VieScope Versus Direct Laryngoscopic Intubation
VieScOP
Endotracheal Intubation With VieScope Versus Direct Laryngoscopic Intubation in Patients for Elective Surgery - a Prospective Randomized Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgery without expected difficult airway are randomized to be intubated either by a) VieScope or b) conventional direct laryngoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedApril 8, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 month
January 23, 2021
April 7, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First attempt success rate
percentage of successful intubations with one attempt
15 min
Secondary Outcomes (11)
intubating conditions
15 min
overall success rate
15 min
time to successful intubation
15 min
time to successful intubation with one attempt
15 min
intubation difficulty
15 min
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VieScope
EXPERIMENTALintubation with the VieScope laryngoscope
Conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORintubation with MacIntosh-type laryngoscope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients requiring general anesthesia with transoral tracheal intubation for elective surgery
- Age ≥ 18
- Preoperative airway assessment reveals an expected non-difficult airway (rated by the responsible anesthetist in the Pre-assessment Clinic based on the existing in-house algorithm)
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Confirmed indications for awake fiberoptic intubation especially due to enoral, pharyngeal tumors, abscesses or other processes
- Planned endotracheal intubation without deep anesthesia or neuromuscular blocking agents (e.g. awake videolaryngoscopy)
- Required transnasal tracheal intubation (e.g. for surgical reasons)
- Requirement of special endotracheal tubes such as laser or RAE tubes for surgical reasons
- Patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration who qualify for rapid sequence induction
- Loose teeth
- Denial of consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Joern Grensemann, MD
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- STUDY CHAIR
Martin Petzoldt, MD
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- device for intubation may not be blinded for provider or investigator
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2021
First Posted
January 26, 2021
Study Start
January 26, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04