3D-printed Bone Models in Addition to CT Imaging for Intra-articular Fracture Repair
SPRINT
Sterilised 3D-PRINTed Bone Models in Addition to Conventional CT Imaging for Operative Visualisation in Complex Intra-articular Fracture Repair - A Multi-centre, Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3D-printed bone models in addition to CT imaging versus CT imaging alone on surgical quality and operation time for patients undergoing surgical repair of intra-articular fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
3.8 years
February 5, 2021
July 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of articular surface reduction grading assessed by three-point scale
The quality of articular surface reduction will be rated by two surgeons blinded to intervention allotment assessing post-operative and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. The Kappa value will be recorded for inter-observer agreement between two observers (1. Perfect reduction, 2. Observable imperfections 1-2mm, 3. Significant imperfections \>2mm)
Immediately post-operation
Skin to skin duration of surgery (minutes)
The skin to skin duration of the surgery will be recorded.
Immediately post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total fluoroscopy time (seconds)
Immediately post-operation
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)
Immediately post-operation
Total length of skin incision (mm)
Immediately post-operation
Total tourniquet time (minutes)
Immediately post-operation
Incidence of surgical complications
3 months post-operation
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
3D-printed models plus CT imaging
EXPERIMENTALFracture repair surgery using sterilized 3DP models, CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization
CT imaging alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORFracture repair surgery using CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization
Interventions
In addition to CT-MPR and CT-3DR, 3DP models will be used for surgical planning and intraoperative visualization.
CT-MPR and CT-3DR used for surgical planning and intraoperative visualization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 years or older
- with intra-articular fracture of the proximal or distal humerus, proximal ulna, proximal radius, distal femur, or proximal or distal tibia (pilon fracture)
- requiring anticipated surgical repair of fracture
- with pre-operative CT scan already available as part of routine assessment
You may not qualify if:
- pathological fracture
- multiple fractures requiring simultaneous or staged operations
- requiring surgery within 24 hours of admission
- unable or unwilling to give consent to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (18)
Jupiter JB, Fernandez DL, Toh CL, Fellman T, Ring D. Operative treatment of volar intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1817-28. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00004.
PMID: 8986658BACKGROUNDKang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;34(3):312-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3413. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
PMID: 26878319BACKGROUNDYou W, Liu LJ, Chen HX, Xiong JY, Wang DM, Huang JH, Ding JL, Wang DP. Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
PMID: 27521179BACKGROUNDYang L, Shang XW, Fan JN, He ZX, Wang JJ, Liu M, Zhuang Y, Ye C. Application of 3D Printing in the Surgical Planning of Trimalleolar Fracture and Doctor-Patient Communication. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2482086. doi: 10.1155/2016/2482086. Epub 2016 Jul 3.
PMID: 27446944BACKGROUNDKacl GM, Zanetti M, Amgwerd M, Trentz O, Seifert B, Stucki H, Hodler J. Rapid prototyping (stereolithography) in the management of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(2):187-91. doi: 10.1007/s003300050132.
PMID: 9038112BACKGROUNDYan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY, Chan PK, Fang CX. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3637-45. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
PMID: 25217311BACKGROUNDYang J, Cai H, Lv J, Zhang K, Leng H, Sun C, Wang Z, Liu Z. In vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):E486-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000211.
PMID: 24430723BACKGROUNDPeltola SM, Melchels FP, Grijpma DW, Kellomaki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40(4):268-80. doi: 10.1080/07853890701881788.
PMID: 18428020BACKGROUNDBrown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, DeCoster TA, Reyna JR Jr, Moneim M. Rapid prototyping: the future of trauma surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:49-55. No abstract available.
PMID: 14652393BACKGROUNDHurson C, Tansey A, O'Donnchadha B, Nicholson P, Rice J, McElwain J. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury. 2007 Oct;38(10):1158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
PMID: 17884058BACKGROUNDBizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A, Spiegel A, Romani D, Corain M, Adani R, Magnan B. 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):976-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 26876530BACKGROUNDLi Z, Li Z, Xu R, Li M, Li J, Liu Y, Sui D, Zhang W, Chen Z. Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture--A randomized controlled study in China. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 23;5:11570. doi: 10.1038/srep11570.
PMID: 26099838BACKGROUNDFang C, Fang B, Wong TM, Lau TW, Pun T, Leung F. Fixing a fractured arthrodesed hip with rapid prototype templating and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. Trauma Case Rep. 2015 Nov 14;1(9-12):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2015.10.005. eCollection 2015 Dec.
PMID: 30101181BACKGROUNDWong TM, Jin J, Lau TW, Fang C, Yan CH, Yeung K, To M, Leung F. The use of three-dimensional printing technology in orthopaedic surgery. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499016684077. doi: 10.1177/2309499016684077.
PMID: 28142354BACKGROUNDFedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
PMID: 22770690BACKGROUNDSuresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82352.
PMID: 21772732BACKGROUNDRennie D. CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):2006-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.2006. No abstract available.
PMID: 11308440BACKGROUNDZarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Califf RM, Ide NC. The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):852-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012065.
PMID: 21366476BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Fang
Dept of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are randomly assigned to either one of the interventional arm and will not be informed of the randomisation result. A blinded reviewer will assess the postoperative radiographs and surgical quality.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2021
First Posted
February 10, 2021
Study Start
March 13, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Within 1 year of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Additional information available upon reasonable request of principal investigator
Anonymized dataset to be included as supplementary data in final publication