Comparison of Different Approaches for Supraclavicular Block and Their Effects on Diaphragm Muscle Function
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Brachial plexus blocks used for anesthesia in upper extremity operations can be performed with interscalene, axillary, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches. Plexus blockage can be performed under the guidance of needle nerve stimulation, artery palpation or ultrasonography (USG). Nowadays, the simultaneous use of USG during the block allows the protection of structures such as nerves, pleura and vessels, and allows practitioners to see the needle and the spread of local anesthetic during the injection. Although supraclavicular block seems to be advantageous because the brachial plexus is more compact and superficial in this region, it has a disadvantage of being close to the pleura. (Increased risk of pneumothorax) With the use of USG, this risk has decreased and the supraclavicular block has become an alternative to infraclavicular block, which is widely used in upper extremity surgery. Due to the compact structure of the brachial plexus trunk at the first rib level, the application of the block is easier and the block formation is faster due to the peripheral spread of the local anesthetic. With the spread of local anesthetic to C3-C5 nerve roots in the brachial plexus, paralysis can be seen in the ipsilateral phrenic nerve up to 67%. Patients who will be operated on, especially in patients with respiratory distress, may experience respiratory distress due to the dysfunction of that side diaphragm muscle. With the help of ultrasound, the inspiratory and end-expiratory thickness of the diaphragm is measured with the Diaphragm Thickness Index (DTI), which is a new and effective method used as a mechanical ventilator weaning index in intensive care units. With this method, we can examine the effect of phrenic nerve block on diaphragm muscle due to local anesthesia in the acute period. DTI is calculated as a percentage from the following formula: (Max thickness at the end of inspiration - Max thickness at the end of the expiration) / Max thickness at the end of the expiration. By comparing 3 different approaches used in supraclavicular block, we aimed to investigate the most appropriate block approach in terms of effectiveness, speed, complication rate, effects on diaphragm and 6 months effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2022
CompletedJune 13, 2023
June 1, 2023
6 months
February 8, 2021
June 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Three Different Approach for Supraclavicular Blocks Effects on Diaphragm Thickening Fraction
Several diaphragm images will be taken, at least three at the point of maximum thickening in TLC and at least three at minimum thickness in RV. On each B-mode image, diaphragm thickness will be measured from the middle of the pleural line to the middle of the peritoneal line. Then DTI will be calculated as a percentage from the formula: (Max thickness at the end of inspiration - Max thickness at the end of the expiration) / Max thickness at the end of the expiration. All patients will be evaluated with USG in a head-up position facing the side to be operated 30 minutes after the block is performed.
Comparison of Diaphragm Thickening Fraction will be evaluated 30 minutes after the block is performed.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
The sensory block level
Following the block operation, the sensory block level will be recorded at the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th minutes
The motor block level
Following the block operation, the motor block level will be recorded at the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th minutes
Block success
At the 30th minute of LA application,
Postoperative analgesia time
The hour when NRS> 1 in the first 24 hours will be recorded.
Pain Score Follow-up
2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
corner pocket
EXPERIMENTALThe block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist in block applications under USG guidance. After the antisepsis of the area to be blocked, a 22G 50 mm stimulator needle will be used for the block . Intermittent negative aspiration will be performed during all procedures to detect possible vascular puncture. 20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml) Local anesthetic mixture will be given to the corner pocket - where the artery and the first rib intersect in the sonoanatomical image.
corner+intracluster
EXPERIMENTALThe block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist in block applications under USG guidance. After the antisepsis of the area to be blocked, a 22G 50 mm stimulator needle will be used for the block . Intermittent negative aspiration will be performed during all procedures to detect possible vascular puncture20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml) 10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be given to the described corner pack and the remaining 10 ml into the largest nerve cluster (Intracluster injection).
multi
EXPERIMENTALThe block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist in block applications under USG guidance. After the antisepsis of the area to be blocked, a 22G 50 mm stimulator needle will be used for the block . Intermittent negative aspiration will be performed during all procedures to detect possible vascular puncture. 20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml) Local anesthetic mixture will be administered by multi injection method between the nerve groups seen in the sonoanatomical image.
Interventions
20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml)
20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml)
20 ml of bupivacaine(Buvicaine HCl %0.5) and prilocaine(Priloc HCl %2) 1:1 mixture will be prepared in a way that there will be 5mcg adrenaline per ml.(9ml bupivacaine, 9ml prilocaine and 2ml saline with 50 mcg adrenaline per ml)
The blocks will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist with a USG guidance. Local anesthetic mixture will be given to the corner pocket - where the artery and the first rib intersect in the sonoanatomical image.
The blocks will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist with a USG guidance .10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be given to the described corner pack and the remaining 10 ml into the largest nerve cluster (Intracluster injection).
The blocks will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist with a USG guidance Local anesthetic mixture will be administered by multi injection method between the nerve groups seen in the sonoanatomical image.
All patients will be evaluated with USG in a head-up position facing the side to be operated before and 30 minutes after the block is performed. The probe will be placed perpendicular to the chest wall, in the eighth or ninth intercostal space, between the anterior axillary and midaxillary lines, 0.5 to 2 cm below the costophrenic sinus.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are scheduled scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, arm surgery
- Patients who has informed consent for study
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification(ASA) I,II and III
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal to participate
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients with known local anesthetic allergy
- Patients with Body mass index\> 35
- Patients diagnosed sepsis and bacteriemia,
- Skin infection at the injection site,
- History of coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes,
- Uncoordinated patients,
- Psychological and emotional lability,
- Patients with anatomical disorders at application points
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Izmir, Karabaglar, 35170, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Ferrari G, De Filippi G, Elia F, Panero F, Volpicelli G, Apra F. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2014 Jun 7;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-6-8. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24949192BACKGROUNDPetrar SD, Seltenrich ME, Head SJ, Schwarz SK. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000215.
PMID: 25650633BACKGROUNDRenes SH, Spoormans HH, Gielen MJ, Rettig HC, van Geffen GJ. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis can be avoided in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):595-9. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbd83.
PMID: 19916254BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Çağrı Yeşilnacar, MD
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Zeki T Tekgül, Assoc Prof
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
AYSUN A KAR, MD
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
TAŞKIN ALTAY, Assoc Prof
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant will not know which group he or she is in. The diaphragm thickening fraction and evaluations (outcomes) will be made by another experienced anesthesiologist, double-blindness will be achieved by being blind to the patient's group. Block evaluation and measurements will be made by a different experienced anesthesiologist .
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- anesthesiology resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2021
First Posted
February 16, 2021
Study Start
February 16, 2021
Primary Completion
August 15, 2021
Study Completion
March 2, 2022
Last Updated
June 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share