Comparison of Hypothermic Versus Normothermic Ex-vivo Preservation.
DCDNet
Optimization of an Evidence-based Organizational Model of Liver and Pancreas Transplant Using Cardiac Death Donors: a Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study for the Comparison of Hypothermic Versus Normothermic Ex-vivo Preservation.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study groups: The study is a multicenter (Pisa and Milan), prospective, randomized study comparing D-HOPE (HMP) vs NMP in DCD and ECD-DBD (extended criteria brain-dead donors). Once a DCD or a DBD with extended criteria (ECD-DBD) meets the inclusion criteria, they are randomized as follow:
- 1.20 liver grafts from DCD after normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) matching the inclusion criteria are randomized 1:1 to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then transplanted.
- 2.40 liver grafts from ECD-DBD matching the inclusion criteria are randomized 1:1 to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then transplanted
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2023
CompletedJuly 26, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.8 years
January 18, 2021
July 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of graft loss
Death of patient, relisting or Retransplantation. Composite Outcome
at 6 months postoperatively
Rate of Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions (ITBL)
ITBL as assessed by MRI / MRCP. Composite Outcome
at 6 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
1-year graft survival
1-year postoperatively
1-year patients survival
1-year postoperatively
level of BCL-2/BAX at the liver histology
after 2 hours of perfusion
level of Soluble Keratin 18 in the perfusate
after 2 hours of perfusion
level of HMGB1in the perfusate
after 2 hours of perfusion
Study Arms (2)
Hypothermic Machine Perfusion
EXPERIMENTALuDCD and cDCD after Normothermic Regional Perfusion matching the inclusion criteria, ECD matching the inclusion criteria, uDCD and cDCD exceeding the inclusion criteria.
Normothermic Machine Perfusion
EXPERIMENTALuDCD and cDCD after Normothermic Regional Perfusion matching the inclusion criteria, ECD matching the inclusion criteria, uDCD and cDCD exceeding the inclusion criteria.
Interventions
The perfusion system was primed with 4 L of Belzer machine perfusion solution University of Wisconsin Machine Perfusion Solution (Bridge for Life, Ltd., Columbia, SC). The arterial and portal pressures were set at 25 mm Hg with a flow and at 3-4 mm Hg with a continuous flow, respectively. The oxygen flow was set at 0.25 L/minute. The target liver temperature was between 4°C and 10°C.
Grafts were perfused at 37°C in an OR next to the transplant OR and under medical supervision using a blood-based perfusate. Initial perfusate temperature was set at 20°C and raised by 1°C every 2 minutes. Oxygenation was provided by an anesthesia ventilator initially set at 4 L/minute with 30% fraction of inspired oxygen, and later adjusted based on perfusate pH, partial pressure of oxygen, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide. Blood gas analyses were drawn every 20 minutes during the first hour and every 30 minutes thereafter with the aim to maintain a physiological pH and ionogram result, and a partial pressure of oxygen between 200 and 250 mm Hg. Perfusate glucose, transaminases, and lactate were measured during NMP as were bile production and quality (pH, sodium, glycemia, lactate, and HCO3)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DCD:
- no absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
- donor age ≤70 years
- witnessed and documented cardiac arrest
- macro-vescicular steatosis \<30% at liver biopsy
- necrosis \<5% at liver biopsy
- fibrosis \<2 as per Ishak's score at liver biopsy
- arteriolar thickening \<60% at liver biopsy
- WIT ≤160 minutes
- ALT \<1000 UI/L during NRP
- downward trend lactate during NRP
- DBD:
- no absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
- donor age \> 70 years
- macro-steatosis between 30 and 50% at liver biopsy
You may not qualify if:
- DCD:
- absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
- donor age \>70 years
- macro-vescicular steatosis \>30% at liver biopsy
- necrosis \>5% at liver biopsy
- fibrosis \>2 as per Ishak's score at liver biopsy
- severe macroangiopathy (arteriolar thickening \>60% at liver biopsy)
- WIT \>160 minutes
- ALT \>1000 UI/L during NRP
- uptrend lactate during NRP
- DBD:
- absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
- donor age \< 70 years
- macro-steatosis between \> 50% at liver biopsy
- RECIPIENTS
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UO Chirurgia Epatica e del Trapianto di Fegato
Pisa, 56124, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Ghinolfi D, Rreka E, De Tata V, Franzini M, Pezzati D, Fierabracci V, Masini M, Cacciatoinsilla A, Bindi ML, Marselli L, Mazzotti V, Morganti R, Marchetti P, Biancofiore G, Campani D, Paolicchi A, De Simone P. Pilot, Open, Randomized, Prospective Trial for Normothermic Machine Perfusion Evaluation in Liver Transplantation From Older Donors. Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):436-449. doi: 10.1002/lt.25362.
PMID: 30362649BACKGROUNDGhinolfi D, Dondossola D, Rreka E, Lonati C, Pezzati D, Cacciatoinsilla A, Kersik A, Lazzeri C, Zanella A, Peris A, Maggioni M, Biancofiore G, Reggiani P, Morganti R, De Simone P, Rossi G. Sequential Use of Normothermic Regional and Ex Situ Machine Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplant. Liver Transpl. 2021 Feb;27(3):385-402. doi: 10.1002/lt.25899. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
PMID: 32949117BACKGROUNDLazzeri C, Ghinolfi D, Santini LE, Procissi APO, Cultrera D, Peris A. Improved Utilization Rate in Solid Organ Donors >/=80 Years: The 7-Year Tuscany Experience. Clin Transplant. 2025 Apr;39(4):e70142. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70142.
PMID: 40145941DERIVEDTingle SJ, Thompson ER, Figueiredo RS, Moir JA, Goodfellow M, Talbot D, Wilson CH. Normothermic and hypothermic machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 9;7(7):CD011671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011671.pub3.
PMID: 38979743DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2021
First Posted
February 9, 2021
Study Start
December 15, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share