NCT04748016

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3D-printed bone models in addition to CT imaging versus CT imaging alone on surgical quality and operation time for patients undergoing surgical repair of intra-articular fractures.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 13, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 10, 2021

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

February 5, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

3D PrintingIntra-articular FracturePatient-specific instrumentation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Quality of articular surface reduction grading assessed by three-point scale

    The quality of articular surface reduction will be rated by two surgeons blinded to intervention allotment assessing post-operative and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. The Kappa value will be recorded for inter-observer agreement between two observers (1. Perfect reduction, 2. Observable imperfections 1-2mm, 3. Significant imperfections \>2mm)

    Immediately post-operation

  • Skin to skin duration of surgery (minutes)

    The skin to skin duration of the surgery will be recorded.

    Immediately post-operation

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Total fluoroscopy time (seconds)

    Immediately post-operation

  • Intraoperative blood loss (mL)

    Immediately post-operation

  • Total length of skin incision (mm)

    Immediately post-operation

  • Total tourniquet time (minutes)

    Immediately post-operation

  • Incidence of surgical complications

    3 months post-operation

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

3D-printed models plus CT imaging

EXPERIMENTAL

Fracture repair surgery using sterilized 3DP models, CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization

Other: 3D printed (3DP) bone models + CT imaging

CT imaging alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fracture repair surgery using CT-MPR and CT-3DR for planning and intraoperative visualization

Other: CT imaging

Interventions

In addition to CT-MPR and CT-3DR, 3DP models will be used for surgical planning and intraoperative visualization.

3D-printed models plus CT imaging

CT-MPR and CT-3DR used for surgical planning and intraoperative visualization.

CT imaging alone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 18 years or older
  • with intra-articular fracture of the proximal or distal humerus, proximal ulna, proximal radius, distal femur, or proximal or distal tibia (pilon fracture)
  • requiring anticipated surgical repair of fracture
  • with pre-operative CT scan already available as part of routine assessment

You may not qualify if:

  • pathological fracture
  • multiple fractures requiring simultaneous or staged operations
  • requiring surgery within 24 hours of admission
  • unable or unwilling to give consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

RECRUITING

Related Publications (18)

  • Jupiter JB, Fernandez DL, Toh CL, Fellman T, Ring D. Operative treatment of volar intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1817-28. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00004.

    PMID: 8986658BACKGROUND
  • Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;34(3):312-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3413. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

    PMID: 26878319BACKGROUND
  • You W, Liu LJ, Chen HX, Xiong JY, Wang DM, Huang JH, Ding JL, Wang DP. Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

    PMID: 27521179BACKGROUND
  • Yang L, Shang XW, Fan JN, He ZX, Wang JJ, Liu M, Zhuang Y, Ye C. Application of 3D Printing in the Surgical Planning of Trimalleolar Fracture and Doctor-Patient Communication. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2482086. doi: 10.1155/2016/2482086. Epub 2016 Jul 3.

    PMID: 27446944BACKGROUND
  • Kacl GM, Zanetti M, Amgwerd M, Trentz O, Seifert B, Stucki H, Hodler J. Rapid prototyping (stereolithography) in the management of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(2):187-91. doi: 10.1007/s003300050132.

    PMID: 9038112BACKGROUND
  • Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY, Chan PK, Fang CX. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3637-45. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2. Epub 2014 Sep 13.

    PMID: 25217311BACKGROUND
  • Yang J, Cai H, Lv J, Zhang K, Leng H, Sun C, Wang Z, Liu Z. In vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):E486-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000211.

    PMID: 24430723BACKGROUND
  • Peltola SM, Melchels FP, Grijpma DW, Kellomaki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40(4):268-80. doi: 10.1080/07853890701881788.

    PMID: 18428020BACKGROUND
  • Brown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, DeCoster TA, Reyna JR Jr, Moneim M. Rapid prototyping: the future of trauma surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:49-55. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14652393BACKGROUND
  • Hurson C, Tansey A, O'Donnchadha B, Nicholson P, Rice J, McElwain J. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury. 2007 Oct;38(10):1158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Sep 19.

    PMID: 17884058BACKGROUND
  • Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A, Spiegel A, Romani D, Corain M, Adani R, Magnan B. 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):976-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26876530BACKGROUND
  • Li Z, Li Z, Xu R, Li M, Li J, Liu Y, Sui D, Zhang W, Chen Z. Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture--A randomized controlled study in China. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 23;5:11570. doi: 10.1038/srep11570.

    PMID: 26099838BACKGROUND
  • Fang C, Fang B, Wong TM, Lau TW, Pun T, Leung F. Fixing a fractured arthrodesed hip with rapid prototype templating and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. Trauma Case Rep. 2015 Nov 14;1(9-12):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2015.10.005. eCollection 2015 Dec.

    PMID: 30101181BACKGROUND
  • Wong TM, Jin J, Lau TW, Fang C, Yan CH, Yeung K, To M, Leung F. The use of three-dimensional printing technology in orthopaedic surgery. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499016684077. doi: 10.1177/2309499016684077.

    PMID: 28142354BACKGROUND
  • Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

    PMID: 22770690BACKGROUND
  • Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82352.

    PMID: 21772732BACKGROUND
  • Rennie D. CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):2006-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.2006. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11308440BACKGROUND
  • Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Califf RM, Ide NC. The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):852-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012065.

    PMID: 21366476BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Humeral Fractures, DistalFemoral Fractures, DistalShoulder FracturesIntra-Articular Fractures

Interventions

Postmortem Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elbow FracturesElbow InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesHumeral FracturesFractures, BoneFemoral FracturesLeg InjuriesShoulder Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AutopsyDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic ImagingInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Christian Fang

    Dept of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Christian Fang

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants are randomly assigned to either one of the interventional arm and will not be informed of the randomisation result. A blinded reviewer will assess the postoperative radiographs and surgical quality.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double-blind randomised control trial with 40 patients in two interventional arm
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2021

First Posted

February 10, 2021

Study Start

March 13, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

July 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymized dataset to be included as supplementary data in final publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Within 1 year of study completion
Access Criteria
Additional information available upon reasonable request of principal investigator

Locations