AntiCMV molécules Monitoring in Real-life in Stem Cell Recipients
NAViRe
Real-life Observatory of Efficacy and Resistance to Anti CMV Molecules in Stem Cell Recipients
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
16
Brief Summary
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous herpesvirus that represent a major cause of morbidity in haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) recipients, mostly through reactivation of the recipient's virus. If left untreated, 40 to 80% of patients will develop CMV infection, leading to CMV disease in 30 to 35 % patients, and associated with considerable morbi-mortality. Interstitial pneumonia is the most severe and specific manifestation, although CMV replication by itself has also indirect effects such as triggering graft versus host disease and increasing immunosuppression. The current burden of CMV infection increases by 25 to 30% the cost of the graft in France. This also includes the burden for refractory - infections, that represent up to 13% of recipients with CMV infection, including 3% of cases with virological resistance in France (data from the Reference Center cohorts). Ganciclovir, or valganciclovir preemptive treatment, guided by CMV viral load follow-up allowed significant reduction of CMV disease to 2-6% but did not prevent CMV indirect effects. In addition, hematotoxicity can compromise post-transplant haematological reconstitution, thus preventing its use as prophylaxis in France. Foscarnet, iv-administered and nephrotoxic, remains less used. There is thus a high expectation from less toxic molecules for prophylaxis The development letermovir recently available for prophylaxis of CMV infection in high risk patients will modify the patients care and follow-up. This new molecule targeting CMV terminases (developed by Merck) was recently marketed in France (Jan 2020). However, the analysis of the letermovir phase III study and further publications show that the risk of emergence of resistance is low, but may occur in case of breakthrough and thus post AMM monitoring is required. A "real-life" evaluation of these new molecules in terms of efficacy, emergence of resistance, tolerance and morbimortality related to CMV infection, is useful, to propose recommendations on management strategies, in particular for the most at-risk patients i.e. CMV-seropositive recipients. To this purpose, the National Reference Center in collaboration with the French Society for marrow graft and cell therapy (SFGMTC) set up a cohort of surveillance of allografted patients, receiving, in prevention or treatment, old and new molecules.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedDecember 15, 2025
September 1, 2020
5 years
September 14, 2020
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
between Day-30 and Day -8
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
between Day-8 and Day 0
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
at Day20
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
at Day100
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
at Day 200 (Month 6)
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
Month12
CMV infection according to criteria defined by the European EBMT group (Ljungman et al., 2017).
CMV detection (CMV DNAemia or antigen detection) in any body fluid or tissue specimen
Month24
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Uses of anti-CMV molecules : preemptive treatment
at Day200
Uses of anti-CMV molecules : prophylaxis
at Day200
Uses of anti-CMV molecules : curative treatment
at Day200
Uses of anti-CMV molecules
at Day200
Uses of anti-CMV molecules : preemptive treatment
at Month12
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Multicentric NAViRe cohort with biocollection
The National Reference Center (CNR) for cytomegalovirus with the French Society for Medullary Transplantation and Cell Therapy (SFGM-TC) has set up a surveillance cohort of allografted patients (NAViRe cohort) receiving, as prevention or treatment, Anti-Cytomegalovirus (Anti-CMV) molecules, "new or less recent", thus allowing the development of a new observatory evaluating in real life the potentials of these drugs in terms of efficacy, emergence of resistance, tolerance and morbidity and mortality associated with CMV infection.This work is useful to propose recommendations on management strategies, in particular for the most at-risk patients i.e. CMV-seropositive recipients and allows the emergence of an real-life observatory of efficacy and resistance to anti CMV molecules in stem cell recipients.
Interventions
Signing of consent at the time of the pre-transplant consultation (1 month before grafting). Inclusion of patients during conditioning (around D-8 of transplantation). Samples related to the cohort:one blood sample from the donor (only familial donors) for genetic SNPs analysis. 5 samples: D-8, D20, D100, D200 (+/-10 days), 1 year : 1 tube of 7ml of whole blood on EDTA: Biobanking of whole blood for genetic SNPs analysis (D-8) of specific transporters for GCV, and of plasma for TTV viral load at all times. In routine care:samples taken in the event of a therapeutic escape (2 x 7 ml EDTA tubes, for resistance genotype, and ganciclovir dosage, 3 x 1 ml for Quantiferon CMV, according to CNR Herpesvirus recommendations. 1 x Paxgene tube (2.5 ml) for subsequent CMV genomic and transcriptomic studies. Cell preservation plasma and whole blood for biocollection (2 tubes EDTA de 7ml). Samples stored by the centers' virology laboratories are periodically sent to the CNR for analysis.
Eligibility Criteria
Candidate (adult) for an allograft of hematopoietic stem cells for which a decision of transplant is made and willing to participate in the cohort.
You may qualify if:
- Candidate (adult) for an allograft of hematopoietic stem cells for which a decision of transplant is made and willing to participate in the cohort.
You may not qualify if:
- CMV-seronegative patient receiving a negative CMV donor graft ;
- Patient having signed the consent but not grafted ;
- Patient included in a clinical study on an anti-CMV molecule ;
- Non-insured social patient ;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (16)
CHU de LIMOGES
Limoges, Limoges, 87045, France
CHU
Amiens, France
CHU
Angers, France
CHU
Besançon, France
CHU
Bordeaux, France
CHU
Caen, France
CHU
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU
Grenoble, France
HCL
Lyon, France
CHU
Montpellier, France
CHU
Nancy, France
APHP
Paris, France
CHU
Poitiers, France
CHU
Rouen, France
CHU
Saint-Etienne, France
CHU
Strasbourg, France
Related Publications (7)
Ljungman P, Boeckh M, Hirsch HH, Josephson F, Lundgren J, Nichols G, Pikis A, Razonable RR, Miller V, Griffiths PD; Disease Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development Forum. Definitions of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients for Use in Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):87-91. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw668. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PMID: 27682069BACKGROUNDChemaly RF, Chou S, Einsele H, Griffiths P, Avery R, Razonable RR, Mullane KM, Kotton C, Lundgren J, Komatsu TE, Lischka P, Josephson F, Douglas CM, Umeh O, Miller V, Ljungman P; Resistant Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development Forum. Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(8):1420-1426. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy696.
PMID: 30137245BACKGROUNDBillat PA, Ossman T, Saint-Marcoux F, Essig M, Rerolle JP, Kamar N, Rostaing L, Kaminski H, Fabre G, Otyepka M, Woillard JB, Marquet P, Trouillas P, Picard N. Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4) controls ganciclovir intracellular accumulation and contributes to ganciclovir-induced neutropenia in renal transplant patients. Pharmacol Res. 2016 Sep;111:501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
PMID: 27402191BACKGROUNDMarty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, Maertens J, Dadwal SS, Duarte RF, Haider S, Ullmann AJ, Katayama Y, Brown J, Mullane KM, Boeckh M, Blumberg EA, Einsele H, Snydman DR, Kanda Y, DiNubile MJ, Teal VL, Wan H, Murata Y, Kartsonis NA, Leavitt RY, Badshah C. Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2433-2444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706640. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
PMID: 29211658BACKGROUNDRobin C, Hemery F, Dindorf C, Thillard J, Cabanne L, Redjoul R, Beckerich F, Rodriguez C, Pautas C, Toma A, Maury S, Durand-Zaleski I, Cordonnier C. Economic burden of preemptive treatment of CMV infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective study of 208 consecutive patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2854-2.
PMID: 29207952BACKGROUNDBillat PA, Woillard JB, Essig M, Sauvage FL, Picard N, Alain S, Neely M, Marquet P, Saint-Marcoux F. Plasma and intracellular exposure to ganciclovir in adult renal transplant recipients: is there an association with haematological toxicity? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Feb;71(2):484-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv342. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
PMID: 26538506RESULTKotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Huprikar S, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, Humar A; The Transplantation Society International CMV Consensus Group. The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018 Jun;102(6):900-931. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002191.
PMID: 29596116RESULT
Biospecimen
Samples related to the cohort : One blood sample from the donor (only familial donors) for genetic SNPs analysis. 5 samples: D-8 (conditioning), D20, D100 (+/- 10 days), D200 (+/- 10 days), 1 year : 1 tube of 7ml of whole blood on EDTA: Biobanking of whole blood for genetic SNPs analysis (D-8) of specific transporters for GCV, and of plasma for TTV viral load at all times. Conservation of viral load monitoring remnants at the center's virology laboratory.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal TURLURE
Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
December 31, 2020
Study Start
September 24, 2020
Primary Completion
September 24, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share