NCT04686097

Brief Summary

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of punctured electrocoagulation and sclerotherapy in the treatment of incompetent perforator veins.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
29mo left

Started Jan 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress70%
Jan 2021Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 28, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

December 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Perforating veinsVenous diseaseVenous ulcerSclerotherapyElectrocoagulationt

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • IPVs occlusion rate in the 12th month.

    IPVs occlusion rate is defined as DS \> 50% for each modality with no procedure no procedure performed on the treated segment

    12 months after operation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Quality of life scale survey results

    1-month,6-month,12-month

  • Skin ulcer recurrence rate

    1-month,6-month,12-month

  • Proportion of participants with deep venous Thrombosis

    1-month,6-month,12-month

  • Proportion of participants with hemorrhage

    1-month,6-month,12-month

  • All-cause mortality and other vascular events and serious complications.

    1-month,6-month,12-month

Study Arms (2)

experimental group (electrocoagulation)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the experimental group will receive ultrasound-guided puncture of coagulation incompetent perforator veins.

Procedure: treatment: puncture of coagulation

control group (sclerotherapy)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in the control group will receive an ultrasound-guided sclerosing agent injected.

Procedure: treatment: sclerosing agent injected

Interventions

ultrasound-guided puncture of coagulation

experimental group (electrocoagulation)

ultrasound-guided sclerosing agent injected

control group (sclerotherapy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (1) outward flow of less than 500 ms duration, with a diameter of \>3.5 mm; (2) According to the CEAP classification method specified by the International Venous Federation, patients with C4b\~C6 grades are included.

You may not qualify if:

  • (1)age \< 18 years or age \> 80 years; (2)with malignant tumors and life expectancy \< 1 year; (3)with past or current history of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in the lower extremities; (4)with congenital venous malformations (K-T syndrome, arteriovenous fistula and etc.; (5)inability to walk, long-term braking, restrictive bed rest; severe ischemia of lower extremities or diagnosed severity of peripheral artery occlusive disease; (6)according to the researcher's judgment, it is not suitable for foam hardener and puncture coagulation treatment; (7)allergic to the drugs and equipment materials involved in the research; (8)with inferior vena cava and/or iliac vein stenosis or occlusion; (9)with autoimmune disease, receiving chemotherapy, hormone therapy or immunomodulatory treatment; (10)other underlying severe diseases; women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or have pregnancy plans during the study period; (11)the patient cannot cooperate to complete the inspection and follow-up required by the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Anhui Provincial Hospital

Hefei, Anhui, 230000, China

SUSPENDED

Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital

Yantai, Shandong, 264000, China

SUSPENDED

Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China

SUSPENDED

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

SUSPENDED

The second affiliated hospital of zhejiang university school of medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Cooper DG, Hillman-Cooper CS, Barker SG, Hollingsworth SJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Jan;25(1):53-9. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1782.

    PMID: 12525812BACKGROUND
  • Sakurai T, Matsushita M, Nishikimi N, Nimura Y. Hemodynamic assessment of femoropopliteal venous reflux in patients with primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 1997 Aug;26(2):260-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70187-3.

    PMID: 9279313BACKGROUND
  • Guex JJ. Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (USGS) for perforating veins (PV). Hawaii Med J. 2000 Jun;59(6):261-2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10916243BACKGROUND
  • Masuda EM, Kessler DM, Lurie F, Puggioni A, Kistner RL, Eklof B. The effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;43(3):551-6; discussion 556-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.11.038.

    PMID: 16520171BACKGROUND
  • Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki ML, Lohr JM, McLafferty RB, Meissner MH, Murad MH, Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Passman MA, Raffetto JD, Vasquez MA, Wakefield TW; Society for Vascular Surgery; American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.079.

    PMID: 21536172BACKGROUND
  • Hager ES, Washington C, Steinmetz A, Wu T, Singh M, Dillavou E. Factors that influence perforator vein closure rates using radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, or foam sclerotherapy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Jan;4(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.08.004.

    PMID: 26946896BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Varicose Ulcer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Varicose VeinsVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Zhen jie Liu, MD,PhD

    Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2020

First Posted

December 28, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Locations