Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization of Colorectal Polyps
1 other identifier
observational
197
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Current guidelines recommend resection and histopathological analyses of all colorectal polyps. Real-time optical diagnosis can obviate non-neoplastic polyp resection ("diagnose-and-leave-behind") and histopathological analyses of diminutive polyps ("predict-resect-and-discard") reducing healthcare and cost burden. The investigators aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany) in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to endoscopic diagnosis with histopathology as the gold-standard. For this purpose, a single-centre prospective study of diminutive/small colorectal polyps is ongoing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2021
CompletedJuly 28, 2021
July 1, 2021
2 months
January 31, 2021
July 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps (CAD EYE® versus Histopathology)
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® system in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps by comparison with histopathological analysis
2 months
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps (Endoscopist versus Histopathology)
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® system in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to digital chromoendoscopy by endoscopists
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps size
2 months
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps location
2 months
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps histological type
2 months
Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to endoscopist experience
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopist characterization on WLI and BLI modes
Optical characterization of an identified polyp, first in WLI and then in BLI mode, with CAD EYE® OFF. This evaluation should be systematically performed by two independent endoscopists in the exam room, preferably (but not necessarily) an experienced endoscopist and a trainee. The presence of at least one experienced endoscopist is mandatory. An independent evaluation is guaranteed. First step - The 1st endoscopist (who performing colonoscopy) request the polyp evaluation and record written by the 2nd endoscopist (who not performing the colonoscopy) - blinded evaluation since 1st endoscopist doesn't verbalize his evaluation); 2nd step - when the 2nd endoscopist signals that he completed his record, the 1st endoscopist verbally explicit his classification, which is recorded by the 2nd endoscopist. This evaluation should include polyp histological type (hyperplastic, adenoma, sessile serrated lesion or other type) and the level of confidence of the evaluation performed (high or low).
CAD EYE® characterization on BLI mode
Optical characterization mode of CAD EYE® (CAD EYE® ON) in BLI mode should be activated for the evaluation of CAD EYE® optical characterization, in hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps, as well as the level of characterization (graduated from 1 to 3). The evaluation of the CAD EYE® should also be recorded by the endoscopist in the exam room who is not performing the colonoscopy, on its own record sheet. The iconographic record of evaluated polyps in WLI and BLI modes and the evaluation video using CAD EYE® in BLI characterization mode should be done.
Interventions
Methods plan Phase 1. Brief virtual chromoendoscopy training on the characterization of colorectal polyps (WLI, LCI and BLI) Phase 2. CAD EYE® system applied during colonoscopy retrieval: 2.1. CAD EYE® system OFF: Virtual chromoendoscopy (BLI) - independently characterization of a suspected polyp in WLI and BLI by the first endoscopist and by the second endoscopist (iconographic record) 2.2. CAD EYE® system ON: Characterization mode (BLI): Characterization of a suspected polyp by CAD EYE® and respectively level of characterization (1 to 3) (iconographic record) Phase 3. Histopathological evaluation (pathologist with gastrointestinal expertise): Resection and recovery of a suspected polyp for anatomopathological characterization
Eligibility Criteria
The total number of consecutive patients who underwent elective colonoscopy with high quality of bowel preparation (at least two points per segment and at least of six points at the total score of Boston Bowel Preparation), performed at the Gastroenterology Department of the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal, with at least one identified colorectal polyp, regardless the indication for its performance.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years;
- The presence of at least one polyp in an elective colonoscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- Poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score \<6 at the total score or \<2 at one of colorectal segment);
- No recovery of excised polyps for histopathological analysis;
- The presence of polyps not amenable to endoscopic excision or with contraindication for their excision at the time of colonoscopy;
- The absence of explicit indication for colonoscopy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal
Related Publications (19)
Pan J, Xin L, Ma YF, Hu LH, Li ZS. Colonoscopy Reduces Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Non-Malignant Findings: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):355-65. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.418. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
PMID: 26753884BACKGROUNDBretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Loberg M, Zauber AG, Regula J, Kuipers EJ, Hernan MA, McFadden E, Sunde A, Kalager M, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Garborg K, Rupinski M, Spaander MC, Bugajski M, Hoie O, Stefansson T, Hoff G, Adami HO; Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) Study Group. Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
PMID: 27214731BACKGROUNDZorzi M, Senore C, Da Re F, Barca A, Bonelli LA, Cannizzaro R, de Pretis G, Di Furia L, Di Giulio E, Mantellini P, Naldoni C, Sassatelli R, Rex DK, Zappa M, Hassan C; Equipe Working Group. Detection rate and predictive factors of sessile serrated polyps in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Gut. 2017 Jul;66(7):1233-1240. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310587. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
PMID: 26896459BACKGROUNDKaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
PMID: 20463339BACKGROUNDCorley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
PMID: 24693890BACKGROUNDvan Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
PMID: 16454841BACKGROUNDKaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, Hoff G, Jover R, Suchanek S, Ferlitsch M, Anderson J, Roesch T, Hultcranz R, Racz I, Kuipers EJ, Garborg K, East JE, Rupinski M, Seip B, Bennett C, Senore C, Minozzi S, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Spada C, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28507745BACKGROUNDFerlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PMID: 28212588BACKGROUNDMin M, Su S, He W, Bi Y, Ma Z, Liu Y. Computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps using linked color imaging colonoscopy to predict histology. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 27;9(1):2881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39416-7.
PMID: 30814661BACKGROUNDBrenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J, Rosch T, Pox C, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
PMID: 25911510BACKGROUNDvan der Zander QEW, Schreuder RM, Fonolla R, Scheeve T, van der Sommen F, Winkens B, Aepli P, Hayee B, Pischel AB, Stefanovic M, Subramaniam S, Bhandari P, de With PHN, Masclee AAM, Schoon EJ. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyp images using a newly developed computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) compared with intuitive optical diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2021 Dec;53(12):1219-1226. doi: 10.1055/a-1343-1597. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
PMID: 33368056BACKGROUNDWeigt J, Repici A, Antonelli G, Afifi A, Kliegis L, Correale L, Hassan C, Neumann H. Performance of a new integrated computer-assisted system (CADe/CADx) for detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):180-184. doi: 10.1055/a-1372-0419. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33494106BACKGROUNDLui TKL, Guo CG, Leung WK. Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):11-22.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.033. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
PMID: 32119938BACKGROUNDvan de Wetering AJP, Meulen LWT, Bogie RMM, van der Zander QEW, Reumkens A, Winkens B, Cheng HR, Straathof JA, Dekker E, Keulen E, Bakker CM, Hoge C, de Ridder R, Masclee AAM, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S. Optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps in the Dutch Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Are we ready to start? Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E257-E265. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4853. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
PMID: 32118099BACKGROUNDSong EM, Park B, Ha CA, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Kim N, Byeon JS. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment planning for colorectal polyps using a deep-learning model. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56697-0.
PMID: 31913337BACKGROUNDJin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Seo JY, Yang JI, Yang SY, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Choi JM, Han YM, Kang SJ, Lee J, Chan Kim H, Kim JS. Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2169-2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
PMID: 32119927BACKGROUNDZachariah R, Samarasena J, Luba D, Duh E, Dao T, Requa J, Ninh A, Karnes W. Prediction of Polyp Pathology Using Convolutional Neural Networks Achieves "Resect and Discard" Thresholds. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;115(1):138-144. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000429.
PMID: 31651444BACKGROUNDKudo SE, Mori Y, Misawa M, Takeda K, Kudo T, Itoh H, Oda M, Mori K. Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy: Current status and future perspectives. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jul;31(4):363-371. doi: 10.1111/den.13340. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
PMID: 30624835BACKGROUNDAhmad OF, Soares AS, Mazomenos E, Brandao P, Vega R, Seward E, Stoyanov D, Chand M, Lovat LB. Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;4(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30282-6. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
PMID: 30527583BACKGROUND
Related Links
- World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Global Cancer Observatory 2018: estimated cancer incidence and mortality worldwide in 2018. \[homepage on the internet\]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr
- CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany)
- CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany)
- CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany)
- CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany)
Biospecimen
Colorectal polyps
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisa Gravito-Soares, MD
Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, EPE
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2021
First Posted
February 11, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 28, 2021
Study Completion
April 30, 2021
Last Updated
July 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share