NCT04755582

Brief Summary

To compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 16, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 5, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

wearable ecgelectrocardiogram

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of smartphone or wearable ECG devices compared to gold standard ECG devices

    To compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.

    2 hours

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Assessing the effects on the ECG of: - Posture or position of the patient

    2 hours

  • Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Movement

    2 hours

  • Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Amount of hair on the ECG site

    12 months

  • Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Skin condition (tone/dryness)

    12 months

  • Ability to detect a paced rhythm accurately.

    2 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants will be recruited from cardiology wards across the University Hospitals of Leicester trust.

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Must have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English
  • Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with study requirements.
  • Must be over 18 years of age
  • Must be deemed clinically stable by their direct care team.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who do not have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English
  • Patients who are medically unstable, as defined by the patient's direct care team.
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent
  • Patients who are deemed clinically unstable by their direct care team

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

Leicester, Leicestershire, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • G. Andre Ng

    University of Leicester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Zakariyya Vali

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2021

First Posted

February 16, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2022

Study Completion

December 31, 2022

Last Updated

February 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations