Comparison of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the difference of postoperative analgesic effects and opioid consumption between ultrasound-guided unilateral oblique subcostal, posterior, or dual TAP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedJune 1, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.6 years
December 25, 2020
May 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 0th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is awake in postanesthesia care unit. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 0 hour
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 2nd hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 2 hours
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 4th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 4 hours
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 6th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 6 hours
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 8th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 8 hours
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 12th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 12 hours
postoperative pain intensity at rest and with motion
postoperative 24th hour Numerical Rating Scale measured on 0-10 ( 0= no pain, 10= the worst imaginable pain) when patient is on the ward. This outcome is compared between all three groups.
postoperative 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
postoperative opioid consumption
24 hours
postoperative dermatomal level of sensory block
24 hours
postoperative sedation
24 hours
postoperative nausea and vomiting
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
oblique subcostal tap block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound-guided right oblique subcostal TAP block with an anesthetic solution of %0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl (sodium chloride) 10ml and ultrasound-guided posterior TAP block with %0.9 NaCl 30ml
posterior tap block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound-guided right oblique subcostal TAP block with %0.9 NaCl 30ml and ultrasound-guided posterior TAP block with an anesthetic solution of %0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl 10ml
dual tap block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound-guided right oblique subcostal TAP block with %0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl 10ml and ultrasound-guided posterior TAP block with an anesthetic solution of %0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl 10ml
Interventions
In the supine position, after the skin sterilization, ultrasound with a high-frequency linear probe will be placed subcostally and from the xiphoid to the right iliac crest obliquely. The rectus abdominis and underlying transversus abdominis muscles will be identified. The local anesthetic solution (%0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl 10ml) will be injected after negative aspiration to the transversus abdominis plane between the rectus abdominis and transversus abdominis muscles along the oblique subcostal line.
In the supine position, after the skin sterilization, ultrasound with a high-frequency linear probe will be placed subcostally and from the xiphoid to the right iliac crest obliquely. %0.9 NaCl 30ml will be injected after negative aspiration to the transversus abdominis plane between the rectus abdominis and transversus abdominis muscles along the oblique subcostal line.
After the oblique subcostal TAP block, the operation table will be slightly turned left laterally for better visualization of the blocking area. The same high-frequency linear ultrasound (Esaote MyLab5) probe will be placed over the postero-lateral abdominal wall, posterior of the mid-axillary line between the costal margin and iliac crest. After the identification of the internal abdominis, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum muscles, the needle will be advanced into the transversus abdominis plane between the internal abdominis and transversus abdominis muscles, at the aponeurosis of quadratus lumborum and these muscles. The local anesthetic solution (%0.5 Bupivacaine 10ml + %1 Prilocaine 10ml + %0.9 NaCl 10ml) will be injected after negative aspiration.
After the oblique subcostal TAP block, the operation table will be slightly turned left laterally for better visualization of the blocking area. The same high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed over the postero-lateral abdominal wall, posterior of the mid-axillary line between the costal margin and iliac crest. After the identification of the internal abdominis, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum muscles, the needle will be advanced into the transversus abdominis plane between the internal abdominis and transversus abdominis muscles, at the aponeurosis of quadratus lumborum and these muscles. %0.9 NaCl 30ml will be injected after negative aspiration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Perforation of the gallbladder
- Patients with acute cholecystitis
- History of the previous gallbladder surgery
- Pregnancy
- Morbid obesity
- Psychiatric disorder
- Epilepsia
- Renal insufficiency
- Coagulopathy
- Patients known allergic to drugs used for study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ceylan Saygililead
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty General Surgery Operating Theater
Istanbul, Fatih, 34098, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (13)
Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R, Neugebauer E. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Surg Endosc. 1994 Feb;8(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00316616.
PMID: 8165491BACKGROUNDAlexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79(3):369-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.3.369. No abstract available.
PMID: 9389858BACKGROUNDWills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):273-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01374.x.
PMID: 10718794BACKGROUNDRafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11576144BACKGROUNDTsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao HY, Tai YT, Lin JA, Chen KY. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363. doi: 10.1155/2017/8284363. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PMID: 29226150BACKGROUNDHebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 18020088BACKGROUNDJankovic Z, Ahmad N, Ravishankar N, Archer F. Transversus abdominis plane block: how safe is it? Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1758-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181853619. No abstract available.
PMID: 18931248BACKGROUNDHebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):436-41. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181e66702.
PMID: 20830871BACKGROUNDCarney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Bergin D, Laffey JG, Mc Donnell JG. Studies on the spread of local anaesthetic solution in transversus abdominis plane blocks. Anaesthesia. 2011 Nov;66(11):1023-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06855.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
PMID: 21851346BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PMID: 23811424BACKGROUNDMcDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.03.011.
PMID: 17961838BACKGROUNDBhatia N, Arora S, Jyotsna W, Kaur G. Comparison of posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Jun;26(4):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.11.023. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PMID: 24882606BACKGROUNDKatz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9.
PMID: 10352653BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fatis Altındas, Prof. Dr.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY CHAIR
Emre S Erbabacan, Asc.Prof
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY CHAIR
Aylin Ozdilek, Asc.Prof
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY CHAIR
Cigdem Akyol Beyoglu, M.D.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ceylan Saygili, M.D.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 25, 2020
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
June 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make IPD (individual participant data) available to other researchers