Loading search results
Fracture_Trans
Transverse Fractures +/- Posterior Wall of the Acetabulum: Predictors of the Quality of Surgical Reduction and Long-term Outcome
Sponsor study identifier
observational
89
1 country
1
Study Start
February 3, 2021
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
March 3, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 11, 2023
Actual (reported)Acetabulum fractures are complex, relatively rare lesions linked to a more or less good functional prognosis and therefore represent a real surgical challenge. In the literature, it is accepted that surgical delay, among other things, negatively impacts the quality of surgical reduction. However, this reduction must be a major priority since it is one of the factors conditioning the functional result. In our study, we wish to analyze a particular type of fracture, less studied, or with small series, that are the transverse fractures (+/- posterior wall), known for their difficulty of reduction. The reduction is even greater as the fracture line often passes through the acetabular bearing zone, compromising the functional prognosis. The choice of surgical approach for this type of fracture is controversial. More and more, a single approach, usually posterior, without compulsory fixation of the anterior component of the transverse fracture is preferred over the traditional double approach anterior and posterior, and this in particular to reduce the morbidity of this surgery. But this one-size-fits-all approach does not always achieve a good reduction and it is believed that the time to surgery may play a role. If it is accepted that the surgical delay before reduction in osteosynthesis of an acetabular fracture is involved in the quality of the reduction and therefore the functional result in these patients, the question asked is whether this delay should condition the choice of a double approach, anterior and posterior, for this type of fracture (transverse +/- posterior wall). Indeed, with increasing surgical time, the risk of scar tissue formation and early callus increases, making bone fragments less mobile, reduction more difficult and indirect reduction techniques (which are used when single approach is chosen) less efficient. In addition, most of the studies evaluating the quality of reduction of acetabular fractures use a radiographic score, that of Matta. However, it has been shown that the CT scan was more efficient than the x-rays in detecting a residual displacement of the fracture. Also, in this study, we want to analyze the quality of reduction thanks to the scanner, which is rarely done in the literature. This work aims to determine the predictive factors of the quality of reduction of transverse fractures +/- posterior wall of the acetabulum, evaluated on the postoperative CT scan.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 11, 2023
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 3, 2021
Actual (reported)February 3, 2021
Actual (reported)February 5, 2021
Actual (reported)March 3, 2021
Actual (reported)September 11, 2023
Actual (reported)Fracture reduction quality
This outcome corresponds to the fracture reduction quality assessed on the postoperative CT scan using the Saint Joseph score.
Year 1
Complication rate
Year 1
Patients were treated for transverse fractures +/- posterior wall of the acetabulum within the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group, between 2006 and 2020.
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45.
Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, Barlow N, Deo S, Worlock P, Willett K. Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum. The time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Sep;88(9):1197-203. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17588.
Guillaume RIOUALLON, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
89 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 3, 2021
First Posted
February 5, 2021
Study Start
February 3, 2021
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Giordano V, do Amaral NP, Pallottino A, Pires e Albuquerque R, Franklin CE, Labronici PJ. Operative treatment of transverse acetabular fractures: is it really necessary to fix both columns? Int J Med Sci. 2009 Jul 12;6(4):192-9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6.192.
Verbeek DO, van der List JP, Villa JC, Wellman DS, Helfet DL. Postoperative CT Is Superior for Acetabular Fracture Reduction Assessment and Reliably Predicts Hip Survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 18;99(20):1745-1752. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01446.
Primary Completion
March 3, 2021
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 11, 2023
Actual (reported)Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-09
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: