Feasibility of Remote Evaluation and Monitoring of Acoustic Pathophysiological Signals With External Sensor Technology in Covid-19
REMAP-WEST-COV
A Small-scale Study to Capture Acoustic Pathophysiological Parameters, in the Community, Through a Wearable Device, and to Evaluate the Technical and Practical Feasibility of Utilising This Data as Part of a Medical Device System for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Covid-19 at Home
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a novel medical device system for autonomously monitoring of breath and heart sounds in Covid-19 (detecting and monitoring the progression of Covid-19 pneumonitis, by evaluating sounds captured through a wearable device (Senti)). As a first-in-man study, the investigators will investigate the safety of the Senti device, the usability and acceptability of the device; and ensure technical and practical feasibility of the device in a real-world clinical setting. Healthcare resources have been stretched substantially by Covid-19. Devices which enable patients to be monitored at home and direct these precious resources to those who require them are needed more than ever. 10 patients will be recruited (the study participants) in two tranches (6 and 4) who are being discharged from A\&E into the community, with Covid-19. These patients will wear the Senti device. The first tranche will use the device over a single session lasting 20 minutes only. The second tranche (which will include patients from tranche one, and which will only proceed if no adverse events are detected in tranche one), participants will wear the device at their discretion (particularly encouraged to wear overnight) over the course of 5 days. The investigators will survey the study participants to answer three key questions: What is the feasibility of the Senti data-capture device? Is this device usable in clinical practice? What are the requirements to train patients to use the device? The investigators will also consider: Does the device function technically and practically, in real-world clinical scenarios? What are the key expected and unexpected safety issues related to using the device (with a particular emphasis on whether the device is likely to cause pressure sores)? These questions will establish the feasibility of using the Senti data capture device as part of a novel medical device system for the autonomous evaluation and monitoring of bioacoustic signals for Covid-19.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable covid19
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable covid19
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 5, 2021
January 1, 2021
1 month
January 1, 2021
January 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Patient-rated device acceptability
Patient questionnaire "on a scale of 1 ("I would not approve at all") to 5 ("I would greatly approve and would like this to become standard practice"), to what extent would you approve of this device being used to enable clinicians to assess your heart and lung sounds as part of a telephone consultation?"
1 month
Patient-rated device comfort
Patient questionnaire "on a scale of 1 ("Very difficult to use") to 5 ("Very easy to use"), how easy to use is the device?"
1 month
Patient-rated device ease of use
Patient questionnaire "on a scale of 1 ("Too uncomfortable to use for more than an hours or so") to 5 ("As comfortable as a T-Shirt"), how comfortable is the device?"
1 month
Expert-rated device data quality
An appropriately qualified person (with clinical experience of auscultation) to rate quality of data captured by the device, as compared subjectively against the quality that they typically expect from standard auscultation, on a scale of 1 ("Much poorer data quality \[than standard auscultation\]") to 3 ("equivocal data quality") to 5 ("Much higher data quality").
1 month
Adverse events and adverse device events
The number of participants experiencing adverse events, both arising from use of the device or otherwise, will be reported. Adverse events will be categorised as unexpected or expected, serious or otherwise, device-related or un-related.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Length of time spent with the device on the patient.
1 month
Length of time taken for the patient to apply the device
1 month
Time spent to train patients to use the device.
1 month
Pressure sore EPUAP grade
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Senti Arm
EXPERIMENTALIn stage 1 of this study (6 patients), the patient will apply the device and complete the initial patient survey; questions are around usability, comfort (including feelings of pressure), and acceptability. The Investigator will record the time taken to apply the device. A brief 30 seconds of chest sounds will be recorded from each of the nine sensors on the device in three different settings: standing up, lying down, walking around. In stage 2 of this study (10 patients; 6 of whom would be re-recruited from the first stage), the participant will use the device at home over five days. The Investigator will assess the participant daily for any signs of pressure sores or complications from using the device (including topical allergic reactions). The participant will complete a daily survey. The participant is encouraged to remove the device and apply it at their discretion. The participant can opt-out of wearing the device at any stage.
Interventions
This device class I, CE marked garment, with a similar form to a T-Shirt, embedded with ten sensor modules encased in silicone; the device comes with a charging stand in the form of a clothes hanger. Depending on the outcome of this feasibility study, the device may, in the future, form part of a class IIb medical device system, when accompanied by cloud-based software to listen to both current and historically recorded breath sounds for each Senti patient. The Senti Version One device will be labelled clearly to indicate the device version, on the inside of the garment, conforming to the MDR. The garment itself will be made from textile composite, including cotton, elastase, micromodel, spandex, and polyester. All other components (including electronic and other plastic components) will be entirely encased in medical-grade silicone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients attending A\&E with Covid-19 or suspected Covid-19, who are being discharged from A\&E into the community.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to give their consent.
- Patients with a known sensitivity or allergy to any of the components of the device.
- Patients with any active implanted devices (such as pacemakers or vagal nerve stimulators).
- Patients with existing pressure sores across the area this device would come into contact (predominantly, across the thorax).
- Patients with significant cognitive impairment or limiting physical disabilities - to the extent that they are not able to manage their own ADLs; except where sufficient family or care support is available to manage the device functions (in which case, the device may be used with caution).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Senti Tech
Liverpool, Merseyside, L1 0AX, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2021
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share