NCT04691544

Brief Summary

Many patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) do not experience adequate symptom relief with current treatments. The pathophysiology of IBS is diverse, controversial and not completely understood. The next disruptive frontier would be to find a cure where the effect is predictable and lasting. The study groups phase 2 pilot trial was the first indication of a possible benefit from treating IBS with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) (Number needed to treat only five) (Fecal microbiota transplantation versus placebo for moderate-to-severe irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre trial he Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2018). Additional results from the same trial show that the treatment response may be predicted (unpublished data), and that the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind the treatment response also can be identified (Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome are mirrored by changes in gut microbiome, Gut Microbes 2020). This study is the first phase 3 trial of FMT for IBS worldwide. The hypothesis of the trial is that donor FMT is more effective than placebo FMT in treating IBS, with little adverse events or complications. Patients ≥18 years with IBS are enrolled at five Norwegian Hospitals in this double blind randomized, placebo controlled, parallell-group multi center trial. Participants are randomized to FMT from a healthy donor (intervention group), or their own feces (placebo group). The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with ≥75 points decrease in the Irritable bowel Symptom Severity score 90 days after treatment.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
450

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
8mo left

Started May 2021

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
May 2021Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 31, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2021

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

February 26, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

fecal microbiota therapybacteriotherapystool transplantIBSFMTgut microbiota brain axisfunctional disorderIBS-MIBS-DIBS-C

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion in the donorFMT (dFMT) versus autologousFMT (aFMT) group with ≥75 points decrease in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) day 90 after treatment when compared to the score 8 days before treatment

    Scores on the IBS-SSS can range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The IBS-SSS has five items. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (\>300) IBS. A decrease of 50 points is associated with a clinically meaningful improvement.

    Day 90 after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Proportion in dFMT versus aFMT group with ≥75 points decrease in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) day 365 after treatment when compared to the score 8 days before treatment

    Day 365 after treatment

  • Proportion of patients in dFMT versus aFMT group with a ≥14 points increase in the IBS-Qualiy of Life (IBS-QoL) day 90 after treatment when compared to the score 8 days before treatment

    Day 90 after treatment

  • Proportion in the dFMT vs aFMT group with 2 or more weeks with treatment success in Adequate relief by the Global Improvement Scale and Abdominal pain day 69, 76, 83 and 90 after treatment. For treatment success criteria A. and B. have to be fulfilled

    Day 69, 76, 83 and 90 after treatment

  • Proportion of adverse events and serious adverse events in the dFMT versus aFMT group from treatment and until day 90 after treatment

    Day 90 after treatment

  • Proportion of adverse events and serious adverse events in the dFMT versus aFMT group from treatment and until day 90 after treatment

    Day 365 after treatment

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in taxonomy and function of the microbiome, the immune system, metabolome and gut epithelial barrier in participants with vs without treatment success to dFMT and aFMT from before and until after treatment.

    8 days before treatment and until 90 and 365 days after treatment

  • Differences in taxonomy and function of the microbiome, the immune system, metabolome and gut epithelial barrier before treatment in FMT donors vs participants with vs without treatment success to dFMT and aFMT from before and until after treatment.

    8 days before treatment and until 90 and 365 days after treatment

Study Arms (4)

Fecal microbiota transplant from donor A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One FMT delivered by enema

Biological: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Fecal microbiota transplant from donor B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One FMT delivered by enema

Biological: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Fecal microbiota transplant from donor C

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One FMT delivered by enema

Biological: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Fecal microbiota transplant from autologous feces

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

One FMT delivered by enema

Biological: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Interventions

Delivered by enema

Fecal microbiota transplant from autologous fecesFecal microbiota transplant from donor AFecal microbiota transplant from donor BFecal microbiota transplant from donor C

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with IBS in the primary or secondary health care service
  • Aged 18-65 years with IBS defined by the Rome IV criteria:
  • Moderate to severe IBS symptoms, as defined by a score of ≥175 on the IBS-SSS
  • All participants \>50 years: Colonoscopy within the last 5 years prior to study entry including negative mucosal biopsy for microscopic colitis in participants subtyped as IBS-D

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned evaluations or examinations for bowel related complaints
  • Known presence of:
  • Endometriosis or polycystic ovarian syndrome
  • Diabetes type 1 and 2
  • Systemic disease including
  • Morbidly obesity (BMI ≥35)
  • Severe autoimmune disease
  • Severe immune deficiency (acquired, congenital or due to medication)
  • Previous treatment with FMT
  • History of:
  • Severe psychiatric disorder, alcohol or drug abuse. Mood disorders are allowed as long as there is no reason to believe that it will interfere with the ability to participate in the study.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, diverticulitis or ileus
  • Abdominal surgery, with the exception of appendectomy, cholecystectomy, caesarean section and hysterectomy
  • Malignant disease (excluding basalioma)
  • "Red flags'' indicating severe undiagnosed disease including:
  • +24 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ålesund Hospital

Ålesund, Norway

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Interventions

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colonic Diseases, FunctionalColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biological TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Peter H Johnsen, MD PhD

    Univeristy Hospital of North Norway

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rasmus Goll, MD PhD

    University Hospital of North Norway

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Triple blind randomized, placebo controlled, parallell-group multi center trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2020

First Posted

December 31, 2020

Study Start

May 5, 2021

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

February 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations