CPAx for Assessing Functional Status of COVID-19 Patients After Intensive Care Unit Discharge
Validation of Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx) in COVID-19 Patients for Assessing Functional Status After Intensive Care Unit Discharge
1 other identifier
observational
16
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The present assessment tools for assessing physical function after intensive care unit (ICU) can be categorized as (1) functional tests (2) walk tests (3) strength test (4) Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Strength tests such as Medical Research Council Scale and HRQOL (e.g. Short form-36 (SF-36) tests may require awakening and appropriate mental health. However, mental impairments were seen in a considerable number of patients (2). Walk tests such as Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) or Timed Up\&Go (TUG) can be impractical, some patients could not be able to perform these due to severe impairment. These tests require space to perform and may require management of several drips, drains, and oxygen delivery systems while the patient is walking and turning which render the test difficult to carry out. Among these three specific tools, CPAx seems to be the assessment tool that can be considered easy to use in the clinical setting due to the short time required for assessment and relatively minimal use of equipment (hand dynamometer for grip strength measurement). This study aims to investigate validation of Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in the assessment of the functional status of COVID patients discharged from ICU and investigate the feasibility of commonly used assessment tools for assessing physical function after ICU in COVID patients discharged from ICU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2023
January 1, 2023
3 months
February 18, 2021
January 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx)
The CPAx is a bedside assessment tool firstly reported in 2013 to measure physical morbidity in critical care population (12), consisting of 10 items (respiratory function, cough, moving within the bed, supine to sitting on the edge of bed, dynamic sitting, standing balance, sit to stand, transferring from bed to chair, stepping, and grip strength) rated on a 6-point scale from complete dependency (level=0) to independency (level=5), as depicted by Figure 1. Therefore, the CPAx sum score ranges from 0 (worst condition) to 50 (best functioning/independence)
Within 48 hours discharge
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Barthel Index
Within 48 hours discharge
Katz Index
Within 48 hours discharge
Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS)
Within 48 hours discharge
30 seconds sit to stand
Within 48 hours discharge
5 times sit to stand test
Within 48 hours discharge
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
COVID-19 patients after ICU discharge
Patients who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged
Interventions
Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool is a bedside assessment tool firstly reported in 2013 to measure physical morbidity in the critical care population, consisting of 10 items (respiratory function, cough, moving within the bed, supine to sitting on the edge of bed, dynamic sitting, standing balance, sit to stand, transferring from bed to chair, stepping, and grip strength) rated on a 6-point scale from complete dependency (level=0) to independency (level=5). Therefore, the CPAx sum score ranges from 0 (worst condition) to 50 (best functioning/independence)
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients (patients over 18 years of age) who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged and who who are able to follow at least 2 of the commands from De Jonghe and colleagues' awakening criteria (presented below) De Jonghe and colleagues' awakening criteria Can patient follow the command? "Open/close your eyes." "Look at me." "Open your mouth and stick out your tongue." "Nod your head." "Raise your eyebrows when I have counted to 5."
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (patients over 18 years of age)
- Patients who suffered COVID-19 pneumonia and stayed in ICU and discharged. The patient will be assessed within 48 hours discharge
- Patients who are able to follow at least 2 of the commands from De Jonghe and colleagues''(8) awakening criteria as follows:
- Can patient follow the command? "Open/close your eyes." "Look at me." "Open your mouth and stick out your tongue." "Nod your head." "Raise your eyebrows when I have counted to 5."
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with previous neurologic impairment
- Pregnancy
- Patients whose grip muscle strength cannot be evaluated (dominant extremity amputation etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Deniz
Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul, 34255, Turkey (Türkiye)
Koç Univercity Hospital
Istanbul, None Selected, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Elliott D, Denehy L, Berney S, Alison JA. Assessing physical function and activity for survivors of a critical illness: a review of instruments. Aust Crit Care. 2011 Aug;24(3):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 21723143RESULTNegrini F, Ferrario I, Mazziotti D, Berchicci M, Bonazzi M, de Sire A, Negrini S, Zapparoli L. Neuropsychological Features of Severe Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients at Clinical Stability and Clues for Postacute Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.376. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
PMID: 32991870RESULTDenehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Berney S. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1636-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120310. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23886842RESULTCurci C, Pisano F, Bonacci E, Camozzi DM, Ceravolo C, Bergonzi R, De Franceschi S, Moro P, Guarnieri R, Ferrillo M, Negrini F, de Sire A. Early rehabilitation in post-acute COVID-19 patients: data from an Italian COVID-19 Rehabilitation Unit and proposal of a treatment protocol. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):633-641. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06339-X. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PMID: 32667150RESULTParry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, Jones J, Beach L, El-Ansary D, Koopman R, Denehy L. Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):744-62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3672-x. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
PMID: 25652888RESULTHoldar U, Eriksson F, Siesage K, Corner EJ, Ledstrom V, Svensson-Raskh A, Kierkegaard M. Cross-cultural adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the Swedish version of the Chelsea critical care assessment tool (CPAX-Swe) in critically ill patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(11):1600-1604. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1668971. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
PMID: 31558043RESULTNordon-Craft A, Schenkman M, Edbrooke L, Malone DJ, Moss M, Denehy L. The physical function intensive care test: implementation in survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;94(10):1499-507. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130451. Epub 2014 May 8.
PMID: 24810863RESULTDe Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, Cerf C, Renaud E, Mesrati F, Carlet J, Raphael JC, Outin H, Bastuji-Garin S; Groupe de Reflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Reanimation. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2859-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859.
PMID: 12472328RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ebru Yilmaz Yalcinkaya, Prof
Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital Physical and Rehabilitation Department
- STUDY CHAIR
Zeynep Turan, MD
Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- STUDY CHAIR
Mahir Topaloglu, MD
Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran, Prof
Koc University School of Medicine Department of Phsical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2021
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
February 22, 2021
Primary Completion
May 30, 2021
Study Completion
May 30, 2021
Last Updated
January 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data that support the findings of this study will be available on request from the corresponding author (EG). The data will not be publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.