NCT04722042

Brief Summary

Purpose: Investigate monaural and binaural hearing in electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users with place-based versus default maps. Participants: Cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing listeners Procedures (methods): This is a prospective, longitudinal investigation of the monaural and binaural outcomes (such as speech perception, spatial hearing, and/or subjective benefit) of cochlear implant recipients listening with different programs. The programs will incorporate different patient and device variables to determine the effect on cochlear implant recipient outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 23, 2021

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 7, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 7, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

January 19, 2021

Results QC Date

February 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Monaural Perception for Participants With Cochlear Implants (Arms 1 and 2) Over Time

    Monaural perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., activation, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).

    Up to 12 months post-activation

  • Binaural Hearing Abilities Over Time (Noise to the Study Ear Minus Noise From the Front)

    Binaural hearing abilities (e.g., spatial release from masking) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).

    Up to 12 months post-activation

  • Binaural Hearing Abilities Over Time (Noise to the Non-study Ear Minus Noise From the Front)

    Binaural hearing abilities (e.g., spatial release from masking) will be assessed at defined intervals (e.g., 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation). Performance (e.g., percent correct) will be compared within-subject and between group over the study intervals. This procedure is specific to Arm 1 (participants with default maps) and Arm 2 (participants with place-based maps).

    Up to 12 months post-activation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Perceived Abilities Over Time

    Up to 12 months post-activation

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Word Recognition With Default Versus Place-based Maps for Participants With Normal Hearing

    All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).

  • Vowel Recognition for Participants With Normal Hearing

    All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).

  • Sentence Understanding in Noise for Participants With Normal Hearing

    All procedures completed at baseline (one visit that was ~ 20 minutes in duration).

Study Arms (3)

Cochlear implant participants with Default maps

OTHER

The default frequency filters assigned by the clinical software

Other: default mapping

Cochlear implant participants with Place-Based maps

EXPERIMENTAL

Frequency filters adjusted to align with the cochlear place frequency

Other: place-based mapping

Normal hearing controls listening to simulations

OTHER

Normal hearing controls listening to simulations of default and place-based maps.

Other: place-based mappingOther: default mapping

Interventions

Adjusting the electric frequency filters to align with the cochlear place frequency

Cochlear implant participants with Place-Based mapsNormal hearing controls listening to simulations

Default frequency filter assignments

Cochlear implant participants with Default mapsNormal hearing controls listening to simulations

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age at implantation, identify English as native language, Medical Electronics (MED-EL) array recipient, and a postoperative unaided detection threshold of less than or equal to 65 decibel (dB) hearing level (HL) at 125 Hz

You may not qualify if:

  • Report or present with a cognitive delay or impairment
  • Normal-hearing controls
  • years of age at time of testing, unaided detection thresholds of 35 dB HL or better from 500-4000 Hz, identify English as native language
  • Report or present with a cognitive delay or impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UNC ENT at Carolina Crossing

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Rooth MA, Richter ME, Overton AB, Roth NE, Dillon SM, Raymond JH, Young A, Pearson AC, Davis AG, Dedmon MM, Brown KD, O'Connell BP. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users. Am J Audiol. 2023 Mar;32(1):251-260. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00254. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

  • Dillon MT, O'Connell BP, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):322-337. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00123. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

  • Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, Hopfinger J, O'Connell BP. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jan;42(1):197-202. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002965.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Margaret Dillon, AuD, PhD
Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Study Officials

  • Margaret T Dillon, AuD, PhD

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kevin D Brown, MD, PhD

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participant and testing audiologist were blinded to the randomized map for Arm 1 (cochlear implant users with default maps) and Arm 2 (cochlear implant users with place-based maps). Arm 3 is normal hearing participants listening to simulations of default and place-based maps.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Subjects will be randomized to one of two groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2021

First Posted

January 25, 2021

Study Start

February 23, 2021

Primary Completion

July 7, 2024

Study Completion

July 7, 2024

Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Results First Posted

May 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Time Frame
beginning 9 to 36 months following publication
Access Criteria
Investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Locations