Uterine Inflammatory Characteristics
1 other identifier
observational
163
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Data regarding fertility following niche repair is limited. It has been reported that a niche can reduce the chances of embryo implantation and may lead to spontaneous miscarriages if the implantation is close to or in the niche. One possible theory refers to inflammatory process at the area of the niche that harms the endometrial environment. Due to the aforementioned, the aim of our study is to compare the inflammatory characteristics of women with cesarean uterine scar to those without.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2025
CompletedApril 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
4.2 years
January 29, 2021
April 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of inflammatory cytokines ( Granulocyte Macrophage colony stimulating factor(GM-CSF), Interferone-GAMMA, Interleukin(IL)-1,IL-2,IL-5,IL-6,IL-7,IL13,IL-15, IL-17, IL-22, IL-23,IL-31,IL-33,IL-36, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) -ALPHA )
All parameters will be evaluated in picogram/milliliter
Through study completion, an estimated period of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Niche characteristics-Residual myometrial thickness
During sonographic evaluation performed immediately following diagnostic hysteroscopy
Niche characteristics-Adjacent myometrial thickness
During sonographic evaluation performed immediately following diagnostic hysteroscopy
Niche characteristics-Depth
During sonographic evaluation performed immediately following diagnostic hysteroscopy
Niche characteristics-Length
During sonographic evaluation performed immediately following diagnostic hysteroscopy
Study Arms (2)
Study Group: Women with low segment uterine scar following cesarean delivery
Women with low segment uterine scar following cesarean delivery, with no other abnormalities observed during diagnostic hysteroscopy
Cohort Group: Women with no uterine scar
Women with no uterine scar, with no other abnormalities observed during diagnostic hysteroscopy
Interventions
Collection of first 5 cc of normal saline from the output port during diagnostic hysteroscopy
Trans vaginal ultrasound performed immediately following the diagnostic hysteroscopy ( as sonohysterography)
Eligibility Criteria
Women with low segment uterine scar following cesarean delivery ( Study group ) and women with no uterine scar ( Controls), that have no abnormal finding on diagnostic hysterocopy.
You may qualify if:
- Fertility age 18-45
- No abnormal finding during hysteroscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Women with other uterine scars (following myomectomy, T/J scar)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, Israel
Related Publications (13)
van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):236-44. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12542.
PMID: 24373597RESULTNaji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, Smith A, Pexsters A, Stalder C, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Lees C, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):252-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.10077.
PMID: 21858885RESULTRoberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S, Bujold E. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):465-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PMID: 22399223RESULTVervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brolmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2695-702. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev240. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PMID: 26409016RESULTWang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405.
PMID: 19565535RESULTBrown K, Tkacz Z. Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic management of caesarean scar (niche) defects in symptomatic patients. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jul;38(5):730. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1444394.
PMID: 29944046RESULTVervoort AJ, Van der Voet LF, Witmer M, Thurkow AL, Radder CM, van Kesteren PJ, Quartero HW, Kuchenbecker WK, Bongers MY, Geomini PM, de Vleeschouwer LH, van Hooff MH, van Vliet HA, Veersema S, Renes WB, van Meurs HS, Bosmans J, Oude Rengerink K, Brolmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2015 Nov 12;15:103. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0260-8.
PMID: 26563197RESULTvan der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, BijdeVaate AJ, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):145-56. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12537.
PMID: 24373589RESULTHemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy--a review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;10(4):366-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1996.tb00062.x.
PMID: 8931052RESULTNaji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Saso S, Stalder C, Van Huffel S, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1489-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
PMID: 23585560RESULTGurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1943-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det130. Epub 2013 May 3.
PMID: 23644593RESULTVissers J, Hehenkamp W, Lambalk CB, Huirne JA. Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jul 1;35(7):1484-1494. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa094.
PMID: 32613231RESULTVitale SG, Ludwin A, Vilos GA, Torok P, Tesarik J, Vitagliano A, Lasmar RB, Chiofalo B. From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;301(1):33-52. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05438-0. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
PMID: 31989288RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aya M Mohr-Sasson, M.D
Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2021
First Posted
February 10, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 7, 2025
Study Completion
April 7, 2025
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04