Conservative or Operative Therapy in Patients With a Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In our society the population consists of more elderly patients. Medical treatment needs to be adjusted to this patient group. This research project focusses on patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis. This results from a minor trauma and can cause a long immobilization period because of severe pain. For FFP type II b and II c there is no consensus on the best treatment option. Either a surgical minimal invasive sacroiliac osteosynthesis or conservative treatment is a possibility. Of course, both treatment options have pros and cons. This research project will randomize all patients with a FFP IIb or IIc fracture in either surgical or conservative treatment. These treatments will be evaluated at the follow-ups, 4 weeks, 4 months and 1 year after trauma. This will be evaluated with the DEMMI, Accelerometer, EQ-5D (EuroQol Quality of Live Questionnaire), radiological results, range of motion, pain-levels and reporting any postoperative complications or adverse events. Patient will be included over a period of 18 months and will be followed for at least a year. This research project aim to answer the question which treatment option for FFP type IIb and IIc is the most adequate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2023
October 1, 2023
2.2 years
December 10, 2020
October 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mobility level
DEMMI (0-100, 100 is maximal mobility)
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Pain levels
1 year
Clinical characteristics
Baseline
Clinical characteristics
Baseline
Clinical characteristics
Baseline
Clinical characteristics
Baseline, 1 year
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Surgical
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical treatment using a minimal invasive surgical method. At our hospital we perform a percutaneous sacroiliac osteosynthesis using cannulated, perforated and fenestrated screws. This procedure is preferably performed in our hybrid operation theatre, which allows for correct placement using an intraoperative CT-scan.
Conservative
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive individually tailored physiotherapy and analgesics if necessary.
Interventions
Patients will either be randomized in the surgical or conservative group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- The fracture must be a fragility fracture. This means absence of high energy trauma.
You may not qualify if:
- Able to walk 4 meters before fracture
- Patients who had a high energy trauma.
- FFP I or FFP III+IV were operative therapy is recommended
- Patient who are not operable according to the anaesthesiologist on call.
- Open fractures.
- Revision surgeries.
- Absent contact information
- Living abroad and cannot participate in follow-up visits.
- Withdrawal from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland
Related Publications (18)
Oberkircher L, Ruchholtz S, Rommens PM, Hofmann A, Bucking B, Kruger A. Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Feb 2;115(5):70-80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0070.
PMID: 29439771BACKGROUNDFuchs T, Rottbeck U, Hofbauer V, Raschke M, Stange R. [Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly. Underestimated osteoporotic fracture]. Unfallchirurg. 2011 Aug;114(8):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-2020-z. German.
PMID: 21800137BACKGROUNDRommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. [Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvic ring]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Jun;150(3):e107-18; quiz e119-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1314948. Epub 2012 Jun 21. German.
PMID: 22723074BACKGROUNDRommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1733-44. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
PMID: 23871193BACKGROUNDMatta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 May;(242):83-97.
PMID: 2706863BACKGROUNDRommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Sept-Oct;112(5):524-537. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.5.524.
PMID: 29088552BACKGROUNDRichter PH, Gebhard F, Dehner C, Scola A. Accuracy of computer-assisted iliosacral screw placement using a hybrid operating room. Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
PMID: 26708797BACKGROUNDWahnert D, Raschke MJ, Fuchs T. Cement augmentation of the navigated iliosacral screw in the treatment of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum: a new method using modified implants. Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1147-50. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1875-8. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
PMID: 23553117BACKGROUNDRoutt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ. Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Nov;11(8):584-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199711000-00007.
PMID: 9415865BACKGROUNDKonig MA, Hediger S, Schmitt JW, Jentzsch T, Sprengel K, Werner CML. In-screw cement augmentation for iliosacral screw fixation in posterior ring pathologies with insufficient bone stock. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0681-6. Epub 2016 May 11.
PMID: 27167237BACKGROUNDWagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D, Hofmann A, Rommens PM. Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug;41(4):349-62. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0530-z. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
PMID: 26038048BACKGROUNDHopf JC, Krieglstein CF, Muller LP, Koslowsky TC. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after osteoporotic posterior ring fractures of the pelvis reduces pain significantly in elderly patients. Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 May 14.
PMID: 26052052BACKGROUNDKonig A, Oberkircher L, Beeres FJP, Babst R, Ruchholtz S, Link BC. Cement augmentation of sacroiliac screws in fragility fractures of the pelvic ring-A synopsis and systematic review of the current literature. Injury. 2019 Aug;50(8):1411-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
PMID: 31301810BACKGROUNDHobart JC, Thompson AJ. The five item Barthel index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;71(2):225-30. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.225.
PMID: 11459898BACKGROUNDde Morton NA, Davidson M, Keating JL. The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI): an essential health index for an ageing world. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Aug 19;6:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-63.
PMID: 18713451BACKGROUNDRuhle A, Oehme F, Link BC, Metzger J, Fischer H, Stickel M, Delagrammaticas DE, Babst R, Beeres FJP. Swiss chocolate and free beverages to increase the motivation for scientific work amongst residents: a prospective interventional study in a non-academic teaching hospital in Switzerland. Trials. 2020 Jan 13;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3956-5.
PMID: 31931852BACKGROUNDUnnanuntana A, Laohaprasitiporn P, Jarusriwanna A. Effect of bisphosphonate initiation at week 2 versus week 12 on short-term functional recovery after femoral neck fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0321-8. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PMID: 28283937BACKGROUNDHaveman RA, van de Wall BJM, Rohner M, Beeres FJP, Haefeli PC, Baumgartner R, Babst R, Link BC. Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Jul 30;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08350-z.
PMID: 39080698DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Co-director of the orthopaedics and traumatology department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2020
First Posted
February 8, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share