Comparison Between Two Physical Therapy Treatments in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Non-specific chronic neck pain is a very prevalent condition in the population ranging from 45% to 54%. Several conservative treatments have been shown to be effective and are currently used in clinical practice. However, among the physical therapy ones, no study evaluated the effectiveness of Pompage techniques in addition to an active treatment. This protocol describes a controlled, randomized trial that aims to assess the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Methods: Seventy subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain from 18 to 80 years will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Afterwards they will be randomized to one of the 2 groups: group 1 (G1) will undergo an active intervention and group 2 (G2) will receive the same active intervention plus manual technique. Active intervention, according to the current guidelines on non-specific neck pain, will be a treatment including both pain education and home exercises; manual technique will be the so-called "Pompage" technique. A booster session will be planned for both groups after 4 weeks from the beginning of the trial, to reinforce the patients adherence to the self-treatment. The patients will be evaluated before the treatments (baseline, T0), after 8 weeks from the beginning of the treatments (T1), and 6 months after the end of the treatments (T2). The primary outcome will be pain perception, which will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes will be: kinesiophobia (measured with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia - TSK), physical function (measured with the Neck Disability Index - NDI), active cervical range of motion - ROM (measured with the "CROM Deluxe" device), patient satisfaction for treatment (measured with the Physical Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire - PTPSQI(15)), and subjective perception of improvement (measured with the Global Perceived Effect - GPE). Adverse effects will be registered. Discussion: Considering that there is no consensus on the use of Pompage techniques in addition to an active treatment in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain, our protocol will be the basis for the use of these techniques by health professionals and for new studies to be performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2022
CompletedSeptember 2, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.4 years
December 13, 2020
September 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in neck pain
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[100-mm scale\]).
At baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Changes in neck disability
At baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.
Changes in Kinesiophobia/Fear of movement
At baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.
Changes in Active Cervical Range of Motion
At baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.
Assessment of the satisfaction for physical therapy
At 8 weeks and 6 months.
Assessment of the global perception of improvement on a 7-points Likert Scale
At 8 weeks and 6 months.
Study Arms (2)
Active physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive intervention (including both pain education and home exercises). A 60-minutes education session will be provided, concerning pain mechanisms and management and a demonstration of the exercises to perform individually at home. Home exercises will be performed daily. To support patients during the treatment, a booklet will be created. One 30-minutes booster session will be planned after 4 weeks. Patients will follow this active intervention for 8 weeks.
Active physical therapy plus manual therapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the Group 2 will receive active intervention plus 8 "Pompage" technique sessions (1 session/week). In these sessions (30 minutes each), "Pompage" technique will be performed by a physical therapist.
Interventions
One session (60 minutes). In this session, a physical therapist will explain and demonstrate the exercises to perform individually at home. Exercises will be performed daily. In addition, an education session will be provided, concerning pain mechanisms and management. To support patients during the treatment, a booklet will be created. One booster session (30minutes) will be planned after 4 weeks. Patients will follow the active treatment for 8 weeks.
Participants in the Group 2 will receive active intervention plus 8 "Pompage" technique sessions (1 session/week). In these sessions (30 minutes each), "Pompage" technique will be performed by a physical therapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female and male subjects aged between 18 and 80 years with non-specific neck pain lasting for more than 3 months.
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with acute or subacute neck pain;
- Subjects with specific etiology for neck pain (e.g. trauma, herniated disc, vertebral deformities, fractures);
- Subjects with central or peripheral neurological signs;
- Individuals with systemic diseases, neuromuscular diseases, rheumatic diseases, cognitive deficit, tumors;
- Subjects who underwent surgery within 6 months preceding enrollment;
- Subjects who underwent physical therapy treatment within 6 months preceding enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Bologna - Italy
Bologna, 40138, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paolo Pillastrini, Professor
University of Bologna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Statistician (data analyst) will be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2020
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
February 9, 2021
Primary Completion
June 17, 2022
Study Completion
August 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share