Evaluating the Use of 0.5 and 0.75 MAC Desflurane in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery
Evaluating the Use of Desflurane in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using 0.5 and 0.75 MAC Desflurane
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Somatosensory- (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are commonly used as an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring tool to detect aberrations to the spinal cord integrity during spinal surgery. Inhalational anaesthetic agents have a significant influence on evoked potentials by suppressing the amplitude and prolonging the latency. Evidences suggest that total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is superior to inhalation anaesthesia for neuromonitoring in spinal surgery, and support the use of up to 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anaesthetic agents in these procedures. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal surgeries will be prospectively recruited and be induced with TIVA at baseline of the evoked potentials. They will be randomized to receive balance anaesthesia with A) Desflurane MAC 0.5+remifentanil, or B) Desflurane MAC 0.75+remifentanil until the end of surgery. Influence of 1.0 MAC desflurane on the evoked potentials after the completion of surgery will also be studied. Desired Results: Endpoints include the changes to the amplitude and latency of SSEPs and MEPs with 0.5 and 0.75 MAC desflurane. The findings will indicate the safety of desflurane at the studied concentrations for spinal surgeries, and substantial savings with the use of desflurane instead of TIVA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2024
CompletedFebruary 20, 2025
February 1, 2025
3 years
January 13, 2021
February 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)
Amplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)
Latency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)
Morphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)
Amplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)
Latency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)
Morphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane
During surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts)
intraoperative
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds)
intraoperative
Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response)
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
0.75 MAC desflurane
EXPERIMENTALThe effects of 0.75 MAC desflurane on the amplitude and latency of evoked potentials in spinal surgeries will be examined.
0.5 MAC desflurane
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe effects of 0.5 MAC desflurane on the amplitude and latency of evoked potentials in spinal surgeries will be examined.
Interventions
Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.5 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery.
Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.75 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery.
On completion of the neuromonitoring phase of surgery, the patients will be maintained on 1.0 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥ 21 years old, scheduled for spinal surgery.
- Patients who require SSEP/MEP and with no neurological deficits.
- Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist I-III physical status.
- Consenting patients.
- Elective procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with sensory or motor deficits preoperatively.
- Patients with significant cardiovascular and/or respiratory disease.
- Emergency procedures.
- Cord injury secondary to trauma.
- Non-consenting patients.
- Category A patients (Prisoners).
- Patients with previous stroke.
- Patients with Hep C, HIV.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, 529889, Singapore
Related Publications (3)
Hasan MS, Tan JK, Chan CYW, Kwan MK, Karim FSA, Goh KJ. Comparison between effect of desflurane/remifentanil and propofol/remifentanil anesthesia on somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery-A randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018789529. doi: 10.1177/2309499018789529.
PMID: 30058437BACKGROUNDSloan TB, Toleikis JR, Toleikis SC, Koht A. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3% desflurane. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
PMID: 24643708BACKGROUNDMacdonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C; American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;124(12):2291-316. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PMID: 24055297BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wai May Leong, MMed
Changi General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2021
First Posted
January 20, 2021
Study Start
April 14, 2021
Primary Completion
March 27, 2024
Study Completion
March 27, 2024
Last Updated
February 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share