PErsonalized Addition of Recombinant LH in Ovarian Stimulation
PEARL
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Different ovarian stimulation regimens have shown to modify late follicular phase hormonal profiles. Besides, recent studies confirm that progesterone levels and their variation in the last day of oocyte maturation are affected by the dose of gonadotropins administered and by other factors. Progesterone elevation in late follicular phase of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles under ovarian stimulation compromises implantation rates due to a negative effect on the endometrium. However, there is still conflict in the literature questioning whether progesterone levels alone on the triggering day is a sufficient indicator as progesterone does not give the full picture of the ovarian functions, number of follicles as well as estrogen production that facilitate endometrial growth, thus some studies suggest that especially in aged and poor responders Progesterone/Estrogen (P4/E2) ratio has a better reflection (Progesterone (ng/mL) ×1,000/estradiol(pg/mL)) on the ovarian function. The scope of the current pilot study is to compare serum progesterone levels as well as P4/E2 ratio on the day of ovulation triggering of women belonging to POSEIDON category group 2 who undergo a new ovarian stimulation with a dose of rhFSH 300 IU or 300 IU rhFSH plus 150 IU recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2027
March 30, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.5 years
January 14, 2021
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Serum progesterone levels on the day of ovulation triggering.
The outcome will be evaluated on the day of ovulation triggering
5 -20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation
P/E2 ratio
Progesterone / estradiol ratio
5 -20 days from initiation of ovarian stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Progesterone Profile
days 1, 6, 8, 10 and the day of ovulation triggering
Estradiol Profile
days 1, 6, 8, 10 and the day of ovulation triggering
FSH Profile
days 1, 6, 8, 10 and the day of ovulation triggering
Testosterone Profile
days 1, 6, 8, 10 and the day of ovulation triggering
LH Profile
days 1, 6, 8, 10 and the day of ovulation triggering
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (percent).
Until 15 days after the end of ovarian stimulation
Miscarriages
before completion of 12 weeks of gestation
Cycle cancelation
Until 15 days after the beginning of ovarian stimulation
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
rhFSH+rhLH
EXPERIMENTALOvarian Stimulation with rhFSH+rhLH
rhFSH
ACTIVE COMPARATOROvarian Stimulation with rhFSH
Interventions
300 IU of rhFSH and 150 IU of rhLH (Pergoveris®) GnRH antagonist: cetrorelix 0.25 mg (Cetrotide® - Merck) GnRH antagonist: cetrorelix 0.25 mg (Cetrotide® - Merck) Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) 6500 IU (Ovitrelle® - Merck) micronized progesterone 90 mg (Crinone 8% ® - Merck)
300 IU rhFSH (Gonal-F®- Merck) GnRH antagonist: cetrorelix 0.25 mg (Cetrotide® - Merck) GnRH antagonist: cetrorelix 0.25 mg (Cetrotide® - Merck) rhCG 6500 IU (Ovitrelle® - Merck) micronized progesterone 90 mg (Crinone 8% ® - Merck)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able and willing to sign the Patient Consent Form and adhere to study visitation schedule.
- ≥ 35 years ≤40 years old.
- AFC ≥5 and or AMH ≥1.2 ng/mL.
- \<4 or 4-9 oocytes retrieved in a previous IVF/ICSI cycle with a starting dose of ≤225 IU with any gonadotropin under a GnRH antagonist protocol.
- Up to 3 previous ovarian stimulation cycles with a starting dose of ≤225 IU in which dose adjustments during stimulation did not exceed 300 IU.
- Ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
You may not qualify if:
- Poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients according to the Rotterdam criteria.
- AFC\>20.
- Age \>40 or \<35 years old.
- Women with \>10 oocytes retrieved in a previous IVF/ICSI cycle with 150-225 IU starting dose.
- Women who required dose adjustments during stimulation \>300 IU with any gonadotropin in their previous cycle
- Uterine abnormalities.
- Recent history of any current untreated endocrine abnormality.
- Unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx (visible on ultrasound scan (USS), unless clipped).
- Contraindications for the use of medicine used for ovarian stimulation (gonadotropins, GnRH antagonist, progesterone vaginal gel)
- Recent history of severe disease requiring regular treatment (Clinically significant concurrent medical condition that could compromise subject safety or interfered with the trial assessment and patients with any contraindication to pregnancy).
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-a).
- Testicular Sperm Aspiration or Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESA or TESE)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundación Santiago Dexeus Fontlead
- Merck, S.L., Spaincollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
Barcelona, 08028, Spain
Related Publications (26)
Esteves SC, Khastgir G, Shah J, Murdia K, Gupta SM, Rao DG, Dash S, Ingale K, Patil M, Moideen K, Thakor P, Dewda P. Association Between Progesterone Elevation on the Day of Human Chronic Gonadotropin Trigger and Pregnancy Outcomes After Fresh Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Apr 26;9:201. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00201. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29755412BACKGROUNDFatemi HM, Van Vaerenbergh I. Significance of premature progesterone rise in IVF. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;27(3):242-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000172.
PMID: 25811257BACKGROUNDHuang Y, Wang EY, Du QY, Xiong YJ, Guo XY, Yu YP, Sun YP. Progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration adversely affects the outcome of IVF with transferred embryos at different developmental stages. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Aug 4;13:82. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0075-3.
PMID: 26238449BACKGROUNDJoo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS. Serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentration-dependent manner. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.066. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
PMID: 19394001BACKGROUNDLawrenz B, Fatemi HM. Effect of progesterone elevation in follicular phase of IVF-cycles on the endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Apr;34(4):422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
PMID: 28162937BACKGROUNDMitwally MF, Bhakoo HS, Crickard K, Sullivan MW, Batt RE, Yeh J. Estradiol production during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation correlates with treatment outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2006 Sep;86(3):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.086. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
PMID: 16814289BACKGROUNDValbuena D, Martin J, de Pablo JL, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril. 2001 Nov;76(5):962-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02018-0.
PMID: 11704118BACKGROUNDRacca A, De Munck N, Santos-Ribeiro S, Drakopoulos P, Errazuriz J, Galvao A, Popovic-Todorovic B, Mackens S, De Vos M, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Blockeel C. Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):167-174. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez238.
PMID: 31953546BACKGROUNDYounis JS. The role of progesterone/estradiol ratio in exploring the mechanism of late follicular progesterone elevation in low ovarian reserve women. Med Hypotheses. 2019 Apr;125:126-128. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PMID: 30902140BACKGROUNDLin YJ, Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin PY, Chiang HJ, Kung FT. Reproducibility and clinical significance of pre-ovulatory serum progesterone level and progesterone/estradiol ratio on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration in infertile women undergoing repeated in vitro fertilization cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 May 13;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0037-9.
PMID: 25967104BACKGROUNDGrynberg M, Labrosse J. Understanding Follicular Output Rate (FORT) and its Implications for POSEIDON Criteria. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 16;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00246. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31040828BACKGROUNDPolyzos NP, Nwoye M, Corona R, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Haentjens P, Camus M, Tournaye H. Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
PMID: 24581984BACKGROUNDPolyzos NP, Sunkara SK. Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group? Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2005-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev149. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
PMID: 26202582BACKGROUNDSunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10.
PMID: 21558332BACKGROUNDPoseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 26921622BACKGROUNDHumaidan P, Alviggi C, Fischer R, Esteves SC. The novel POSEIDON stratification of 'Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology' and its proposed marker of successful outcome. F1000Res. 2016 Dec 23;5:2911. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10382.1. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28232864BACKGROUNDAndersen AN, Devroey P, Arce JC. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3217-27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del284. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
PMID: 16873892BACKGROUNDSmitz J, Andersen AN, Devroey P, Arce JC; MERIT Group. Endocrine profile in serum and follicular fluid differs after ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2007 Mar;22(3):676-87. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del445. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
PMID: 17110397BACKGROUNDVuong TN, Phung HT, Ho MT. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged >/=35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev038. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
PMID: 25740882BACKGROUNDAl-Azemi M, Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Humaidan P, Van Vaerenbergh I, Devroey P, Fatemi HM. Elevated progesterone during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Apr;24(4):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
PMID: 22377153BACKGROUNDBungum L, Franssohn F, Bungum M, Humaidan P, Giwercman A. The circadian variation in Anti-Mullerian hormone in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome differs significantly from normally ovulating women. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e68223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068223. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24023708BACKGROUNDGonzalez-Foruria I, Rodriguez I, Martinez F, Rodriguez-Purata J, Montoya P, Rodriguez D, Nicolau J, Coroleu B, Barri PN, Polyzos NP. Clinically significant intra-day variability of serum progesterone levels during the final day of oocyte maturation: a prospective study with repeated measurements. Hum Reprod. 2019 Aug 1;34(8):1551-1558. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez091.
PMID: 31334546BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Mannaerts B, Andersen CY, Witjes H, Kolibianakis EM, Gordon K. Progesterone elevation does not compromise pregnancy rates in high responders: a pooled analysis of in vitro fertilization patients treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone/gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in six trials. Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1622-8.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.045. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
PMID: 24083873BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis B, Kolibianakis EM. To pill or not to pill in GnRH-antagonist cycles: the answer is in the data already! Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jul;31(1):6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PMID: 25985996BACKGROUNDGolan A, Weissman A. Symposium: Update on prediction and management of OHSS. A modern classification of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60042-9.
PMID: 19573287BACKGROUNDBosch E, Vidal C, Labarta E, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists--a randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2008 Oct;23(10):2346-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den220. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
PMID: 18583332BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nikolaos P Polyzos, MD PhD
Hospital Universitari Dexeus
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2021
First Posted
January 22, 2021
Study Start
February 4, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share