Place-based Mapping in EAS Listeners
Place-based Mapping in Electric-acoustic Stimulation Listeners
2 other identifiers
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: Investigate monaural and binaural hearing in electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users with place-based versus default maps. Participants: Cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing listeners Procedures (methods): This is a prospective, longitudinal investigation of the monaural and binaural outcomes (such as speech perception, spatial hearing, and/or subjective benefit) of cochlear implant recipients listening with different programs. The programs will incorporate different patient and device variables to determine the effect on cochlear implant recipient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 7, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 18, 2025
CompletedMay 18, 2025
July 1, 2024
3.4 years
January 19, 2021
February 26, 2025
May 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Monaural Perception for Participants With Cochlear Implants (Arms 1 and 2) Over Time
Monaural perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., activation, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).
Up to 12 months post-activation
Binaural Hearing Abilities Over Time (Noise to the Study Ear Minus Noise From the Front)
Binaural hearing abilities (e.g., spatial release from masking) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).
Up to 12 months post-activation
Binaural Hearing Abilities Over Time (Noise to the Non-study Ear Minus Noise From the Front)
Binaural hearing abilities (e.g., spatial release from masking) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).
Up to 12 months post-activation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Abilities Over Time
Up to 12 months post-activation
Other Outcomes (3)
Word Recognition With Default Versus Place-based Maps for Participants With Normal Hearing
All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).
Vowel Recognition for Participants With Normal Hearing
All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).
Sentence Understanding in Noise for Participants With Normal Hearing
All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).
Study Arms (3)
Cochlear implant participants with Default maps
OTHERThe default frequency filters assigned by the clinical software
Cochlear implant participants with Place-Based maps
EXPERIMENTALFrequency filters adjusted to align with the cochlear place frequency
Normal hearing controls listening to simulations
OTHERNormal hearing controls listening to simulations of default and place-based maps.
Interventions
Adjusting the electric frequency filters to align with the cochlear place frequency
Default frequency filter assignments
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age at implantation, identify English as native language, Medical Electronics (MED-EL) array recipient, and a postoperative unaided detection threshold of less than or equal to 65 decibel (dB) hearing level (HL) at 125 Hz
You may not qualify if:
- Report or present with a cognitive delay or impairment
- Normal-hearing controls
- years of age at time of testing, unaided detection thresholds of 35 dB HL or better from 500-4000 Hz, identify English as native language
- Report or present with a cognitive delay or impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC ENT at Carolina Crossing
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Related Publications (3)
Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Rooth MA, Richter ME, Overton AB, Roth NE, Dillon SM, Raymond JH, Young A, Pearson AC, Davis AG, Dedmon MM, Brown KD, O'Connell BP. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users. Am J Audiol. 2023 Mar;32(1):251-260. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00254. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
PMID: 36800505RESULTDillon MT, O'Connell BP, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):322-337. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00123. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
PMID: 35394798RESULTDillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J, O'Connell BP. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jan;42(1):197-202. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002965.
PMID: 33885267RESULT
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Margaret Dillon, AuD, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Margaret T Dillon, AuD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin D Brown, MD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participant and testing audiologist were blinded to the randomized map for Arm 1 (cochlear implant users with default maps) and Arm 2 (cochlear implant users with place-based maps). Arm 3 is normal hearing participants listening to simulations of default and place-based maps.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2021
First Posted
January 25, 2021
Study Start
February 23, 2021
Primary Completion
July 7, 2024
Study Completion
July 7, 2024
Last Updated
May 18, 2025
Results First Posted
May 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- beginning 9 to 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.