Patient Satisfaction and OHRQoL In Removable Versus Fixed Implant Prostheses
Assessment Of Patient Satisfaction and Oral-health Related Quality of Life In Completely Edentulous Patients Receiving Removable Implant Overdentures Versus Fixed Implant Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives to evaluate the oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients, when restored by maxillary and mandibular fixed (screw-retained) or removable telescopic retained implant supported prosthesis. 19 patients were randomized to receive either a fixed or a removable maxillary and mandibular full arch implant prosthesis. They were then asked to answer the OHIP-14 and a patient satisfaction questionnaire at 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-prosthetic insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedMarch 10, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
December 24, 2020
March 8, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction
questionnaire. The patient satisfaction questionnaire is composed of 14 questions concerned with esthetics, speech, mastication, operative and prosthetic procedures, incidence of complications, pre-operative instructions, total time interval, cost, operator, hygienic procedures, overall experience as well as the willingness to repeat or refer others for the procedure.
2 weeks after prosthetic insertion- 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
oral health related quality of life
2 weeks after prosthetic insertion- 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Fixed implant supported prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALthe prosthesis is an all-on-four prosthesis composed of a hybrid prosthesis. a metal framework, acrylic resin denture base and acrylic resin teeth
Removable implant supported prosthesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe prosthesis is an all-on-four prosthesis composed of a telescopic retained overdenture, both primary and secondary copings are custom made. the secondary copings are conncetd via a metal framework
Interventions
The wax of the trial denture was converted into heat-cured acrylic resin using conventional packing and flasking techniques. The prosthesis was finished, polished and screwed in the patient's mouth. Engaging (Internal hex) cylindrical, plastic patterns (Octa plastic cylinder, multi unit abutment, Red, Dentis, Daegu -Korea) were used to construct the primary copings of the telescopic prosthesis.The finished primary copings were scanned using a lab scanner (Shera Echo-scan 7. Dental Wings, Montreal-Canada). This was necessary to design and to mill the wax pattern of the secondary copings using CAD/CAM technology (Dental Wings Software, Dental Wings, Montreal -Canada). Secondary coping was designed to properly fit to the primary coping. The framework was then tried in. At that time it was ready for its intra-oral luting to the secondary copings.
Framework of the hybrid prosthesis is waxed using plastic copings attached to multiunit abutments. once the framework is finished , bite is recorded, teeth are set up and the waxed up prosthesis are tried in. IF accepted the wax is eliminated the wax up denture is converted inti heat cured acrylic resin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Completely edentulous male patients with an age range from 40- 70 years.
- Patients with a HbA1c equal to or less than 7
- All patients should have normal maxillo-mandibular relationship (Angle class I).
- Patients should have maxillary and mandibular ridges at least 7mm in width and 13 mm in height in the interforaminal areas and in the esthetic zones (premolar to premolar regions), respectively. This accommodated a pre-planned implant size of 3.7mm x 10 or 11mm.
- The maxillary and mandibular ridges should be covered by keratinized attached mucosa at least 5mm in width.
- An interarch space between the edentulous maxillary and mandibular ridges should not be less than 22 mm to accommodate the planned maxillary and mandibular implant-supported prostheses. This was confirmed by mounted diagnostic casts.
- Patients who were cooperative and who were psychologically and mentally stable as revealed from the initial interview with the patients were considered eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- Females were excluded on purpose to prevent failures associated with osteoporosis and to avoid gender variability which definitely affects the results of patient satisfaction and OHIP.
- \. Patients requiring hard or, soft tissue grafting of the proposed implant sites.
- \. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes / day) or patients with para-functional habits like clenching or bruxism were excluded. This was important to decrease the risk of implant failure.
- \. Patients with temporo-mandibular joint disorders were considered ineligible because of the expected occlusal disturbances.
- \. Patients with systemic disease that might contra-indicate implants placement or affect osseointegration e.g. uncontrolled diabetes.
- \. Patients who took chemo-or radiotherapy or any drug that might counter-affect the healing process or the quality of bone.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry
Cairo, Manial, 12911, Egypt
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amira kheidr, masters
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amr El Khadem, phd
Cairo University
- STUDY CHAIR
Samira Ibrahim, phd
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Iman Radi, phd
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor of prosthodontics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2020
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
August 28, 2019
Last Updated
March 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share