A Randomized Controlled Study of Different Trigger Modes of Antagonist Regimen in Patients With Low Ovarian Reserve
1 other identifier
interventional
310
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Assisted reproductive technology (ART), especially controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), significantly increased clinical pregnancy rates among infertile patients. However, about 9% to 24% of patients had poor ovarian response to gonadotropins (GNS) stimulation, which was called poor ovarian response (POR). In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of patients with low fertility is the challenge for reproductive medicine. To better demonstrate the effectiveness of various interventions and distinguish the different subgroups of patients, 2016 POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) standard changed low reaction into low prognosis of patient-oriented individual strategies to obtain eggs. For patients in group 3 and group 4 classified by POSEIDON, ovarian reserve function decline, follicular development desynchrony and low numbers of oocytes obtained lead to poor prognosis. In 2020, the prognosis based on Delphi method of assisted reproductive technology to treat low crowd diagnosis expert opinion in China recommended to give these patients conventional cosine solutions such as antagonist. In the first cycle, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose of 225 \~ 300 iu is suggested to achieve plenty of ovarian stimulation for standards and maximize the benefits of superovulation. Because of the particularity of luteal support in the antagonist regimen, it is of great clinical significance to explore the trigger mode and combination mode of luteal support in the antagonist regimen for patients with poor prognosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedJanuary 28, 2021
January 1, 2021
9 months
January 18, 2021
January 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical pregnancy rate in each transplantation cycle
number of pregnant cases are confirmed by ultrasound/ total number of transplanted
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Rate of cancelled cycle
6 weeks
Number of mature eggs
6 weeks
Number of high-quality embryos
6 weeks
Implantation rate
6 weeks
Early abortion rate
6 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Double trigger unit
EXPERIMENTALHCG: 6000IU (Ovidrel: 250ug) + GnRH-a (Troprilin) 0.2mg
HCG trigger unit
SHAM COMPARATORHCG: 6000IU (Ovidrel: 250ug)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age less than or equal to 42 years old, AFC\<5 and or AMH\<1.2ng/ml ② Adopt antagonist program for controlled ovulation hyperstimulation (COH); patients with fresh cycle transplantation;
- Accept conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI);
- The ART treatment cycle is less than 3 times.
You may not qualify if:
- Abnormal chromosome karyotype;
- Severe endometriosis;
- Abnormal thyroid function; ④ Pregnancy contraindications; ⑤ Past history of ovarian tumors or after receiving radiotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Reproductive Medicine Center, The affiliated Drum Towel Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China
Related Publications (26)
Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
PMID: 21505041BACKGROUNDPoseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 26921622BACKGROUNDOrvieto R. Triggering final follicular maturation--hCG, GnRH-agonist or both, when and to whom? J Ovarian Res. 2015 Aug 21;8:60. doi: 10.1186/s13048-015-0187-6.
PMID: 26293447BACKGROUNDNakano R, Mizuno T, Kotsuji F, Katayama K, Wshio M, Tojo S. "Triggering" of ovulation after infusion of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LRF). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1973;52(3):269-72. doi: 10.3109/00016347309158325. No abstract available.
PMID: 4582787BACKGROUNDGonen Y, Balakier H, Powell W, Casper RF. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to trigger follicular maturation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990 Oct;71(4):918-22. doi: 10.1210/jcem-71-4-918.
PMID: 2119392BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Diedrich K, Devroey P, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):159-68. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi045. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
PMID: 16254001BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou EG, Diedrich K, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Ejdrup Bredkjaer H, Humaidan P. Triggering of final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin. Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
PMID: 17451691BACKGROUNDYoussef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, Aboulfoutouh I, van Wely M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
PMID: 25358904BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Meldrum D. Introduction: Management of the luteal phase in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):747-748. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.009.
PMID: 29778366BACKGROUNDLawrenz B, Coughlan C, Fatemi HM. Individualized luteal phase support. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;31(3):177-182. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000530.
PMID: 30855289BACKGROUNDGriffin D, Benadiva C, Kummer N, Budinetz T, Nulsen J, Engmann L. Dual trigger of oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin to optimize live birth rates in high responders. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
PMID: 22480822BACKGROUNDSchachter M, Friedler S, Ron-El R, Zimmerman AL, Strassburger D, Bern O, Raziel A. Can pregnancy rate be improved in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles by administering GnRH agonist before oocyte retrieval? A prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):1087-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1316. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PMID: 18023439BACKGROUNDLi S, Zhou D, Yin T, Xu W, Xie Q, Cheng D, Yang J. Dual trigger of triptorelin and HCG optimizes clinical outcome for high ovarian responder in GnRH-antagonist protocols. Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 4;9(4):5337-5343. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23916. eCollection 2018 Jan 12.
PMID: 29435182BACKGROUNDEftekhar M, Mojtahedi MF, Miraj S, Omid M. Final follicular maturation by administration of GnRH agonist plus HCG versus HCG in normal responders in ART cycles: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jul;15(7):429-434.
PMID: 29177244BACKGROUNDLin MH, Wu FS, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin SY, Hwu YM. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1976. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
PMID: 23993928BACKGROUNDZhou X, Guo P, Chen X, Ye D, Liu Y, Chen S. Comparison of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG alone trigger of oocyte maturation for normal ovarian responders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;141(3):327-331. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12457. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29388691BACKGROUNDLu X, Hong Q, Sun L, Chen Q, Fu Y, Ai A, Lyu Q, Kuang Y. Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation improves the oocyte retrieval rate of suboptimal responders to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1356-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1068. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
PMID: 27490046BACKGROUNDGriffin D, Feinn R, Engmann L, Nulsen J, Budinetz T, Benadiva C. Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose human chorionic gonadotropin to improve oocyte maturity rates. Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):405-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.028. Epub 2014 May 17.
PMID: 24842671BACKGROUNDGold JI, Stocker AA. Visual Decision-Making in an Uncertain and Dynamic World. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 15;3:227-250. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114511. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
PMID: 28715956BACKGROUNDBelova EV, Emtseva VP, Obolenskii IuA. [Characteristics of autonomic and hormonal reactions during the performance of different types of intellectual work]. Fiziol Cheloveka. 1988 May-Jun;14(3):482-5. No abstract available. Russian.
PMID: 2844614BACKGROUNDDeepika K, Rathore S, Garg N, Rao K. Empty follicle syndrome: Successful pregnancy following dual trigger. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;8(3):170-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.165152.
PMID: 26538861BACKGROUNDZilberberg E, Haas J, Dar S, Kedem A, Machtinger R, Orvieto R. Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG, for final oocyte maturation (double trigger), in patients with low proportion of mature oocytes. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Feb;31(2):145-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.978850. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PMID: 25385007BACKGROUNDOliveira SA, Calsavara VF, Cortes GC. Final Oocyte Maturation in Assisted Reproduction with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone agonist (Dual Trigger). JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Dec 1;20(4):246-250. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160047.
PMID: 28050961BACKGROUNDEser A, Devranoglu B, Bostanci Ergen E, Yayla Abide C. Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin for poor responders. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Jun 4;19(2):98-103. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0045. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
PMID: 29516855BACKGROUNDLin MH, Wu FS, Hwu YM, Lee RK, Li RS, Li SH. Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Jan 4;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0451-x.
PMID: 30609935BACKGROUNDDing N, Liu X, Jian Q, Liang Z, Wang F. Dual trigger of final oocyte maturation with a combination of GnRH agonist and hCG versus a hCG alone trigger in GnRH antagonist cycle for in vitro fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Nov;218:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
PMID: 28957685BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical College
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2021
First Posted
January 22, 2021
Study Start
January 20, 2021
Primary Completion
October 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
January 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01