Intra-articular PVA Hydrogel in Knee Osteoarthritis
Effects of PVA Hydrogel in Comparison With Synvisc-One®, in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group clinical investigation is aimed to assess the safety and the clinical performance over 6 months of a single intra-articular injection of PVA Hydrogel, novel polyvinyl alcohol preparation, as compared to hyalan G-F20, (Synvisc-One®) one of the most commonly used and best performing hyaluronic acid based products, in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthitis (OA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedJanuary 5, 2021
December 1, 2020
8 months
December 27, 2020
December 31, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adverse Events at the injection site (target knee)
patient reported symptom and/or investigator detected clinical sign
6 months
Adverse Device Events
AEs considered as related to the device and/or to the IA procedure.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Device Deficiencies
6 months
Adverse Events
6 months
Physical examination
6 months
Blood pressure
6 months
Pulse rate
6 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PVA Hydrogel
EXPERIMENTALPVA Hydrogel (Rottapharm Biotech, Monza): 2 mL prefilled syringe for intra-articular injection
Synvisc-One®
ACTIVE COMPARATORSynvisc-One® (Genzyme Corporation, Ridegield, New Jersey, USA): 6 mL prefilled syringe for intra-articular injection
Interventions
PVA Hydrogel will be supplied in 2 mL sterile and endotoxins-free pre-filled syringes containing a biocompatible polyvinyl alcohol crosslinked (PVA CL, main component) and buffered water for injections.
Synvisc One® (comparator) will be supplied in a 6 mL sterile and non-pyrogenic syringe containing containing Hylan polymers (hylan A + hylan B) (main component), sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate and water for injections.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated informed consent obtained before undergoing any clinical-investigation-related procedure.
- Male or female aged between 40 and 80 years.
- Documented diagnosis of primary OA of the knee, based on the clinical and radiological American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for knee OA:
- Knee pain,
- X-ray osteophytes,
- at least one of the following: (a) age \>50 years; (b) morning stiffness \<30 minutes in duration; (c) crepitus on active motion.
- Grade II-III according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification (X-ray evidence at enrolment or within the previous 12 months).
- Knee OA symptoms for at least six months.
- Failure to respond (i.e. did not respond sufficiently) to analgesics and/or regular NSAIDs, or proven intolerance to regular use of NSAIDs or to weak opioids analgesics.
You may not qualify if:
- Ability and willingness to communicate, participate, and comply with the requirements and scheduled procedures of the clinical investigation.
- (a) Medical history and Concomitant Diseases related criteria
- Presence of isolated or predominantly symptomatic patellofemoral OA of the knee (i.e. pain when climbing stairs or forcing the patient to extend his leg when sitting on a low sit).
- Presence of secondary osteoarthritis and/or other rheumatic diseases. In particular, history or presence of the following diseases should be excluded: septic arthritis, inflammatory joint disease, gout, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of bone, articular fracture, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemocromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis.
- Contralateral (i.e. non-target) knee pain \>3 on the NRS
- Any knee OA treatment for both knees (other than the clinical investigation viscosupplementation of the target knee) anticipated within the next 6 months.
- Presence of pain (any severity) in the ipsilateral and/or contralateral hip.
- Presence of disease of the spine or other lower extremity joints of sufficient severity to affect the clinical investigation assessments.
- Anterior cruciate ligament repair, reconstruction or injury in the target knee within the previous 3 years.
- Cartilage repair/surgery in the target knee within the previous 3 years.
- Any surgery in the lower limbs within the previous 12 months
- Any planned surgery of the lower limbs during the clinical investigation period.
- Significant articular deformities of the lower limbs, i.e. major dysplasia and congenital abnormalities.
- Presence of varus or valgus knee deformity ≥ 8°.
- History or presence of osteonecrosis in the lower limbs.
- +33 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
Świdnik, 21-040, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tomaz Blicharski
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne, Swidnik, Poland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Given the impossibility of obtaining identical presentations of the compared interventions, double-blind conditions will be ensured by appointing at each site one "injector investigator" in charge only of the administration of the treatments and one "clinical assessor investigator" as Outcome Assessor, in charge of all safety and efficacy assessments, who will remain always blinded to the treatment. Patient blinding will be ensured by avoiding visual access to the injection field by the use of a screen between the patient and his/her knee.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2020
First Posted
January 5, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
May 20, 2020
Study Completion
May 20, 2020
Last Updated
January 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share