Comparison of Aorto-iliac Endovascular Interventions With and Without the EndoNaut Workstation
COM-ENDO
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study is to demonstrate that the use of EndoNaut for aortoiliac endovascular procedures has a clinical impact for the patient (reduction in irradiation and the volume of contrast product) as well as for the nursing staff (reduction irradiation) compared to procedures performed without EndoNaut.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedJanuary 19, 2021
January 1, 2021
1 year
January 15, 2021
January 15, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Volume of contrast product used during the routine care procedure (ml)
Volume are reported in mL
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: evaluation of the Fluoroscopy duration (min)
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: dose-area quantification (mGy/m2)
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: measurement of air Kerma (mGy)
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Procedure time (min)
At enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Procedures with EndoNaut
Endovascular interventions using the EndoNaut workstation. 3D image fusion is used for overlaying arterial information on top of fluoroscopic images
Procedures without EndoNaut
Control group, endovascular interventions without 3D image fusion
Interventions
Percutaneous procedure with stent placement
Eligibility Criteria
Male and female patients with unilateral or bilateral common iliac aneurysm or stenosis, treated with endovascular technique
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral or bilateral aorto-iliac or iliac aneurysm/stenosis
- Suitable for endovascular repair
- Major patients
- Patients not opposed to their participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients requiring conventional surgical revascularization.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Therenvalead
- Rennes University Hospitalcollaborator
- Douai hospitalcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijoncollaborator
- University Hospital, Brestcollaborator
- Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitainecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2021
First Posted
January 19, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
January 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share