NCT04745260

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a combination of intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam to intranasal midazolam alone for analgesia and anxiolysis in patients presenting for facial laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2021

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 9, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Laceration repairFacial lacerationAnxietyMidazolamFentanyl

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Score (mYPAS)

    mYPAS score at time of positioning, to be completed by blinded researcher (provider) to assess anxiety level. Scores range from 22.5 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

    Pre-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Provider Satisfaction with Procedural Sedation (Visual Analog Score)

    Immediately after the procedure

  • Parent Satisfaction with Anxiolysis (Visual Analog Scale)

    Immediately after the procedure

  • Rate of Treatment Failure

    Immediately after the procedure

  • Duration of Procedure

    Immediately after the procedure

Study Arms (2)

Intranasal Midazolam and Intranasal Fentanyl

EXPERIMENTAL

Study participants assigned to the combination (experimental) group will receive a weight-based dose of intranasal Fentanyl (50mcg/mL concentration at 2mcg/kg up to 100mcg) followed by intranasal Midazolam (5mg/mL concentration at 0.2mg/kg up to 10mg) using a mucosal atomizer device (1mL syringe with an attached atomizer).

Drug: Intranasal Fentanyl Spray and Intranasal Midazolam Spray

Intranasal Midazolam

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study participants assigned to the control (active comparator) group will receive only intranasal Midazolam (5mg/mL concentration at 0.3mg/kg up to 10mg) using a mucosal atomizer device (1mL syringe with an attached atomizer).

Drug: Intranasal Midazolam Spray

Interventions

Intranasal Fentanyl 2mcg/kg and Intranasal Midazolam 0.2mg/kg

Also known as: Versed
Intranasal Midazolam and Intranasal Fentanyl

Intranasal Midazolam 0.3mg/kg

Also known as: Versed
Intranasal Midazolam

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Facial laceration requiring repair with sutures
  • English or Spanish-speaking parent/guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • Lacerations requiring IV sedation or subspecialist involvement
  • Patient has other injuries requiring medical attention
  • Patient has vital sign instability, per physician discretion
  • Patient has autism spectrum disorder
  • Patient has allergies to either medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Fein JA, Zempsky WT, Cravero JP; Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; American Academy of Pediatrics. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1391-405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2536. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

    PMID: 23109683BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy RM, Luhmann JD. The "ouchless emergency department". Getting closer: advances in decreasing distress during painful procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;46(6):1215-47, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70184-x.

    PMID: 10629683BACKGROUND
  • Miller JL, Capino AC, Thomas A, Couloures K, Johnson PN. Sedation and Analgesia Using Medications Delivered via the Extravascular Route in Children Undergoing Laceration Repair. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):72-83. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.2.72.

    PMID: 29720907BACKGROUND
  • Ryan PM, Kienstra AJ, Cosgrove P, Vezzetti R, Wilkinson M. Safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam and fentanyl used in combination in the pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):237-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.05.036. Epub 2018 May 17.

    PMID: 30146398BACKGROUND
  • Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD, Hofstadter MB. The Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how does it compare with a "gold standard"? Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):783-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00012.

    PMID: 9322455BACKGROUND
  • Kogan A, Katz J, Efrat R, Eidelman LA. Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Oct;12(8):685-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00918.x.

    PMID: 12472704BACKGROUND
  • Neville DN, Hayes KR, Ivan Y, McDowell ER, Pitetti RD. Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):910-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12998.

    PMID: 27129606BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders

Interventions

Midazolam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Brittany J DiFabio, MD

    University of Texas at Austin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Brittany J DiFabio, MD

CONTACT

Matthew Wilkinson, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A non-blinded researcher (physician) will determine the group to which the patient is assigned and order the medication(s) according to the assigned group. A separate blinded researcher (physician) will then perform the laceration repair, mYPAS, and post-procedure evaluations. The non-blinded researcher, nurse, parent, and patient will be advised not to disclose which medication(s) were administered to ensure blinding of the provider performing the laceration repair and assessment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2021

First Posted

February 9, 2021

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

November 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

February 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share