NCT04731428

Brief Summary

This research was carried out as an pre-test/post-test control group experimental design study in order to determine the effect of progressive relaxation exercises on the level of vital sign, pain and anxiety underwent who laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients. This research data was collected between March 2018 and May 2019. The research was carried out with 63 patients (experiment group= 31, control group= 32) who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a general surgery clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul and in accordance with the research criteria. Patients in the experiment group were taught breathing exercises in the preoperative period and on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after surgery then, progressive relaxation exercise that lasted 15 minutes was applied to the group. Pain (Short McGill Pain Scale) and anxiety (STAI-S Scale) levels of both groups were evaluated in the preoperative and postoperative period. The patient's vital signs, oxygen saturation and serum cortisol level parameters were measured in the same time interval before and after the relaxation exercise. Significance was evaluated at p \<0.05 and p\<0,001 levels in the analysis of the data. Prior to the study, the consent of the institution and ethics committee, written and verbal patient consent were obtained.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2021

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 1, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

January 15, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Progressive relaxation exerciseColorectal cancer surgeryPainAnxietyNursing care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Preoperative pain severity

    Pain severity assessment with Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire In the first part, pain intensity is evaluated as 0=no pain, 1=mild pain, 2=moderate pain, 3=severe pain In the second part, the pain felt is evalauted using the Visuel Analog Scale (VAS).0-10; 0- No Pain, 10- Worst pain In the third part, the total pain intensity is measured with a 6-point Likert-type assessment. (0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=annoying , 3=troublesome, 4=miserable, 5=unbearable pain) Pain assessment for the experimental group Preoperative pain assessment of the experimental group was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise. This evaluation was made 2 hours before surgery (6.30 am). Pain assessment for the control group Preoperative pain assessment of the control group was made 2 hours before the operation in order to ensure the equivalence between the groups (6.30 am).

    Preoperative pain assessment of the groups was made 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative anxiety severity

    Anxiety severity with Spielberger's State and Trait Anxiety Inventory State Anxiety Subscale are specified by choosing one of the options "1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so" according to the severity of such experiences. Anxiety assessment for the experimental group Preoperative anxiety assessment of the experimental group was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise. This evaluation was made 2 hours before surgery (6.30 am). Anxiety assessment for the control group Preoperative anxiety assessment of the control group was made 2 hours before the operation in order to ensure the equivalence between the groups (6.30 am).

    Preoperative anxiety assessment of the groups was made 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (1st. assessment)

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made with a digital blood pressure measuring device. For experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise(6.30 am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.30am.

    In the preoperative period, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative pulse rate (heart rate per minute) (1st. assessment)

    Pulse rate (heart rate per minute) evaluation was made with a digital pulse-meter. For the experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise (6.30 am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.30am.

    In the preoperative period, the pulse rate was evaluated 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative respiratory rate (respiratory per minute) (1st. assessment)

    Respiratory rate (respiratory per minute) evaluation was made by the researcher by counting 1 minute. For the experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise (6.30am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.30am.

    In the preoperative period, respiratory rate was evaluated 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative body temperature (Celcius) (1st. assessment)

    Body temperature (Celcius)assessment was made with a digital thermometer. For the experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise (6.30am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.30am.

    In the preoperative period, body temperature was evaluated 2 hours before surgery

  • Preoperative oxygen saturation (SpO2) (1st. assessment)

    Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was evaluated with a pulse oximeter. For the experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise (6.30am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.30am.

    In the preoperative period, oxygen saturation was evaluated 2 hours before surgery.

  • Preoperative serum cortisol levels (1st. assessment)

    Blood samples were placed in tubes containing separator gel (SST-yellow tube) and serum cortisol level was analyzed in the relevant laboratory. For the experimental group The first evaluation was made before applying the progressive relaxation exercise (6.45 am). For the control group The first evaluation was made 6.45am.

    In the preoperative period, serum cortisol levels assessment of the groups was made 2 hours before surgery.

  • Use of analgesic (See Table 1)(in the first 24 hours after surgery)

    In this section, dose (mg) of use of analgesics were followed. Table 1: Monitoring of analgesic use of patients Analgesic name Dose (mg) Postoperative 0 Opioid NSAİ Other

    Analgesic consumption of the patients was recorded in the first 24 hours after surgery.

  • Preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (2nd. assessment)

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made with a digital blood pressure measuring device. For experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 5 minutes after the application (7.20am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 7.20am.

    In the preoperative period, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made 1 hour before surgery.

  • Preoperative pulse rate (heart rate per minute) (2nd. assessment)

    Respiratory rate (respiratory per minute) evaluation was made by the researcher by counting 1 minute. For the experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 5 minutes after the application (7.20am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 7.20am.

    In the preoperative period, the pulse rate was evaluated 1 hour before surgery.

  • Preoperative respiratory rate (respiratory per minute) (2nd. assessment)

    Respiratory rate (respiratory per minute) evaluation was made by the researcher by counting 1 minute. For the experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 5 minutes after the application (7.20am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 7.20am.

    In the preoperative period, respiratory rate was evaluated 1 hour before surgery.

  • Preoperative body temperature (Celcius) (2nd. assessment)

    Body temperature (Celcius)assessment was made with a digital thermometer. For the experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 5 minutes after the application (7.20am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 7.20am.

    In the preoperative period, body temperature was evaluated 1 hour before surgery.

  • Preoperative oxygen saturation (SpO2) (2nd. assessment)

    Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was evaluated with a pulse oximeter. For the experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 5 minutes after the application (7.20am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 7.20am.

    In the preoperative period, oxygen saturation was evaluated 1 hour before surgery.

  • Preoperative serum cortisol levels (2nd. assessment)

    Blood samples were placed in tubes containing separator gel (SST-yellow tube) and serum cortisol level was analyzed in the relevant laboratory. For the experimental group Progressive relaxation exercise was applied, the second evaluation was made 45 minutes after the application (8.00am.). For the control group Progressive relaxation exercise wasn't applied because of was control group, the second evaluation was made 8.00am.

    In the preoperative period, serum cortisol levels assessment of the groups was made 1 hour before surgery.

  • Use of analgesic (See Table 1)(postoperative 1st. day)

    In this section, dose of use of analgesics were followed. Table 1: Monitoring of analgesic use of patients Analgesic name Doses (mg) Postoperative 1 Opioid NSAİ Other

    Analgesic consumption of the patients was recorded in the postoperative 1st. day.

  • Use of analgesic (See Table 1)(postoperative 2nd day)

    In this section, dose of use of analgesics were followed. Table 1: Monitoring of analgesic use of patients Analgesic name Dose (mg) Postoperative 2 Opioid NSAİ Other

    Analgesic consumption of the patients was recorded in the postoperative 2nd. day.

  • Use of analgesic (See Table 1)(postoperative 3rd day)

    In this section, dose of use of analgesics were followed. Table 1: Monitoring of analgesic use of patients Analgesic name Dose (mg) Postoperative 3 Opioid NSAİ Other

    Analgesic consumption of the patients was recorded in the postoperative 3rd. days.

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Postoperative pain severity

    Postoperative pain assessment of the groups was made postoperative 3rd. day.

  • Postoperative anxiety severity

    Postoperative anxiety assessment of the groups was made postoperative 3rd. day.

  • Postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (1st. assessment)

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made on postoperative 1st. day.

  • Postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (2nd. assessment)

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made on postoperative 2nd. day.

  • Postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (3rd. assessment)

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) evaluations were made on postoperative 3rd. day.

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Progressive Relaxation Exercise

EXPERIMENTAL

In individuals with normal daily circadian rhythms, cortisol levels peak at 8:00 AM, followed by a constantly declining daily cycle throughout the day. Therefore, it is important to collect blood samples taken for the measurement of serum cortisol levels approximately at the same time. Venous blood samples (3 ml) were obtained from the upper arm at 06:45 AM to evaluate the baseline and 45 minutes after Progressive Relaxation Exercise at 08:00. Vital signs and oxygen saturation were assessed at 6:30 AM before Progressive Relaxation Exercise and at 07:20 AM 5 minutes after Progressive Relaxation Exercise. Measurements were performed in the morning on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.

Behavioral: Progressive Relaxation Exercise

Standard Care

NO INTERVENTION

In the control group, no application made during and after the surgical intervention, and routine treatment and care applied.

Interventions

Progressive Relaxation Exercise involves stretching sixteen muscle groups while breathing in sequentially, relaxing while exhaling. Exercise can be from head to toe or from foot to head. In order for the technique to be effective, it is important to have affective (music, etc.) and visual aids. During the exercise, the patient should complete the processes of perceiving the tension in his body, maintaining control and getting into a state of relaxation. After the patient is informed about the exercise, the person starts with breathing exercises. A deep but relaxing breath is taken from the nose, and lips are given by contracting simultaneously with relaxation. During this application, the patient keeps contracting the muscle group that he exercises for 10 seconds; the nurse provides the patient to notice the temperature / warming felt in the muscle group.

Progressive Relaxation Exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being 18 years or over,
  • Consenting to participate in the study with verbal and written declaration after being informed,
  • Being scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery,
  • Not participating in another randomized controlled study simultaneously.

You may not qualify if:

  • Having a health problem that will alter cortisol release,
  • Preoperative and postoperative unconsciousness,
  • Having a psychiatric problem,
  • Having a disease that requires corticosteroid therapy,
  • Developing any complications during the operation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul University-Istanbul Medical Faculty Hospital

Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ozhanli Y, Akyuz N. The Effect of Progressive Relaxation Exercise on Physiological Parameters, Pain and Anxiety Levels of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Perianesth Nurs. 2022 Apr;37(2):238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAnxiety DisordersPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Nuray Akyüz, Assoc. Prof.

    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Yasemin Özhanlı, PhD

    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Controlled Study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2021

First Posted

February 1, 2021

Study Start

March 15, 2018

Primary Completion

May 30, 2019

Study Completion

June 10, 2020

Last Updated

February 1, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations