COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
EFFECT OF COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURALTHERAPY IN TREATMENT OF CHRONIC NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To explore the effect of adding cognitive-behavioral therapy to physical therapy interventions in patients with chronic non-specific back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 20, 2021
January 1, 2021
5 months
January 13, 2021
January 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Arabic ODI for function
a)ODI ASSESMENT: Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. In pre session and after end of sessions This Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at5 If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% Scores: 1- (0% to 20%): minimal disability 2-(21%-40%: moderate disability) 3- (41%-60%): severe disability 4-(61%-80%: crippled) 5-(81%-100%) These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms
5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Numerical rating scale
5 minutes
Tape measurement
5 minutes
Fear avoidance belief questionnaire
5 minutes
Study Arms (2)
physical therapy intervention
EXPERIMENTAL1. core stability exercises: 1. Multifidus exercises 2. Frontal \& Side Plank exercise 3. Pelvic floor exercises 4. abdominal exercises 2. Strengthening exercises 1. Bridging 2. straight leg raise 3. gluteus medius strength 4. gluteus maximus strengthening for about 20 min to 30 min to strength back and proximal hip control muscles
graded exposure and graded activity in addition to phycal therapy intervention
EXPERIMENTAL1. Graded exposure:This approach followed a model where the patient was gradually exposed to previously pain provocative, feared and or avoided tasks. These activities are started at a diminished level that elicits minimal amounts of fear and then gradually increased to situations that elicit larger amounts of fear patients are asked to create a hierarchy of feared activities. The exposure starts with the least feared activity, and the therapist helps the patient appraise the exposure and its consequences and then address irrational and counterproductive beliefs, leading to reductions in the anxiety associated with the activity 2. Graded activity exercises: The new postural and movement behaviors were integrated into each person's nominated pain provocative functional activities linked to their goals in order to generalize learning and build self-efficacy the program focuses on functional activities for about 10 min before physical therapy program (strengthening)
Interventions
1. Graded exposure: This approach followed a model where the patient was gradually exposed to previously pain provocative, feared and or avoided tasks. These activities are started at a diminished level that elicits minimal amounts of fear and then gradually increased to situations that elicit larger amounts of fear patients are asked to create a hierarchy of feared activities. The exposure starts with the least feared activity, and the therapist helps the patient appraise the exposure and its consequences and then address irrational and counterproductive beliefs, leading to reductions in the anxiety associated with the activity 2. Graded activity exercises: The new postural and movement behaviors were integrated into each person's nominated pain provocative functional activities linked to their goals in order to generalize learning and build self-efficacy the program focuses on functional activities and progresses in a time contingent manner
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient's age between 25-40 years.
- Patients have persistent Chronic Non-specific LBP for at least 3 months with or without leg pain. Leg pain won't exceeds mechanical behaviors.
- Score of 24 fear avoidance questionnaire.
- Symptoms of hypersensitivity, secondary punctate or pressure hyperalgesia and fear of movement as a central sensitization symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous back surgery. 2- History of previous hip, knee or ankle surgeries. 3- Systemic inflammatory diseases. 4-Tumors. 5-Red flags of back pain 6-Patients with disc pathology and radicular pain 7- spinal fracture or spinal surgery 8- systemic disease or TB of spine widespread constant non-specific pain disorder, pain without a clear mechanical behavior
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
Giza, Egypt
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The main investigator will perform the physical therapy program after referral by Blind assessor after assessment. Main investigator start the treatment based on the randomization made by the software after the referral so he will not know the assessment results before and after he treatment and the assessor will not know the randomization results and the patient group selected for treatment So this procedures will be done by double blind procedure for the main investigator and research assistance.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- phyisical therapist at qena oncology center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2021
First Posted
January 20, 2021
Study Start
October 20, 2020
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01