Effect of Innovative Thinking Development Program on Some Approaches of Nursing Students
Effect of The Innovatıve Thınkıng Development Program on The Innovatıve Approaches, Crıtıcal Thınkıng and Perceıved Competence of Nursıng Students
1 other identifier
interventional
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: This study was conducted to determine the effect of the Innovative Thinking Development Program (ITDP) on the innovative approaches, critical thinking and perceived competence of nursing students.The study has a non-randomized, control group pre-test-post-test experimental research design. The study population consisted of senior students in the Nursing Department of two similar faculties in the academic calendar 2019-2020 (n=164). In the study, the ITDB developed by the researcher was applied to the students in the experimental group. The research data were collected online using a 'Personal Information Form', 'Individual Innovativeness Scale', 'Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale', 'Self-Efficacy Scale' and 'Success Test 'developed by the researcher. Independent samples t test, Kruskal Wallis, Wilcoxon, ANOVA tests were used in the analysis of the data. Institutional permissions and ethics committee approval was obtained for the research. Hypothesis: H0: The innovative approaches, critical thinking tendencies and competence perceptions of nursing students included in ITDP do not change. H1: Individual innovativeness, critical thinking disposition and self-efficacy scale scores of nursing students in the experimental group will change after ITDP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2021
CompletedApril 5, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 year
February 3, 2021
April 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Individual Innovativeness Scale
The scale measures individual innovativeness level. The lowest 18 points on the scale and 90 points are the highest. Based on the score obtained from the scale; 57 points and six fields 'traditionalist', 58-65 points to the areas between the 'skeptic', 66-74 score between 'questioner', 75-82 score between 'pioneer', those who scored above 82 points and 'innovative' are classified as.The increase in the scores obtained from the scale shows that the people are innovative.
3 months
Critical Thinking Trends Scale
The scale measures people's tendency to think critically. A high score taken from each sub-dimension indicates that the individual has a characteristic of the corresponding sub-dimension, and a total critical thinking trends score is obtained from the scale. The higher the score, the higher the critical thinking disposition.The highest score on the scale is 140.
3 months
Self-Efficacy Scale
This scale is used to measure people's perceptions of competence. Scores between 23 and 115 can be obtained from the scale. A high overall score on the scale indicates that people's overall perception of competence is high, and a low overall perception of competence is low.
3 months
Success Test
The test, developed in accordance with innovative thinking skills, consists of 20 questions.The highest 20 points and the lowest 0 points are taken from this test. The higher the score, the higher the innovative thinking.This test was developed to test the effectiveness of the training program on innovative thinking and to evaluate students' success on this subject. Pre-test was applied to the experimental group as post-test.
3 months
Study Arms (3)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALAfter determining the experimental and control groups, pre-tests were performed.The program was applied to students in the experimental group.The program was implemented for six weeks based on the theme of innovative thinking.The program developed a training program based on the Tyler Taba model. This model, which is often used in developing educational programs, includes all the necessary steps to teach and accept a new concept. In the ITDP training program, an interactive educational content has been created in which knowledge will be transformed into behavior.In the training, subjects were taught in units, workshops were held, seminars were given. Post-tests were applied at the end of the training.
Control Group I
NO INTERVENTIONPre-test and post-tests were applied to the non-intervention group
Control Group II
NO INTERVENTIONPre-test and post-tests were applied to the non-intervention group
Interventions
With the implementation of the program, nursing students are expected to develop innovative thinking skills.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteering to participate in the study,
- Being open to communication,
- Being a fourth year nursing student,
- Not to be an innovation and entrepreneurship course in the curriculum,
- Students have online access opportunities.
You may not qualify if:
- Not being willing to participate in the study,
- Not being open to communication,
- Not being a fourth year nursing student,
- To come by undergraduate transfer and to have taken innovation and entrepreneurship course at the faculty he came from,
- Students do not have online access facilities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Samsun, Atakum, 55200, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
İlknur Aydın Avcı, Prof
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2021
First Posted
February 8, 2021
Study Start
December 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 15, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research. However, authors on the subject can be reached.