DOuble-BAlloon Versus PROstaglandin E2 for Cervical Ripening in Low Risk Pregnancies
DOBA-PRO
The Effectiveness and Safety of Double-balloon Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin for Cervical Ripening in Women With Low-risk Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DOBA-PRO)
1 other identifier
interventional
540
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the effectiveness and safety of double balloon catheter and vaginal insert Prostaglandin E2 in cervical ripening prior to Induction of Labor in low-risk women from 39+0 to 40+6 weeks of gestation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 1, 2024
February 1, 2024
4 years
January 22, 2021
February 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants delivered vaginally
Number of participants delivered vaginally
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (37)
Number of participants with Side - effect of induction's method
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after induction
Number of participants using more than one induction agent required
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after induction
Number of participants having oxytocin augmentation
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after induction
Number of participants with uterine tachysystole
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after induction
Time from induction of labor to delivery
From induction until delivery, assessed up to 3 days after induction
- +32 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Double-balloon catheter group
OTHERSweeping the membranes by UTAH CVX-RIPE® (Utah Medical Products, Inc, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah 84047 USA).
Vaginal insertion Prostaglandin E2 group
OTHERPropess® 10mg Vaginal delivery system (Ferring Controlled Therapeutics Ltd., 1 Redwood Place, Peel Park Campus, East Kilbride, Glasgow, G74 5PB, UK) is a vaginal insert containing 10mg of dinoprostone in a timed-release formulation (the medication is released at 0.3 mg/hour).
Interventions
Sweeping the membranes by UTAH CVX-RIPE® (Utah Medical Products, Inc, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah 84047 USA). The catheter will be inserted manually until the proximal balloon is in the cervical canal, the distal balloon should be intrauterine and in the extra-amniotic space. The intrauterine balloon is inflated with 40mL saline and retracted so that it rests against the internal oz. The proximal balloon should now be outside the external oz and is inflated with 20mL saline. If the balloons are correctly situated on both ends of the cervix, they can be inflated with up to 80mL saline each. Cardiotocograph will be performed 30min, 2 hours after insertion and every 6 hours. The balloon is placed for a maximum of 24 hours. If it is expelled in the first 12 hours and the patient has no contractions or still shows an unfavorable cervix, another balloon is placed for a maximum of another 24 hours. The patients will be examined in case of extremely painful or membranes ruptured.
Propess® 10mg Vaginal delivery system (Ferring Controlled Therapeutics Ltd., 1 Redwood Place, Peel Park Campus, East Kilbride, Glasgow, G74 5PB, UK) is a vaginal insert containing 10mg of dinoprostone in a timed-release formulation (the medication is released at 0.3 mg/hour). A Propess vaginal system is inserted by a research doctors. As in the catheter procedure, Fetal Heart Rate is monitored 30min before and 2 hours after placement. Cardiotocograph and vaginal examination will be performed every 6 hours. The vaginal system is placed for a maximum of 24 hours. If it is expelled in the first 12 hours and the patient has no contractions or still shows an unfavorable cervix, another vaginal system is placed for a maximum of another 24 hours. The patients will be examined in case of extreme pain or membranes ruptured.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Maternal age ≥ 18
- Singleton pregnancy. Twin gestation reduced to singleton, either spontaneously or therapeutically, is not eligible unless the reduction occurred before 14 weeks gestational age.
- Gestational age at randomization from at 39+0 to 40+6 weeks of gestation.
- Cephalic presentation
- Intact membrane
- Unfavourable cervix (Bishop\<6)
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Maternal medical illness associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome (any diabetes mellitus, any hypertensive disorders, cardiac diseases, renal insufficiency, systemic lupus erythematosus, mental disorders, HIV positive, use of heparin or low-molecular weight heparin during the current pregnancy etc.)
- Abnormal placenta: Active vaginal bleeding greater than bloody show or placenta previa, accreta or vasa previa
- Abnormal amniotic fluid volume:
- Oligohydramnios (MVP \< 2cm)
- Polyhydramnios (MVP \> 10cm)
- Abnormal fetus
- Fetal demise or known major fetal anomalies
- Fetal growth restriction (FGR) (EFW \< 3% or \< 10% and abnormal Doppler)
- Non-reassuring fetal status (no fetal movements, abnormal fetal heart rate at auscultation)
- Previous C-section
- Planned for C-section or contra-indication to labour
- Cerclage or use of pessary in current pregnancy
- Refusal of blood product.
- Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labour at delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitallead
- Mỹ Đức Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
Hanoi, Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam
Related Publications (10)
Du YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):891-899. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14256. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
PMID: 27533177BACKGROUNDLiu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, Wang XY. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4929-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
PMID: 30315411BACKGROUNDde Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3.
PMID: 31623014BACKGROUNDShechter-Maor G, Haran G, Sadeh-Mestechkin D, Ganor-Paz Y, Fejgin MD, Biron-Shental T. Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios. J Perinatol. 2015 Feb;35(2):95-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.173. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
PMID: 25275693BACKGROUNDDu C, Liu Y, Liu Y, Ding H, Zhang R, Tan J. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3547-3. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
PMID: 25408273BACKGROUNDWang W, Zheng J, Fu J, Zhang X, Ma Q, Yu S, Li M, Hou L. Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1805-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.880880. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
PMID: 24397441BACKGROUNDCromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Agosti M, Serati M, Marchitelli G, Bolis P. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):125.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
PMID: 22704766BACKGROUNDSuffecool K, Rosenn BM, Kam S, Mushi J, Foroutan J, Herrera K. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Perinat Med. 2014 Mar;42(2):213-8. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0152.
PMID: 24096438BACKGROUNDGrobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
PMID: 30089070BACKGROUNDDos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, Mol BW, Gale C, Devane D, Van't Hooft J, Johnson MJ, Hogg M, Thangaratinam S. Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study. BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1673-1680. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15397. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
PMID: 29981523BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ben W Mol, PhD. MD
Monash University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anh Nguyen Duy, PhD. MD
Hanoi Obstetric and Gynecology Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vinh Dang Quang, PhD. MD
Mỹ Đức Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ha Nguyen Thi Thu, PhD. MD
Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2021
First Posted
February 10, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share