NCT04723420

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing displacement of macula and the rapidity of reattachment of macula between two different positioning techniques after pneumatic retinopexy : Direct technique (patient is positioned so that the bubble is immediately placed directly over the retina break) and Steamroller technique (patient is initially positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently changes their head position so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 7, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2021

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 7, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Pneumatic RetinopexySteamrollDirect to break

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Macular status at Day 1

    Assessment of macular status by optical coherence tomography at 24 hours after intervention to see which technique is most effective for reattaching the macula

    24hours post intervention

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Anatomical displacement of macula and its changes with time.

    1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention

  • Functional displacement of macula and its changes with time.

    1,2, 3 and 6 months post intervention

  • Macular Status

    1hour, 2hours, Day 2, Week 1, Week 2

  • Visual acuity

    1, 3 and 6 months post intervention

  • Primary anatomical success

    1, 3 and 6 months post intervention

Study Arms (2)

Steamroller Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following intravitreal gas injection, patient positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently patient changes the position of the head so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break.

Other: Steamroller technique

Direct Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following intravitreal gas injection, patient is immediately positioned so that the bubble is placed directly over the retina break.

Other: Direct technique

Interventions

Following intravitreal gas injection, patient positioned face down for 4-6 hours and subsequently patient changes the position of the head so that the bubble is then placed directly over the retina break.

Steamroller Technique

Following intravitreal gas injection, patient is immediately positioned so that the bubble is placed directly over the retina break.

Direct Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary RRD
  • Causative breaks over superior 8 clock hours
  • Single break or group of breaks
  • No or min proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (Grade A or B)
  • Other breaks or lattice in attached retina are allowed

You may not qualify if:

  • Retinal break in the inferior 4 clock hours in detached retina
  • PVR Grade C or worse
  • Significant media opacity (Vitreous hemorrhage, dense cataract, cornea scar, etc)
  • Pre-existing ocular pathology \[macula hole (MH), epiretinal membrane (ERM), cystoid macula edema (CME), age-related macula degeneration, myopic degeneration, advanced glaucoma, uveitis, amblyopia etc\] or previous eye trauma with poor baseline vision
  • Previous pars plana vitrectomy
  • Age ≤18years old
  • Inadequate physical or mental competence to maintain the required postoperative head position

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fluorescent Antibody TechniqueImmunohistochemistryHistocytochemistryCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHistological TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesImmunologic Techniques

Study Officials

  • Kenneth Eng, MD FRCSC

    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Coordinator

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pneumatic Retinopexy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: To Steamroll or Not

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2020

First Posted

January 25, 2021

Study Start

August 7, 2020

Primary Completion

December 7, 2023

Study Completion

December 7, 2023

Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations