NCT04713683

Brief Summary

Percutaneous PFO closure has been established as a first-line therapy for preventing recurrent strokes in selected patients. The devices used for the specific purpose contain and release nickel, which is considered as the most allergen metal in nature. Skin patch tests are considered as gold-standard for documenting nickel allergy. While the allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel is well described, literature is inadequate on explaining the effect of nickel release on the clinical manifestations of patients implanted with such devices. Our prospective, randomized, blinded trial will try to investigate the above by performing nickel skin patch tests to all patients, 14 days before and 90 days after the implantation. During follow-up, clinical manifestations and transthoracic echocardiographic findings will be evaluated and associated with patch skin tests.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 10, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2021

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

January 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

patent foramen ovalepercutaneous pfo closureNickel HypersensitivityNickel Sensitisationdevice syndromeskin patch tests

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Device syndrome, a composite endpoint consisting of patient-reported new-onset chest pain, palpitations, new-onset or worsening migraines, dyspnea, and rash

    Clinical signs and symptoms during the first 90 days after the procedure will be evaluated through a questionnaire.

    The first 90 days after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • The nickel patch tests' results change after Amplatzer Device implantation

    The first 90 days after the procedure

  • The nickel patch tests' results change after Gore Device implantation

    The first 90 days after the procedure

  • Residual interatrial leakage

    90 days after the procedure

  • Rest allergens skin patch test results' change

    90 days after the procedure

  • Nickel patch test results' change

    90 days after the procedure

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Amplatzer PFO Occluder

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized in this arm will be implanted with Amplatzer PFO Occluder.

Device: Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Gore Cardioform Septal

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized in this arm will be implanted with Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder.

Device: Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Interventions

Patients with well-documented embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are indicated for percutaneous closure of PFO. The intervention is performed through the right femoral vein. The interventional cardiologist introduces the sheath and advances the device via inferior vena cava to right atrium. Then, the catheter is passed through the PFO, the device is deployed and the occlusion is achieved. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopy guidance with or without transesophageal echocardiography guidance.

Also known as: Transcatheter PFO occlusion
Amplatzer PFO OccluderGore Cardioform Septal

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: at least 14 years old
  • Well-documented indication for percutaneous PFO closure

You may not qualify if:

  • Corticosteroid treatment
  • Patient's refusal to participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens

Athens, Attica, 115 28, Greece

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Apostolos A, Drakopoulou M, Toutouzas K. New migraines after atrial septal defect occlusion. Is the nickel hypersensitivity the start of everything? Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jan;146:110442. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110442. Epub 2020 Nov 30. No abstract available.

  • Ahlstrom MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menne T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Oct;81(4):227-241. doi: 10.1111/cod.13327. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

  • Schalock PC, Crawford G, Nedorost S, Scheinman PL, Atwater AR, Mowad C, Brod B, Ehrlich A, Watsky KL, Sasseville D, Silvestri D, Worobec SM, Elliott JF, Honari G, Powell DL, Taylor J, DeKoven J. Patch Testing for Evaluation of Hypersensitivity to Implanted Metal Devices: A Perspective From the American Contact Dermatitis Society. Dermatitis. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):241-7. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000210.

  • Prestipino F, Pragliola C, Lusini M, Chello M. Nickel allergy induced systemic reaction to an intracardiac amplatzer device. J Card Surg. 2014 May;29(3):349-50. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12331.

  • Apostolos A, Gregoriou S, Drakopoulou M, Trantalis G, Tsiogka A, Ktenopoulos N, Aggeli K, Stratigos A, Tsioufis K, Toutouzas K. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Patients With and Without Nickel Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr;18(4):e015228. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015228. Epub 2025 Mar 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Foramen Ovale, PatentDermatitis, Irritant

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Septal Defects, AtrialHeart Septal DefectsHeart Defects, CongenitalCardiovascular AbnormalitiesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesDermatitis, ContactDermatitisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases, Eczematous

Study Officials

  • Konstantinos Toutouzas, MD,PhD

    First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Anastasios Apostolos, MD

    First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Stamatios Gregoriou, MD, PhD

    First Department of Dermatology-Venereolgy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Syggros Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The dermatologist will be blinded regarding the device implanted in the patients. The interventional cardiologist will be blinded regarding the results of skin tests. The outcomes assessor will be blinded for both skin patch tests and the implanted device of each participant.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Cardiology, First Department of Cardiology, Medical School

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2021

First Posted

January 19, 2021

Study Start

December 10, 2020

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations