Hypnoanalgesia for Dermatological Surgery in Children
Effectiveness of Hypnoanalgesia for Dermatological Surgery in Children: Randomised Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effect of hypnosedation on the need of sedation and analgesia in a pediatric population undergoing dermatological surgery, both during the procedure, and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, a secondary objetive is to evaluate the effect by specific age groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2021
CompletedJanuary 13, 2021
January 1, 2021
6 months
September 17, 2020
January 10, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Total dose of propofol in mg/kg
Measured in mg/kg weight
During surgery (Intra-operative)
Total dose of propofol in mg
Measured in total mg
During surgery (Intra-operative)
Additional need for opioids during surgery
Yes/no
During surgery (Intra-operative)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pain intensity in older children post-operative
Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in younger children post-operative
Immediately post-operative while on recovery unit
Pain intensity in older children after 24 hours
24 hours after discharge
Pain intensity in younger children after 24 hours
24 hours after discharge
Analgesic need
24 hours after discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Degree of satisfaction with the procedure
24 hours after discharge
Study Arms (2)
Attention-Distraction techniques
PLACEBO COMPARATORA high-tech distraction technique (Apple®), passive and chosen by the child, either an animated video or his or her favourite music. After standard intravenous sedation, the child is taken to the operating theatre to watch his or her favourite video or music and this is maintained throughout the procedure.
HIPNOSIS GROUP
EXPERIMENTALA technique of rapid conversational hypnosis, with focus on therapeutic suggestion (guiding the patient into a hypnotic trance), adapted to the child's cognitive development. Induction with hypnotic suggestion focuses and accompanies the child's body sensations and allows their active participation. After standard sedation, therapeutic suggestion is maintained throughout the surgery and in the post-hypnotic period before awakening.
Interventions
Rapid conversational hypnosis
i-pad with movies, games and music
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A class I or II of anaesthetic risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists,
- to be in a percentile between P3 and P97 in weight and height,
- without known drug allergies, and
- having fasted 6 hours for solids and 2 hours for water.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with diagnosed mental retardation or attention deficit,
- behavioural disorders,
- previous treatment with hypnosis,
- history of neurological pathology or psychomotor retardation,
- previous pain-related pathology,
- obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Complejo Hospitalario Toledo
Toledo, 45002, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Friedrichsdorf SJ, Kohen DP. Integration of hypnosis into pediatric palliative care. Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;7(1):136-150. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.05.02. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PMID: 28866891BACKGROUNDKendrick C, Sliwinski J, Yu Y, Johnson A, Fisher W, Kekecs Z, Elkins G. Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(1):75-115. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405.
PMID: 26599994BACKGROUNDBrown ML, Rojas E, Gouda S. A Mind-Body Approach to Pediatric Pain Management. Children (Basel). 2017 Jun 20;4(6):50. doi: 10.3390/children4060050.
PMID: 28632194BACKGROUNDFriedrichsdorf SJ, Goubert L. Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children. Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 19;5(1):e804. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000804. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
PMID: 32072099BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juana Maria PELAEZ PEREZ, PH
Complejo Hospitalario Toledo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Different investigators are assigned to each phase of the study, with one designated as responsible for recruitment (MQD), another for intervention and control (JMPP), and another for subsequent evaluation in the post-anaesthesia recovery unit (URPA) and at 24 hours (responsible nursing staff).
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 15, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Up to 1 year after publication
- Access Criteria
- Justified interest in data. By e-mail to PI
Any document upon reasonable request to the PI.