Effect of VR on Anxiety and Pain in Gynecological Surgery
VRAP-G
The Effect of Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Pain in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery; a Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Lack of postoperative acute pain management is associated with increased morbidity, longer recovery time, more opioid use and subsequently increased health care costs. There is increasing evidence virtual reality (VR) is effective in the reduction of acute pain. Alternative methods to reduce postoperative pain and multimodal analgesia are necessary for acute postoperative pain management and to reduce opioid use and their adverse effects. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the effect of VR on pain in the immediate postoperative period after elective gynecological surgery. Secondary objectives are evaluating pre-and postoperative anxiety, pain catastrophizing, analgesic use, length of hospital stay between both groups and to explore tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use. Study design: The study concerns a non-blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Study population: Eligible women fulfill the inclusion criteria and receive elective gynecological surgery in the Zuyderland Medical Centre location Heerlen. Intervention: The study population will be randomly divided into the intervention group (VR-group) or the standard care- group. The intervention group can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience during the pre- and postoperative period additional to the usual standard care. The participants randomised to the standard care- group will receive only the usual standard care pre-and postoperative. Main study parameters: The primary outcome is postoperative pain measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS). A total of 30 patients have to be included in each group. This means that a total of 60 women will have to be included in the study. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The study population experiences a small medical risk when participating to this study. They can experience side-effects of VR for example dizziness or nausea and in rare cases epileptic insults. Participants of the study have to fill in a questionnaire before randomization and pre-and postoperative score of pain and anxiety on a zero to ten score scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2022
CompletedAugust 16, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.7 years
March 3, 2020
August 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS pain
reduction in postoperative pain score (NRS, numeric rating scale). Scaling from 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst imaginable pain
immediately after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (7)
STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) questionnaire (6 questions)
baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire
baseline
NRS anxiety
baseline and immediately after surgery
Analgesic use
Within 24-48hours after surgery
Length of hospital stay
within 24-48hours after surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VR-group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants randomised into this group can choose for an immersive guided relaxation VR experience or an interactive VR experience. The VR intervention is additional to the standard postoperative care management, the standard pain protocol is explained below. The VR-intervention will be given using the Oculus Go Virtual Reality glasses with touchpad.
Standard care-group
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants randomized into the standard care- group will receive the usual standard pre-and postoperative management. Standard pain protocol: 1. Preoperative (arrival day-care unit) start with 1000mg paracetamol orally administered. 2. Postoperative Meloxicam 15mg orally administered, or when oral medication is not possible (due to nausea e.g.) than diclofenac supp 100mg or diclofenac i.v. 75mg. 3. On recovery ward, when necessary depending on pain score (NRS\>4): dipidolor 2.5-5mg i.v. and 10-15mg i.m. after consulting the anesthesiologist. 4. Postoperative at home 4dd1000mg paracetamol will be continued, in combination with meloxicam 1dd15mg during 3 days. Also tramadol 50mg with a maximum of 4dd will be prescribed.
Interventions
Virtual reality in gynaecological surgery in the pre- and postoperative setting
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written and orally given informed consent
- years and older
- Native Dutch speaker
- Indication for elective gynecological surgery under spinal anesthesia
- No contra-indication to anesthesia:
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic pain patients; defined as 'persistent or recurrent pain lasting longer than 3 months' . The pain is not due to the gynecological problem.
- Chronical use of pain medication (opioids)
- History of prior opioid use defined as use within 8 to 90 days prior to the surgical procedure
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Known car sickness
- Epileptic insults in previous history
- Psychotically seizures in previous history
- Claustrophobic
- Blindness
- History of mental illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zuyderland Medical Centre
Heerlen, 6419PC, Netherlands
Related Publications (19)
Treede RD. The International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: as valid in 2018 as in 1979, but in need of regularly updated footnotes. Pain Rep. 2018 Mar 5;3(2):e643. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000643. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PMID: 29756089BACKGROUNDPopping DM, Zahn PK, Van Aken HK, Dasch B, Boche R, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Effectiveness and safety of postoperative pain management: a survey of 18 925 consecutive patients between 1998 and 2006 (2nd revision): a database analysis of prospectively raised data. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):832-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen300. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
PMID: 18945716BACKGROUNDGan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29026331BACKGROUNDJoshi GP, Ogunnaike BO. Consequences of inadequate postoperative pain relief and chronic persistent postoperative pain. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;23(1):21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.013.
PMID: 15763409BACKGROUNDMills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e273-e283. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 May 10.
PMID: 31079836BACKGROUNDZhao S, Chen F, Feng A, Han W, Zhang Y. Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies for Postoperative Opioid Abuse. Pain Res Manag. 2019 Jul 10;2019:7490801. doi: 10.1155/2019/7490801. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31360271BACKGROUNDMallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31308733BACKGROUNDSpiegel B, Fuller G, Lopez M, Dupuy T, Noah B, Howard A, Albert M, Tashjian V, Lam R, Ahn J, Dailey F, Rosen BT, Vrahas M, Little M, Garlich J, Dzubur E, IsHak W, Danovitch I. Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0219115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219115. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31412029BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ. Use of virtual reality for adjunctive treatment of adult burn pain during physical therapy: a controlled study. Clin J Pain. 2000 Sep;16(3):244-50. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200009000-00010.
PMID: 11014398BACKGROUNDDehghan F, Jalali R, Bashiri H. The effect of virtual reality technology on preoperative anxiety in children: a Solomon four-group randomized clinical trial. Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 Jun 4;8:5. doi: 10.1186/s13741-019-0116-0. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31171963BACKGROUNDJahaniShoorab N, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Nahvi A, Mazluom SR, Golmakani N, Talebi M, Pabarja F. The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain in Primiparity Women during Episiotomy Repair: A Randomize Clinical Trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2015 May;40(3):219-24.
PMID: 25999621BACKGROUNDLi A, Montano Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Pain Manag. 2011 Mar;1(2):147-157. doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15.
PMID: 21779307BACKGROUNDTreede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. No abstract available.
PMID: 25844555BACKGROUNDMarteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.
PMID: 1393159BACKGROUNDTashjian VC, Mosadeghi S, Howard AR, Lopez M, Dupuy T, Reid M, Martinez B, Ahmed S, Dailey F, Robbins K, Rosen B, Fuller G, Danovitch I, IsHak W, Spiegel B. Virtual Reality for Management of Pain in Hospitalized Patients: Results of a Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Mar 29;4(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/mental.7387.
PMID: 28356241BACKGROUNDMohammed MAA, Khalaf MH, Kesselman A, Wang DS, Kothary N. A Role for Virtual Reality in Planning Endovascular Procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jul;29(7):971-974. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.018.
PMID: 29935787BACKGROUNDMosadeghi S, Reid MW, Martinez B, Rosen BT, Spiegel BM. Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 27;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/mental.5801.
PMID: 27349654BACKGROUNDGarrett B, Taverner T, Masinde W, Gromala D, Shaw C, Negraeff M. A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in acute pain management in clinical practice. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1089-98. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000064.
PMID: 24535053BACKGROUNDTychsen L, Thio LL. Concern of Photosensitive Seizures Evoked by 3D Video Displays or Virtual Reality Headsets in Children: Current Perspective. Eye Brain. 2020 Feb 11;12:45-48. doi: 10.2147/EB.S233195. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32104130BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martine Wassen, Dr
Zuyderland Medical Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Drs
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2020
First Posted
December 29, 2020
Study Start
October 22, 2020
Primary Completion
July 8, 2022
Study Completion
July 9, 2022
Last Updated
August 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share