaz Yalcinkaya, Prof

    Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital Physical and Rehabilitation Department

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Zeynep Turan, MD

    Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mahir Topaloglu, MD

    Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran, Prof

    Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2021

First Posted

February 21, 2021

Study Start

February 22, 2021

Primary Completion

May 30, 2021

Study Completion

May 30, 2021

Last Updated

January 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The data that support the findings of this study will be available on request from the corresponding author (EG). The data will not be publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Locations