Efficacy and Safety of Renalof® in the Removal of Calculi Smaller Than 10 mm Located in the Reno-Ureteral Tract
1 other identifier
interventional
155
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Given the high recurrence of urolithiasis in patients, the search for less aggressive and preventive treatments is increasingly necessary. Renalof® is presented as an alternative to herbal medicine being a product that, due to its diuretic and demineralization properties of kidney stones, has been widely used in this patient population, disintegrating and eliminating calcium oxalate and struvite stones in a painless in the genitourinary system. With the objective of determining the efficacy of this therapy, an observational, prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm study was carried out: treatment group with Renalof® and control group, placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2021
CompletedJanuary 6, 2021
December 1, 2020
11 months
December 15, 2020
January 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
kidney stone clearance with Renalof® treatment compared to placebo
kidney stone clearance with Renalof® treatment compared to placebo measured by ultrasound and tomography imaging
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Quality of life of patients
4 months
Number of colic
4 months
Adverse events related with product of the trial
4 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Cost of treatment
4 months
Study Arms (2)
Renalof
EXPERIMENTALA total of 120 patients treated with the study product Renalof® at a dose of 650 mg twice daily were followed for 4 months. A preliminary analysis of the types of stones present in the study patients was performed according to the main compound, using a biophysical profile by biochemical analysis and the clinical characteristics, medical history and biochemical profile of the creatinine values of the test patients. Imaging and quality of life tests were carried out during the trial to check the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the test product in patients with kidney stones.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORA total of 35 patients treated with the study product Placebo at a dose of 650 mg twice daily were followed for 4 months. A preliminary analysis of the types of stones present in the study patients was performed according to the main compound, using a biophysical profile by biochemical analysis and the clinical characteristics, medical history and biochemical profile of the creatinine values of the test patients. Imaging and quality of life tests were carried out during the trial to check the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the test product in patients with kidney stones.
Interventions
A total of 120 patients treated with the study product Renalof® at a dose of 650 mg twice daily were followed for 4 months. A preliminary analysis of the types of stones present in the study patients was performed according to the main compound, using a biophysical profile by biochemical analysis and the clinical characteristics, medical history and biochemical profile of the creatinine values of the test patients. Imaging and quality of life tests were carried out during the trial to check the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the test product in patients with kidney stones.
A total of 35 patients treated with Placebo at a dose of 650 mg twice daily were followed for 4 months. A preliminary analysis of the types of stones present in the study patients was performed according to the main compound, using a biophysical profile by biochemical analysis and the clinical characteristics, medical history and biochemical profile of the creatinine values of the test patients. Imaging and quality of life tests were carried out during the trial to check the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the test product in patients with kidney stones.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years of age, in all their mental and physical capacities to decide to be part of this study.
- There are no comorbidities or associated diseases that put the stability of the patient at risk.
- Not be diagnosed as Chronic Kidney Disease, in any stage.
- Existence of non-obstructive stones smaller than 10 mm located in the renoureteral path.
- No compromise of renal viability.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years of age.
- Existence of comorbidities or associated diseases that put the stability of the patient at risk.
- Existence of a diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease, at any stage.
- Presence of non-obstructive or obstructive stones greater than 10 mm located in the renoureteral path.
- Renal viability compromise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Catalysis SLlead
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Seniors Managua
Managua, 13035, Nicaragua
Related Publications (11)
Tsujihata M. Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. Int J Urol. 2008 Feb;15(2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01953.x.
PMID: 18269444BACKGROUNDJohnson CM, Wilson DM, O'Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int. 1979 Nov;16(5):624-31. doi: 10.1038/ki.1979.173.
PMID: 548606BACKGROUNDSoucie JM, Coates RJ, McClellan W, Austin H, Thun M. Relation between geographic variability in kidney stones prevalence and risk factors for stones. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Mar 1;143(5):487-95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008769.
PMID: 8610664BACKGROUNDWesson JA, Johnson RJ, Mazzali M, Beshensky AM, Stietz S, Giachelli C, Liaw L, Alpers CE, Couser WG, Kleinman JG, Hughes J. Osteopontin is a critical inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystal formation and retention in renal tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Jan;14(1):139-47. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000040593.93815.9d.
PMID: 12506146BACKGROUNDKohri K, Yasui T, Okada A, Hirose M, Hamamoto S, Fujii Y, Niimi K, Taguchi K. Biomolecular mechanism of urinary stone formation involving osteopontin. Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):623-37. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0514-y. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
PMID: 23124115BACKGROUNDMykoniatis I, Sarafidis P, Memmos D, Anastasiadis A, Dimitriadis G, Hatzichristou D. Are endourological procedures for nephrolithiasis treatment associated with renal injury? A review of potential mechanisms and novel diagnostic indexes. Clin Kidney J. 2020 May 22;13(4):531-541. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa020. eCollection 2020 Aug.
PMID: 32905259BACKGROUNDGrases F, Ramis M, Costa-Bauza A, March JG. Effect of Herniaria hirsuta and Agropyron repens on calcium oxalate urolithiasis risk in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1995 Mar;45(3):211-4. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(94)01218-o.
PMID: 7623486BACKGROUNDBeydokthi SS, Sendker J, Brandt S, Hensel A. Traditionally used medicinal plants against uncomplicated urinary tract infections: Hexadecyl coumaric acid ester from the rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) P. Beauv. with antiadhesive activity against uropathogenic E. coli. Fitoterapia. 2017 Mar;117:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
PMID: 28040531BACKGROUNDPaslawska S, Piekos R. Studies on the optimum conditions of extraction of silicon species from plants with water. IV. Agropyron repens. Planta Med. 1976 Nov;30(3):216-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1097720. No abstract available.
PMID: 1005521BACKGROUNDBragadottir G, Redfors B, Ricksten SE. Mannitol increases renal blood flow and maintains filtration fraction and oxygenation in postoperative acute kidney injury: a prospective interventional study. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 17;16(4):R159. doi: 10.1186/cc11480.
PMID: 22901953BACKGROUNDHagerstrom E, Lindberg L, Bentzen J, Brodbaek K, Zerahn B, Kristensen B. The Nephroprotective Effect of Mannitol in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Cisplatin Therapy. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2019 Jan 7;13:1179554918821320. doi: 10.1177/1179554918821320. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30670924BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2020
First Posted
January 6, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR