NCT04750850

Brief Summary

The hereditary ataxias are a group of genetic disorders characterized by slowly progressive incoordination of gait and balance impairments in sitting and standing. Trunk local stability during gait is lower in patients with degenerative ataxia than that in healthy adult population. Given the fact that drug interventions are rare in degenerative diseases and limited to only specific type of diseases and symptoms, physiotherapy is a major cornerstone in current therapy of ataxic gait. Core stability exercises training could be included as an adjunct to conventional balance training in improving dynamic balance and gait. Due to the nature of the interventions, the study will have a single blind design.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

ataxiabalancegait ataxiaactivities of daily livingcore stability exercisespostural balance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination

    Spanish-version of Trunk Impairment Scale 2.0. Each item will be performed three times and the highest score counts. Otherwise, no practice session allowed. The patient can be corrected between attempts. The tests are verbally explained to the patient and can be demonstrated if needed. There are two subscales: dynamic sitting balance and coordination. The first have 10 items and second 6. The highest possible total score is consequently 16 points, which indicates a good dynamic sitting balance and correct trunk control and sitting coordination. If the patient cannot maintain a sitting position for 10 seconds without back and arm support, with hands on thighs, feet in contact with the ground and knees bent at 90° (starting position), the total score for the scale is 0 points.

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of static sitting balance

    Sitting section of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA). Patient is asked to sit on an examination bed without support of feet, eyes open and arms outstretched to the front. 0 Normal, no difficulties sitting \>10 seconds, 1 Slight difficulties, intermittent sway, 2 Constant sway, but able to sit \> 10 s without support, 3 Able to sit for \> 10 s only with intermittent support, 4 Unable to sit for \>10 s without continuous support

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of ataxia severity

    Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). The scale is made up of 8 items related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Rate of standing balance

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of gait ability

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of balance confidence

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of lower limb strength

    T1: Baseline, T2: 5 weeks and T3: follow up 5 weeks

  • Rate of adherence

    T2: 5 weeks

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Core stability exercises group

EXPERIMENTAL

30 minutes of core stability exercises program at a light intensity and take a rest breaks if is necessary. They will be instructed in the use of the 4-5 points of the Borg 10 Rating of Perceived Exertion for self-monitoring of exercise intensity. The exercises will performed twice a day for 5 days a week during 5 weeks. A physiotherapist conducted an initial home visit to ensure correct execution of the exercises. He or she will teach the exercises and then the patient will perform them alone in your home. Once a week the physiotherapist will phone the patient and will ask her/him for doubts.

Other: Therapeutic core stability exercises

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients to continue as normal and not change their routine in terms of exercise and physical activity during the period of study.

Other: Usual care

Interventions

exercises focused on trunk muscle strengthening, proprioception, selective movements of the trunk and pelvis muscle, and coordination, and will be carried out in supine, sitting on a stable surface and sitting on an unstable surface (ball). The exercise involves changes in the position of the body with or without resistance, aiming to improve strength, endurance, proprioception and coordination. Training is determined by the patient's ability to undertake easy exercises and progress to more challenging exercises.

Also known as: trunk exercises
Core stability exercises group

Usual routine as walking and activities of daily living.

Also known as: Conventional physiotherapy
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rosa Cabanas Valdés

Cardedeu, Barcelona, 08440, Spain

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Chen DH, Latimer C, Yagi M, Ndugga-Kabuye MK, Heigham E, Jayadev S, Meabon JS, Gomez CM, Keene CD, Cook DG, Raskind WH, Bird TD. Heterozygous STUB1 missense variants cause ataxia, cognitive decline, and STUB1 mislocalization. Neurol Genet. 2020 Feb 10;6(2):1-13. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000397. eCollection 2020 Apr.

    PMID: 32211513BACKGROUND
  • Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(3):174-83. doi: 10.1159/000358801. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

    PMID: 24603320BACKGROUND
  • OVERTON, Caroline E.; O'BRIEN, Kate. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Miscarriage. Early Pregnancy, 2017, 129.

    BACKGROUND
  • Marquer A, Barbieri G, Perennou D. The assessment and treatment of postural disorders in cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Mar;57(2):67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

    PMID: 24582474BACKGROUND
  • Chini G, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Casali C, Conte C, Martino G, Leonardi L, Padua L, Coppola G, Pierelli F, Serrao M. Local Stability of the Trunk in Patients with Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia During Walking. Cerebellum. 2017 Feb;16(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0760-6.

    PMID: 26811155BACKGROUND
  • Park J, Gong J, Yim J. Effects of a sitting boxing program on upper limb function, balance, gait, and quality of life in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(1):77-86. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161392.

    PMID: 27792020BACKGROUND
  • Cabanas-Valdes R, Urrutia G, Bagur-Calafat C, Caballero-Gomez FM, German-Romero A, Girabent-Farres M. Validation of the Spanish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale Version 2.0 (TIS 2.0) to assess dynamic sitting balance and coordination in post-stroke adult patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Aug;23(4):225-32. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1151662. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

    PMID: 26922850BACKGROUND
  • Haruyama K, Kawakami M, Otsuka T. Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):240-249. doi: 10.1177/1545968316675431. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

    PMID: 27821673BACKGROUND
  • Cabrera-Martos I, Jimenez-Martin AT, Lopez-Lopez L, Rodriguez-Torres J, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza MC. Effects of a core stabilization training program on balance ability in persons with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jun;34(6):764-772. doi: 10.1177/0269215520918631. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

    PMID: 32349543BACKGROUND
  • Cabanas-Valdes R, Bagur-Calafat C, Girabent-Farres M, Caballero-Gomez FM, Hernandez-Valino M, Urrutia Cuchi G. The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Oct;30(10):1024-1033. doi: 10.1177/0269215515609414. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

    PMID: 26451007BACKGROUND
  • Synofzik M, Ilg W. Motor training in degenerative spinocerebellar disease: ataxia-specific improvements by intensive physiotherapy and exergames. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:583507. doi: 10.1155/2014/583507. Epub 2014 Apr 27.

    PMID: 24877117BACKGROUND
  • He M, Zhang HN, Tang ZC, Gao SG. Balance and coordination training for patients with genetic degenerative ataxia: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2021 Oct;268(10):3690-3705. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09938-6. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

    PMID: 32583055BACKGROUND
  • Milne SC, Corben LA, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Delatycki MB, Yiu EM. Rehabilitation for Individuals With Genetic Degenerative Ataxia: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Jul;31(7):609-622. doi: 10.1177/1545968317712469. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

    PMID: 28595509BACKGROUND
  • Seco, C. J., et al. Improvements in quality of life in individuals with friedreich's ataxia after participation in a 5-year program of physical activity: an observational study pre-post test design, and two years follow-up. Int J Neurorehabil, 2014, 1.3: 129

    BACKGROUND
  • Chang YJ, Chou CC, Huang WT, Lu CS, Wong AM, Hsu MJ. Cycling regimen induces spinal circuitry plasticity and improves leg muscle coordination in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

    PMID: 25668777BACKGROUND
  • Miyai I, Ito M, Hattori N, Mihara M, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Sobue G, Nishizawa M; Cerebellar Ataxia Rehabilitation Trialists Collaboration. Cerebellar ataxia rehabilitation trial in degenerative cerebellar diseases. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):515-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425918. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

    PMID: 22140200BACKGROUND
  • Bunn LM, Marsden JF, Giunti P, Day BL. Training balance with opto-kinetic stimuli in the home: a randomized controlled feasibility study in people with pure cerebellar disease. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Feb;29(2):143-53. doi: 10.1177/0269215514539336. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

    PMID: 25082955BACKGROUND
  • Velazquez-Perez L, Rodriguez-Diaz JC, Rodriguez-Labrada R, Medrano-Montero J, Aguilera Cruz AB, Reynaldo-Cejas L, Gongora-Marrero M, Estupinan-Rodriguez A, Vazquez-Mojena Y, Torres-Vega R. Neurorehabilitation Improves the Motor Features in Prodromal SCA2: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Mov Disord. 2019 Jul;34(7):1060-1068. doi: 10.1002/mds.27676. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

    PMID: 30958572BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez-Diaz JC, Velazquez-Perez L, Rodriguez Labrada R, Aguilera Rodriguez R, Laffita Perez D, Canales Ochoa N, Medrano Montero J, Estupinan Rodriguez A, Osorio Borjas M, Gongora Marrero M, Reynaldo Cejas L, Gonzalez Zaldivar Y, Almaguer Gotay D. Neurorehabilitation therapy in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: A 24-week, rater-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2018 Sep;33(9):1481-1487. doi: 10.1002/mds.27437. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

    PMID: 30132999BACKGROUND
  • Tabbassum, Khan Neha, et al. Core stability training with conventional balance training improves dynamic balance in progressive degenerative cerebellar ataxia. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, 2013, 7.1: 136.

    BACKGROUND
  • Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, Giunti P, Globas C, Infante J, Kang JS, Kremer B, Mariotti C, Melegh B, Pandolfo M, Rakowicz M, Ribai P, Rola R, Schols L, Szymanski S, van de Warrenburg BP, Durr A, Klockgether T, Fancellu R. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006 Jun 13;66(11):1717-20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92.

    PMID: 16769946BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinocerebellar DegenerationsCerebellar AtaxiaAtaxiaGait Ataxia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebellar DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesSpinal Cord DiseasesHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesDyskinesiasNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsGait Disorders, Neurologic

Study Officials

  • Rosa C Cabanas-Valdés, PhD

    Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Posted

February 11, 2021

Study Start

May 20, 2021

Primary Completion

November 30, 2022

Study Completion

January 10, 2023

Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations