NCT04749836

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and clinical outcomes after different pacing approaches of conduction system pacing in a prospective registry.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 4, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2021

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

His bundle pacingLeft bundle branch area pacingBachmann bundle pacing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Acute and long-term implant success rate

    Ventricular activation occurring over the conduction system with acceptable pacing threshold

    through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Pacing parameters

    peri-procedural

  • Stepwise approach of pacing modes

    peri-procedural

  • Pacing lead stability

    through study completion, an average of 2 years

  • Heart failure hospitalisation

    through study completion, an average of 2 years

  • Echocardiographic measurements

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

Different active fixation leads and the dedicated delivery sheaths are introduced via standard transvenous approach under fluoroscopic guidance. His bundle potential mapping is performed in a unipolar setting with the use of the electrophysiological system for His bundle pacing. After localizing the His bundle potential, the pacing is attempted before the lead fixation to confirm HB capture. The lead is then screwed into position. Acute HBP threshold ≤ 2.5V at 1ms is considered acceptable. On the other hand, the initial site for LBBP is approximately 1-1.5 cm distal to the HBP lead position in the RV septum along the line between the HBP site and RV apex in the right anterior oblique (30°) fluoroscopic view. Bachmann bundle pacing (upper atrial septum) will be performed with the J-stylet modification technique or with specialized catheter method using the SelectSecure active fixation lead. Stepwise approach for conduction pacing will also be tested.

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All comers with pacing indication as described in eligibility criteria.

You may qualify if:

  • Class I and II indications for permanent pacing
  • Atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular rate for pace and ablate strategy
  • Bundle branch block correction for HF patients
  • Patients with prolonged PR interval and dromotropathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Centre Ljubljana - Cardiology department

Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (14)

  • Das A, Banerjee S, Mandal SC. A simple method for Bachmann's bundle pacing with indigenous modification of J-stylet. Indian Heart J. 2016 Sep-Oct;68(5):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.10.299. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

    PMID: 27773407BACKGROUND
  • Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP, O'Neill GP, Rothbart S, Martins JB, Roelke M, Steinberg JS, Greene HL; DAVID Investigators. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Aug;2(8):830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.05.015.

    PMID: 16051118BACKGROUND
  • Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P, Schuger C, Daubert J, McNitt S, Andrews M, Brown M, Hall WJ, Zareba W, Moss AJ; MADIT II Investigators. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):359-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.50038.x.

    PMID: 15828875BACKGROUND
  • Vijayaraman P, Bordachar P, Ellenbogen KA. The Continued Search for Physiological Pacing: Where Are We Now? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 27;69(25):3099-3114. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.005.

    PMID: 28641799BACKGROUND
  • Boriani G, Pieragnoli P, Botto GL, Puererfellner H, Mont L, Ziacchi M, Manolis AS, Gulizia M, Tukkie R, Landolina M, Ricciardi G, Cicconelli M, Grammatico A, Biffi M. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial. Europace. 2019 Apr 1;21(4):636-644. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy286.

    PMID: 30649270BACKGROUND
  • Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Chung ES, Li P, Christman SA, St John Sutton M. Improvement in Clinical Outcomes With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing: The BLOCK HF Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 10;67(18):2148-2157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.051.

    PMID: 27151347BACKGROUND
  • Beck H, Curtis AB. Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016 Oct;13(5):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0299-3.

    PMID: 27553893BACKGROUND
  • Sharma PS, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Permanent His bundle pacing: shaping the future of physiological ventricular pacing. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Jan;17(1):22-36. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0224-z. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

    PMID: 31249403BACKGROUND
  • Vijayaraman P, Chung MK, Dandamudi G, Upadhyay GA, Krishnan K, Crossley G, Bova Campbell K, Lee BK, Refaat MM, Saksena S, Fisher JD, Lakkireddy D; ACC's Electrophysiology Council. His Bundle Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 21;72(8):927-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.017.

    PMID: 30115232BACKGROUND
  • Keene D, Arnold AD, Jastrzebski M, Burri H, Zweibel S, Crespo E, Chandrasekaran B, Bassi S, Joghetaei N, Swift M, Moskal P, Francis DP, Foley P, Shun-Shin MJ, Whinnett ZI. His bundle pacing, learning curve, procedure characteristics, safety, and feasibility: Insights from a large international observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):1984-1993. doi: 10.1111/jce.14064. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

    PMID: 31310403BACKGROUND
  • Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Kielbasa G, Czarnecka D. His-bundle pacing as a standard approach in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and bradycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1508-1512. doi: 10.1111/pace.13490. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

    PMID: 30192005BACKGROUND
  • Gu M, Hu Y, Hua W, Niu H, Chen X, Cai M, Zhang N, Li H, Zhou X, Zhang S. Visualization of tricuspid valve annulus for implantation of His bundle pacing in patients with symptomatic bradycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):2164-2169. doi: 10.1111/jce.14140. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

    PMID: 31456266BACKGROUND
  • Vijayaraman P, Dandamudi G. Anatomical approach to permanent His bundle pacing: Optimizing His bundle capture. J Electrocardiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;49(5):649-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

    PMID: 27457727BACKGROUND
  • Ponnusamy SS, Arora V, Namboodiri N, Kumar V, Kapoor A, Vijayaraman P. Left bundle branch pacing: A comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2462-2473. doi: 10.1111/jce.14681. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

    PMID: 32681681BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrioventricular BlockBundle-Branch Block

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart BlockArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • David Žižek, Assist. Prof.

    University Medical Centre Ljubljana

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

David Žižek, Assist. Prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of electro-stimulation program

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2021

First Posted

February 11, 2021

Study Start

February 4, 2021

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations