The Effect of Biomechanical Scapular Mobilization With Movement and Motor Learning

NCT04701814 | Completed Results DMC

• 1 other identifier: PUA 201901013
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 38
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

the study about new mobilization technique used in shoulder impingement syndrome patient to increase the range of motion of elevation, decrease the pain, and increasing the function level, this technique is based on normal mechanics that occur inside the joint during certain movement.

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Visual Analogue Scale

  1\. Visual Analogue Scale: was used to evaluate the intensity of pain, which The pain VAS is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, usually, 10 centimetres in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10 centimetres).

  3 weeks

• Universal Goniometer

  Universal goniometer: was used to measure the available range of motion at a joint. where used to measure an available range of motion of abduction and flexion of the shoulder joint.

  3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

group A (controlled group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

received passive range of motion (PROM)/ active assisted range of motion (AAROM)/ active range of motion (AROM) exercises, strengthen of rotator cuff, biceps, shoulder and scapular muscles, ultrasound (5 min. - 1.5 W/c.m2 - 1 MHZ), electrical stimulation ( interferential bipolar technique for 20 min. on shoulder joint). This treatment was repeated three times per weeks with 24 hours rest for 3 weeks.

Other: biomechanical scapular mobilization with movement and motor learning

group B(Study group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients in group B received biomechanical scapular mobilization with movement and motor learning and traditional methods.

Other: biomechanical scapular mobilization with movement and motor learning

Interventions

biomechanical scapular mobilization with movement and motor learning OTHER

the therapist applied posterior tilt and exteral rotation with upward rotation mobilization to scapula and therapist also warp bilt around GH joint to applied inferior and posterior glid then ask patient to elevate his arm. then we applied motor learning approach by asking patient to elevate his arm with maintaining of external rotation with posterior glid of scapula.

group A (controlled group); group B(Study group)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 25 Years - 50 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• clinical diagnosis: shoulder impingement syndrome.
• History of shoulder pain when they elevated their arm.
• Limited range of motion due to the pain.
• Pain localized at the painful point at proximal anterolateral shoulder region or medical diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome with at least 2 positive impingement tests including Neer, Hawkins, or Jobe test.

You may not qualify if:

• Fibromyalgia.
• Fracture, dislocation, or subluxation of the shoulder.
• history of trauma.
• shoulder surgery.
• numbness or tingling in the upper limb.
• Corticosteroids injection within 1 year.
• systemic illness.
• ligamentous laxity

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Pharos University in Alexandria: lead

Study Sites (1)

Pharos university in Alexandria

Alexandria, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Surenkok O, Aytar A, Baltaci G. Acute effects of scapular mobilization in shoulder dysfunction: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2009 Nov;18(4):493-501. doi: 10.1123/jsr.18.4.493.

  PMID: 20108851 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Interventions

Movement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Shoulder Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Results Point of Contact

• Title: P.T Moataz Abdelaal
• Organization: Pharos university in Alexandria

moataz.abd.student@pua.edu.eg

1060081213

Study Officials

• Moataz A. Mohamed, (B.Sc.P.T.)

  Pharos University in Alexandria

  STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: Yes

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Demonstrator in Faculty of Physical Therapy, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Model Details: Patients were divided randomly in two equal groups (A and B): Group A (controlled group): They were received traditional physical therapy program including: passive range of motion (PROM)/ active assisted range of motion (AAROM)/ active range of motion (AROM), strengthen of rotator cuff, biceps, shoulder and scapular muscles, ultrasound (5 min. - 1.5 W/c.m2 - 1 MHZ), electrical stimulation ( interferential bipolar technique for 20 min. on shoulder joint). Group B (study group): they have received the same physical therapy program as in group A, in addition to Biomechanical scapular mobilization with movement and motor learning.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: January 5, 2021
• First Posted: January 8, 2021
• Study Start: May 5, 2021
• Primary Completion: October 22, 2021
• Study Completion: November 14, 2021
• Last Updated: May 18, 2022
• Results First Posted: April 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations

EG (1)