The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Placebo groups in clinical trials on depression show impressive improvements. Yet, there is little research on the mechanism underlying this effect. The aim of this study is to assess how patients' treatment expectations modulate the placebo treatment effects. We expect that patients' treatment expectation determines placebo responses and treatment outcomes, and that this expectation is influenced by the disorder explanations (information about the illness models) typically provided during the initial medical encounters that precede treatment. In the study we aim to manipulate depressed patients' expectations by providing two different clinician-delivered illness and treatment rationales (biological/ psychological). Patients will then receive placebo treatment (pharmacological/ psychological), that is either congruent or incongruent with the previously communicated treatment rationale. Hypotheses:
- 1.Providing a treatment-congruent treatment rationale leads to a better outcome than providing treatment-incongruent rationales.
- 2.Treatment-congruent explanations reduce the risk of side effect development, in particular in the medication arm.
- 3.Inter-individual differences in the effect of provided treatment rationale are associated with pre-treatment experiences and expectations, depression severity and comorbid anxiety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2023
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
2.4 years
January 6, 2021
November 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in depression severity scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale' (MADRS)
Expert rating to assess depression severity; 10 items; each item is rated on a 7-point scale (0-6); total scores range between 0-60 (higher scores indicate more severe depression)
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in depressive symptom scores after 4 weeks of treatment- 'Beck Depression Inventory' (BDI-II)
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Change in subjective disability scores after 4 weeks of treatment - adaptation of 'Pain Disability Index' (PDI)
Pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Change in 'Generic Assessment of Side-Effects' scores (GASE) after 4 weeks of treatment
Pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Change in treatment expectations at the start of treatment - 'Treatment Expectation Questionnaire' (TEX-Q)
Baseline, pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline)
Change in subjective stress scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Perceived Stress Scale' (PSS-10)
pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (10)
Treatment adherence
Once per week (during the 4-week treatment period)
Common biological stress markers
Baseline
Current treatment effects after 4 weeks of treatment
post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment)
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (5)
1. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Pharmacol.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).
2. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Pharmacol.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).
3. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Psychol.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).
4. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Psychol.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).
5. Natural course control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants receive no intervention and remain on the psychotherapy waiting list. Participants who are recruited externally and are not on a waiting list, will be offered the option to join the waiting list.
Interventions
Depression is described as a brain disorder and the role of monoamine, brain structures, and brain functions are reported as central mechanisms of relevance for its etiology and treatment. Biological processes are illustrated using typical charts and visualizations. Psychological influences are mentioned, but only as a byproduct of the disorder.
Depression is described as a psychological disorder resulting from emotion regulation deficits. The suppression of emotions receives a special role in explaining depression. The psychological processes are illustrated using charts and visualizations. Biological aspects are mentioned, but only as a byproduct of the disorder.
The active placebo pill does not have direct effects on the brain. Buscopan (butylscopolamine, 10 mg daily, 1 pill in the morning) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, yet induces some smaller side effects that resemble those of antidepressants (e.g., mouth dryness, fatigue, nausea). Treatment duration is 4 weeks. The rationale is briefly explained to participants as "stimulating the biological balance in humans with depression, using a well-tolerated drug similar to Buscopan, which is well-known from pain treatments.
"Emotional writing" consists of writing about emotional experiences (4 sessions, one per week, 30 minutes each). The study instructor will be present displaying standard psychotherapeutic attitudes but will not read the participant's notes. The rationale for this treatment is briefly explained as "improving the dealing" with emotions to achieve a psychological balance in humans with depression.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of major depression according to the 'Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V' (SCID)
- Age\>17
- Comorbidity is allowed if major depression is the dominant clinical problem
- Concordant medication is allowed if kept constant for the four weeks before and until the end of the trial (with the exception of benzodiazepines and if not contraindicated together with Buscopan)
- Fluency in German
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe depression (BDI\> 30) or suicidality
- Psychosis
- Significant neurological diseases
- Other mental or physical disorder with substantial influence on disability
- Benzodiazepine intake
- Any intolerance against Buscopan and sucrose or any medical condition/treatment conflicting with Buscopan intake
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Philipps University Marburglead
- Psychotherapie-Ambulanz Marburg e.V.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg
Marburg, 35032, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Henrich L, Wilhelm M, Lange P, Rief W. The role of the communicated treatment rationale on treatment outcome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07557-w.
PMID: 37592320DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Winfried Rief
Philipps University Marburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be blinded to the congruency condition. Outcome assessors (diagnosticians) will be blinded to treatment allocation and the congruency condition (both at the pre-measurement and at the post-measurement). The clinicians (care providers) who deliver the illness explanation and treatment rationale will be blinded to the participants' treatment allocation up to the point at which the respective treatment is delivered. This means that the clinician provides the treatment rationale (biological / psychological) without knowledge of whether a congruent or incongruent treatment will be delivered afterwards. The staff members who deliver the treatment (care providers) will be different to the clinician who delivers the rationales. Thus the treatment will be delivered without knowledge of whether a congruent or incongruent illness explanation was given.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2021
First Posted
January 22, 2021
Study Start
April 13, 2021
Primary Completion
September 12, 2023
Study Completion
September 12, 2023
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11