NCT04749277

Brief Summary

Current guidelines recommend resection and histopathological analyses of all colorectal polyps. Real-time optical diagnosis can obviate non-neoplastic polyp resection ("diagnose-and-leave-behind") and histopathological analyses of diminutive polyps ("predict-resect-and-discard") reducing healthcare and cost burden. The investigators aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany) in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to endoscopic diagnosis with histopathology as the gold-standard. For this purpose, a single-centre prospective study of diminutive/small colorectal polyps is ongoing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
197

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2021

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 26, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceColonoscopyColonic Polyps

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps (CAD EYE® versus Histopathology)

    To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® system in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps by comparison with histopathological analysis

    2 months

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps (Endoscopist versus Histopathology)

    To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® system in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to digital chromoendoscopy by endoscopists

    2 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps size

    2 months

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps location

    2 months

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to polyps histological type

    2 months

  • Real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps according to endoscopist experience

    2 months

Study Arms (2)

Endoscopist characterization on WLI and BLI modes

Optical characterization of an identified polyp, first in WLI and then in BLI mode, with CAD EYE® OFF. This evaluation should be systematically performed by two independent endoscopists in the exam room, preferably (but not necessarily) an experienced endoscopist and a trainee. The presence of at least one experienced endoscopist is mandatory. An independent evaluation is guaranteed. First step - The 1st endoscopist (who performing colonoscopy) request the polyp evaluation and record written by the 2nd endoscopist (who not performing the colonoscopy) - blinded evaluation since 1st endoscopist doesn't verbalize his evaluation); 2nd step - when the 2nd endoscopist signals that he completed his record, the 1st endoscopist verbally explicit his classification, which is recorded by the 2nd endoscopist. This evaluation should include polyp histological type (hyperplastic, adenoma, sessile serrated lesion or other type) and the level of confidence of the evaluation performed (high or low).

CAD EYE® characterization on BLI mode

Optical characterization mode of CAD EYE® (CAD EYE® ON) in BLI mode should be activated for the evaluation of CAD EYE® optical characterization, in hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps, as well as the level of characterization (graduated from 1 to 3). The evaluation of the CAD EYE® should also be recorded by the endoscopist in the exam room who is not performing the colonoscopy, on its own record sheet. The iconographic record of evaluated polyps in WLI and BLI modes and the evaluation video using CAD EYE® in BLI characterization mode should be done.

Other: CAD EYE® (Fujifilm, Europe, Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Dusseldorf, Germany)

Interventions

Methods plan Phase 1. Brief virtual chromoendoscopy training on the characterization of colorectal polyps (WLI, LCI and BLI) Phase 2. CAD EYE® system applied during colonoscopy retrieval: 2.1. CAD EYE® system OFF: Virtual chromoendoscopy (BLI) - independently characterization of a suspected polyp in WLI and BLI by the first endoscopist and by the second endoscopist (iconographic record) 2.2. CAD EYE® system ON: Characterization mode (BLI): Characterization of a suspected polyp by CAD EYE® and respectively level of characterization (1 to 3) (iconographic record) Phase 3. Histopathological evaluation (pathologist with gastrointestinal expertise): Resection and recovery of a suspected polyp for anatomopathological characterization

CAD EYE® characterization on BLI mode

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The total number of consecutive patients who underwent elective colonoscopy with high quality of bowel preparation (at least two points per segment and at least of six points at the total score of Boston Bowel Preparation), performed at the Gastroenterology Department of the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal, with at least one identified colorectal polyp, regardless the indication for its performance.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • The presence of at least one polyp in an elective colonoscopy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score \<6 at the total score or \<2 at one of colorectal segment);
  • No recovery of excised polyps for histopathological analysis;
  • The presence of polyps not amenable to endoscopic excision or with contraindication for their excision at the time of colonoscopy;
  • The absence of explicit indication for colonoscopy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra

Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Pan J, Xin L, Ma YF, Hu LH, Li ZS. Colonoscopy Reduces Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Non-Malignant Findings: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):355-65. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.418. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

    PMID: 26753884BACKGROUND
  • Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Loberg M, Zauber AG, Regula J, Kuipers EJ, Hernan MA, McFadden E, Sunde A, Kalager M, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Garborg K, Rupinski M, Spaander MC, Bugajski M, Hoie O, Stefansson T, Hoff G, Adami HO; Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) Study Group. Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.

    PMID: 27214731BACKGROUND
  • Zorzi M, Senore C, Da Re F, Barca A, Bonelli LA, Cannizzaro R, de Pretis G, Di Furia L, Di Giulio E, Mantellini P, Naldoni C, Sassatelli R, Rex DK, Zappa M, Hassan C; Equipe Working Group. Detection rate and predictive factors of sessile serrated polyps in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Gut. 2017 Jul;66(7):1233-1240. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310587. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

    PMID: 26896459BACKGROUND
  • Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.

    PMID: 20463339BACKGROUND
  • Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.

    PMID: 24693890BACKGROUND
  • van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.

    PMID: 16454841BACKGROUND
  • Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, Hoff G, Jover R, Suchanek S, Ferlitsch M, Anderson J, Roesch T, Hultcranz R, Racz I, Kuipers EJ, Garborg K, East JE, Rupinski M, Seip B, Bennett C, Senore C, Minozzi S, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Spada C, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

    PMID: 28507745BACKGROUND
  • Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

    PMID: 28212588BACKGROUND
  • Min M, Su S, He W, Bi Y, Ma Z, Liu Y. Computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps using linked color imaging colonoscopy to predict histology. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 27;9(1):2881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39416-7.

    PMID: 30814661BACKGROUND
  • Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J, Rosch T, Pox C, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

    PMID: 25911510BACKGROUND
  • van der Zander QEW, Schreuder RM, Fonolla R, Scheeve T, van der Sommen F, Winkens B, Aepli P, Hayee B, Pischel AB, Stefanovic M, Subramaniam S, Bhandari P, de With PHN, Masclee AAM, Schoon EJ. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyp images using a newly developed computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) compared with intuitive optical diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2021 Dec;53(12):1219-1226. doi: 10.1055/a-1343-1597. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

    PMID: 33368056BACKGROUND
  • Weigt J, Repici A, Antonelli G, Afifi A, Kliegis L, Correale L, Hassan C, Neumann H. Performance of a new integrated computer-assisted system (CADe/CADx) for detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):180-184. doi: 10.1055/a-1372-0419. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

    PMID: 33494106BACKGROUND
  • Lui TKL, Guo CG, Leung WK. Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):11-22.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.033. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

    PMID: 32119938BACKGROUND
  • van de Wetering AJP, Meulen LWT, Bogie RMM, van der Zander QEW, Reumkens A, Winkens B, Cheng HR, Straathof JA, Dekker E, Keulen E, Bakker CM, Hoge C, de Ridder R, Masclee AAM, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S. Optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps in the Dutch Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Are we ready to start? Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E257-E265. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4853. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

    PMID: 32118099BACKGROUND
  • Song EM, Park B, Ha CA, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Kim N, Byeon JS. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment planning for colorectal polyps using a deep-learning model. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56697-0.

    PMID: 31913337BACKGROUND
  • Jin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Seo JY, Yang JI, Yang SY, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Choi JM, Han YM, Kang SJ, Lee J, Chan Kim H, Kim JS. Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2169-2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

    PMID: 32119927BACKGROUND
  • Zachariah R, Samarasena J, Luba D, Duh E, Dao T, Requa J, Ninh A, Karnes W. Prediction of Polyp Pathology Using Convolutional Neural Networks Achieves "Resect and Discard" Thresholds. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;115(1):138-144. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000429.

    PMID: 31651444BACKGROUND
  • Kudo SE, Mori Y, Misawa M, Takeda K, Kudo T, Itoh H, Oda M, Mori K. Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy: Current status and future perspectives. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jul;31(4):363-371. doi: 10.1111/den.13340. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

    PMID: 30624835BACKGROUND
  • Ahmad OF, Soares AS, Mazomenos E, Brandao P, Vega R, Seward E, Stoyanov D, Chand M, Lovat LB. Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;4(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30282-6. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

    PMID: 30527583BACKGROUND

Related Links

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Colorectal polyps

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal PolypsPolypsPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Elisa Gravito-Soares, MD

    Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, EPE

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2021

First Posted

February 11, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 28, 2021

Study Completion

April 30, 2021

Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations