Intrathecal Nalbuphine is a Comparable Safer Alternative to Fentanyl for Intraoperative Pain Management During Uterine Exteriorization

NCT04689217 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: N- 26 / 2020
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 135
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In case of cesarean section (CS) delivery, spinal anesthesia is the best anesthetic choice. It is simple to perform with rapid onset of anesthesia and lower incidence of failed block. Spinal anesthesia avoids the risk of aspiration, the neonatal depressant effect that may occur with general anesthesia (GA), and provides postoperative analgesia, however, spinal anesthesia has a lesser control on the level of blockade, may give insufficient visceral pain block and may be associated with nausea and vomiting especially during peritoneal traction, closure and uterine manipulation, exteriorization and rotation. A previous study reported nausea and vomiting in up to 70.5% patients in the spinal group while the incidence of moderate to severe pain was more frequent in exteriorized uterus patients. Increasing the dosage of intrathecal local anesthetic may contribute to a decrease in the occurrence of intraoperative visceral pain, but at the cost of the risk and adverse effects of greater blockade.A variety of adjuvants have been used to prevent these disadvantages. The commonly used adjuvants include opioids; α2 stimulants such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine; NMDA receptor antagonist such as ketamine; GABA receptor agonists such as midazolam. The added intrathecal opioids as fentanyl and nalbuphine to local anesthetics give a sufficient intraoperative visceral analgesia when they were used in C.S., with less sympathetic block and hemodynamic effect, and reduces the need for intraoperative analgesics with prolongation of postoperative analgesia. Nalbuphine, a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid, has a potential to attenuate the mu-opioid effects and to enhance the kappa-opioid effects. It was synthesized attempting to produce analgesia without the undesirable side effects of mu agonist. Also, its combination with mu agonist opioids was tried by many researchers to decrease the incidence and severity of the common mu agonist side effects (respiratory depression, undesirable sedation, pruritus, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention), plus it can antagonize spinal induced shivering. Meanwhile, the benefits of both kappa and mu analgesia can be obtained. Few studies compared the effects of intrathecal nalbuphine (opioid agonist-antagonist) and fentanyl (opioid agonist) as adjuvants to bupivacaine in spinal blocked for CS with variable results. However, they didn't compare their ability to control the visceral pain aggravated by uterine exteriorization in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study will try to answer the question is nalbuphine effective enough in such scenario to be used routinely as a safer alternative to fentanyl, which is the opioid in common practice added to bupivacaine? Aim of the study: To compare the ability of the used doses in the study of intrathecal nalbuphine and intrathecal fentanyl to control the visceral pain aggravated by uterine exteriorization in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia Objectives:

• To evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) for visceral abdominal and shoulder pain every 5 minutes and the maximum score will be recorded for 30 minutes from the time of baby delivery.
• To calculate the total fentanyl used for VAS ⩾ 4

Conditions

Pain, Acute

Keywords

intrathecal nalbuphine; intrathecal fentanyl; exteriorization of the uterus; cesarean section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• intraoperative pain control

  \- The visual analog scale (VAS) for visceral abdominal pain in all groups after uterine exteriorization.VAS from 0 to 10 with 0 equal no pain and 10 equal the severist pain ever

  30 minutes after baby delivery

Study Arms (3)

Group F

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg)

Drug: intrathecal drug injection

Group N

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.8 mg nalbuphine hydrochloride

Drug: intrathecal drug injection

Group C

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

will receive intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml normal saline

Drug: intrathecal drug injection

Interventions

intrathecal drug injection DRUG

All patients will be put in the sitting position and lean forward. After sterilization, Dural puncture will be performed at L4-L5 interspace or L3-L4 with a 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle. The patients will be divided equally into 3 groups according to the additive (fentanyl, nalbuphine or placebo), and all patients will receive the local anesthetic dose of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine according to weight and height

Also known as: spinal opioid injection

Group C; Group F; Group N

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 45 Years
• Gender Eligibility Details: cesarean section patients
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• forty-two female patients
• ASA physical status I or II,
• age between 20 and 45 years,
• weight between 60 and 100 kg
• height between 160 and 180 cm

You may not qualify if:

• ASA III or IV,
• patient refusal,
• hypotensive patients,
• infection at the site of injection,
• coagulopathy
• weight \<60 and \> 100 kg,
• anticoagulant medications,
• pre-existing neurological disease.
• uncooperative patients,
• cardiac disorder
• respiratory disorder
• allergy to local anesthetics.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Cairo University hospitals

Cairo, Manial, 12511, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (4)

• Bogra J, Arora N, Srivastava P. Synergistic effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005 May 17;5(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-5-5.

  PMID: 15904498 BACKGROUND

• Gauchan S, Thapa C, Prasai A, Pyakurel K, Joshi I, Tulachan J. Effects of intrathecal fentanyl as an adjunct to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Nepal Med Coll J. 2014 Sep;16(1):5-8.

  PMID: 25799801 BACKGROUND

• Pedersen H, Santos AC, Steinberg ES, Schapiro HM, Harmon TW, Finster M. Incidence of visceral pain during cesarean section: the effect of varying doses of spinal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989 Jul;69(1):46-9.

  PMID: 2742167 BACKGROUND

• Alahuhta S, Kangas-Saarela T, Hollmen AI, Edstrom HH. Visceral pain during caesarean section under spinal and epidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Feb;34(2):95-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03050.x.

  PMID: 2407045 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Lecturer of anesthesia

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 26, 2020
• First Posted: December 30, 2020
• Study Start: January 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: April 25, 2021
• Study Completion: May 1, 2021
• Last Updated: May 4, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

EG (1)