ctDNA as a Assisted Diagnosis, Early Intervention and Prognostic Marker for Peritoneal Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a Assisted Diagnosis, Early Intervention and Prognostic Marker for Peritoneal Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
138
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, by monitoring the serum ctDNA mutational profile using NGS, aiming to elucidate the correlation between the postoperative ctDNA status and the assisted diagnosis, early intervention and prognosis for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 24, 2025
CompletedFebruary 12, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.1 years
January 26, 2021
February 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peritoneal Metastasis Free Survival (PMFS)
The survival rate without peritoneal metastasis (oligometastatic) at 24 months after radical resection of colorectal cancer.
Through study completion, up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Detection Rate (DR)
Interim analyses: After 69 patients have been enrolled, up to 1.5 years
Positive Percent Agreement (PPA)
Interim analyses: After 69 patients have been enrolled, up to 1.5 years
Negative Percent Agreement (NPA)
Interim analyses: After 69 patients have been enrolled, up to 1.5 years
The time of peritoneal metastasis diagnosed after radical surgery
Interim analyses: After 69 patients have been enrolled, up to 1.5 years
Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) Score
Interim analyses: After 69 patients have been enrolled, up to 1.5 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ctDNA monitoring
EXPERIMENTALctDNA monitoring will be performed at protocol-specified intervals and requirement
Imageology (SOC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORImaging examination will be performed at protocol-specified intervals and requirement
Interventions
Patients who undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer for 6\~12 months and with 2 consecutive positive ctDNA testing results within 1 month will be enrolled, and diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed immediately after enrollment. Patients with positive peritoneal metastasis (PCI score \<20) will be treated with CRS+HIPEC. Tumor markers, endoscopic and imaging examinations, and ctDNA monitoring will be performed every 3 months in patients with negative peritoneal metastasis. Laparoscopy will be performed when imaging suggested peritoneal metastasis (oligometastases). Re-diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed 24 months after radical surgery when there is no radiographic evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Follow-up time will up to 36 months after colorectal cancer surgery.
Patients who undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer for 6\~12 months and with 2 consecutive positive ctDNA testing results within 1 month will be enrolled. and there will be no need to conduct endoscopic exploration immediately after enrollment. Tumor markers, endoscopic and imaging examinations, and ctDNA monitoring will be performed every 3 months until imaging suggested peritoneal metastasis (oligometastases). Patients with positive peritoneal metastasis (PCI score \<20) will be treated with CRS+HIPEC. Re-diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed 24 months after radical surgery when there is no radiographic evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Follow-up time will up to 36 months after colorectal cancer surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be a man or woman of at 18-75;
- Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-21;
- Patients with primary colorectal cancer proven by pathology;
- Patients with high risk factors for peritoneal metastasis (simultaneous peritoneal metastasis, ovarian metastasis, PT4, CT4, tumor perforation, tumor-complete intestinal obstruction, mucinous adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell carcinoma of PT3, positive surgical margin, and tumor rupture and hemorrhage);
- months after colorectal cancer radical surgery, patients who have two consecutive positive ctDNA tests within one month;
- Patients who have finished standard adjuvant therapy after surgery; (Choose 5-FU or 5-FU analog-based chemotherapy regimen, and the perioperative chemotherapy should not exceed 6 months);
- Patients who are negative of recurrence or metastasis in conventional oncology examination (serology, endoscopy, imaging) ;
- Written informed consent must be obtained from patients and ability for patients to comply with the requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who were diagnosed with other malignant tumors within 2 years before diagnosis of colorectal cancer;
- ASA class Ⅳ to Ⅴ;
- Patients who have other existence of distant metastasis outside the abdomen;
- Patients with serious mental illness;
- Patients with severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infections, or other uncontrollable co-diseases;
- Patients who cannot be followed up as scheduled;
- Patients who participated in other clinical studies within 3 months prior to the trial;
- Pregnant or nursing women, men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China
Related Publications (18)
Franko J, Shi Q, Goldman CD, Pockaj BA, Nelson GD, Goldberg RM, Pitot HC, Grothey A, Alberts SR, Sargent DJ. Treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis with systemic chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of north central cancer treatment group phase III trials N9741 and N9841. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):263-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1039. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
PMID: 22162570BACKGROUNDYonemura Y, Bandou E, Kawamura T, Endou Y, Sasaki T. Quantitative prognostic indicators of peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Aug;32(6):602-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
PMID: 16617004BACKGROUNDElias D, Lefevre JH, Chevalier J, Brouquet A, Marchal F, Classe JM, Ferron G, Guilloit JM, Meeus P, Goere D, Bonastre J. Complete cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):681-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7160. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
PMID: 19103728BACKGROUNDBaratti D, Kusamura S, Deraco M. The Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy (Milan, Italy, December 4-6, 2006): methodology of disease-specific consensus. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep 15;98(4):258-62. doi: 10.1002/jso.21056.
PMID: 18726888BACKGROUNDEsquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A, Melero JT, Levine EA, Gutman M, Howard R, Piso P, Nissan A, Gomez-Portilla A, Gonzalez-Bayon L, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Shen P, Stewart JH, Sugarbaker PH, Barone RM, Hoefer R, Morris DL, Sardi A, Sticca RP. Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;102(6):565-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.21601.
PMID: 20976729BACKGROUNDDromain C, Leboulleux S, Auperin A, Goere D, Malka D, Lumbroso J, Schumberger M, Sigal R, Elias D. Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: enhanced CT vs. PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9211-7.
PMID: 17632751BACKGROUNDBettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, Bartlett BR, Wang H, Luber B, Alani RM, Antonarakis ES, Azad NS, Bardelli A, Brem H, Cameron JL, Lee CC, Fecher LA, Gallia GL, Gibbs P, Le D, Giuntoli RL, Goggins M, Hogarty MD, Holdhoff M, Hong SM, Jiao Y, Juhl HH, Kim JJ, Siravegna G, Laheru DA, Lauricella C, Lim M, Lipson EJ, Marie SK, Netto GJ, Oliner KS, Olivi A, Olsson L, Riggins GJ, Sartore-Bianchi A, Schmidt K, Shih lM, Oba-Shinjo SM, Siena S, Theodorescu D, Tie J, Harkins TT, Veronese S, Wang TL, Weingart JD, Wolfgang CL, Wood LD, Xing D, Hruban RH, Wu J, Allen PJ, Schmidt CM, Choti MA, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Diaz LA Jr. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094.
PMID: 24553385BACKGROUNDAbbosh C, Birkbak NJ, Wilson GA, Jamal-Hanjani M, Constantin T, Salari R, Le Quesne J, Moore DA, Veeriah S, Rosenthal R, Marafioti T, Kirkizlar E, Watkins TBK, McGranahan N, Ward S, Martinson L, Riley J, Fraioli F, Al Bakir M, Gronroos E, Zambrana F, Endozo R, Bi WL, Fennessy FM, Sponer N, Johnson D, Laycock J, Shafi S, Czyzewska-Khan J, Rowan A, Chambers T, Matthews N, Turajlic S, Hiley C, Lee SM, Forster MD, Ahmad T, Falzon M, Borg E, Lawrence D, Hayward M, Kolvekar S, Panagiotopoulos N, Janes SM, Thakrar R, Ahmed A, Blackhall F, Summers Y, Hafez D, Naik A, Ganguly A, Kareht S, Shah R, Joseph L, Marie Quinn A, Crosbie PA, Naidu B, Middleton G, Langman G, Trotter S, Nicolson M, Remmen H, Kerr K, Chetty M, Gomersall L, Fennell DA, Nakas A, Rathinam S, Anand G, Khan S, Russell P, Ezhil V, Ismail B, Irvin-Sellers M, Prakash V, Lester JF, Kornaszewska M, Attanoos R, Adams H, Davies H, Oukrif D, Akarca AU, Hartley JA, Lowe HL, Lock S, Iles N, Bell H, Ngai Y, Elgar G, Szallasi Z, Schwarz RF, Herrero J, Stewart A, Quezada SA, Peggs KS, Van Loo P, Dive C, Lin CJ, Rabinowitz M, Aerts HJWL, Hackshaw A, Shaw JA, Zimmermann BG; TRACERx consortium; PEACE consortium; Swanton C. Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature. 2017 Apr 26;545(7655):446-451. doi: 10.1038/nature22364.
PMID: 28445469BACKGROUNDTie J, Wang Y, Tomasetti C, Li L, Springer S, Kinde I, Silliman N, Tacey M, Wong HL, Christie M, Kosmider S, Skinner I, Wong R, Steel M, Tran B, Desai J, Jones I, Haydon A, Hayes T, Price TJ, Strausberg RL, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA analysis detects minimal residual disease and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6219.
PMID: 27384348BACKGROUNDSaluja H, Karapetis CS, Pedersen SK, Young GP, Symonds EL. The Use of Circulating Tumor DNA for Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Front Oncol. 2018 Jul 24;8:275. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00275. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30087854BACKGROUNDOssandon MR, Agrawal L, Bernhard EJ, Conley BA, Dey SM, Divi RL, Guan P, Lively TG, McKee TC, Sorg BS, Tricoli JV. Circulating Tumor DNA Assays in Clinical Cancer Research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):929-934. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy105.
PMID: 29931312BACKGROUNDYang QM, Bando E, Kawamura T, Tsukiyama G, Nemoto M, Yonemura Y, Furukawa H. The diagnostic value of PET-CT for peritoneal dissemination of abdominal malignancies. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2006 Nov;33(12):1817-21.
PMID: 17212117BACKGROUNDYonemura Y, Elnemr A, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Li Y. Multidisciplinary therapy for treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 Feb 15;2(2):85-97. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i2.85.
PMID: 21160926BACKGROUNDSatoh Y, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Kimura K, Sou H, Sano K, Araki T. Diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, diffusion-weighted MRI, and contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):447-53. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4687.
PMID: 21257899BACKGROUNDBrucher BL, Piso P, Verwaal V, Esquivel J, Derraco M, Yonemura Y, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Pelz J, Konigsrainer A, Strohlein M, Levine EA, Morris D, Bartlett D, Glehen O, Garofalo A, Nissan A. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC--overview and basics. Cancer Invest. 2012 Mar;30(3):209-24. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2012.654871.
PMID: 22360361BACKGROUNDKoh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;16(2):327-33. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0234-2. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
PMID: 19050972BACKGROUNDRausei S, Ruspi L, Mangano A, Lianos GD, Galli F, Boni L, Roukos DH, Dionigi G. Advantages of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer: they are so obvious that they are not evident. Future Oncol. 2015;11(3):369-72. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.283. No abstract available.
PMID: 25675119BACKGROUNDStroun M, Anker P, Maurice P, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Beljanski M. Neoplastic characteristics of the DNA found in the plasma of cancer patients. Oncology. 1989;46(5):318-22. doi: 10.1159/000226740.
PMID: 2779946BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2021
First Posted
February 12, 2021
Study Start
August 24, 2020
Primary Completion
September 24, 2023
Study Completion
August 24, 2025
Last Updated
February 12, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share