Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization With Stent
POST-PCI FLOW
1 other identifier
observational
5,100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD). With the presence of myocardial ischemia, PCI reduces the risks of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularization compared to medical therapy. However, the risk of future clinical events remains high, and about 10% of patients experienced further cardiovascular events after PCI. Several factors are associated with these poor outcomes. Well known patient-related risk factors are diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular dysfunction, previous MI, and presentation with the acute coronary syndrome. Procedure-related factors, such as stent underexpension, malapposition, edge dissection, the number of the used stent, and total stent length, are also related to poor prognosis after PCI. Recent studies reported that fractional flow reserve (FFR) after coronary stenting, or post PCI FFR, was associated with future clinical outcomes after PCI, and low post PCI FFR value was associated with procedural factors. However, optimal cut-off values of post-PCI FFR ranged widely, from 0.86 to 0.96, and some study reported the limited prognostic value of post-PCI FFR. This might result from differences in study populations, the definition of outcomes, type of stent used, and distribution of included vessels among previous studies. To establish the clinical relevance of post-PCI FFR and to evaluate the useful cut-off value of post-PCI FFR in daily practice, investigators planned to incorporate all previous evidence of post-PCI FFR by collaboration with international researchers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2021
CompletedFebruary 26, 2021
February 1, 2021
10 months
December 22, 2020
February 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Target vessel failure
A composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cardiac death or myocardial infarction
2 years
Target vessel myocardial infarction
2 years
Target vessel revascularization
2 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Cut-off value of post-PCI FFR
2 years
Study Arms (1)
Post PCI state
The study population of this study underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) and measured fractional flow reserve after PCI.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who were diagnosed as obstructive coronary artery disease and treated by DES and measured post PCI FFR after PCI.
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bon-Kwon Koolead
- Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Koreacollaborator
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Chinacollaborator
- Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospitalcollaborator
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, TX, USAcollaborator
- Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japancollaborator
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Schoolcollaborator
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgiumcollaborator
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italycollaborator
- Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Koreacollaborator
- University of Cincinnaticollaborator
- Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japancollaborator
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Koreacollaborator
- Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japancollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Select, 03080, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
PMID: 30165437BACKGROUNDFearon WF, Nishi T, De Bruyne B, Boothroyd DB, Barbato E, Tonino P, Juni P, Pijls NHJ, Hlatky MA; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
PMID: 29097450BACKGROUNDHwang D, Lee JM, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Nam CW, Hahn JY, Shin ES, Matsuo A, Tanaka N, Matsuo H, Lee SY, Doh JH, Koo BK. Influence of target vessel on prognostic relevance of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting. EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 29;15(5):457-464. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00913.
PMID: 30561367BACKGROUNDLi SJ, Ge Z, Kan J, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Kwan TW, Santoso T, Yang S, Sheiban I, Qian XS, Tian NL, Rab TS, Tao L, Chen SL. Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):986-995. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
PMID: 28456699BACKGROUNDRimac G, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Ikeno F, Matsuo H, Piroth Z, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF. Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2017 Jan;183:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PMID: 27979031BACKGROUNDvan Zandvoort LJC, Masdjedi K, Witberg K, Ligthart J, Tovar Forero MN, Diletti R, Lemmert ME, Wilschut J, de Jaegere PPT, Boersma E, Zijlstra F, Van Mieghem NM, Daemen J. Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007030. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007030.
PMID: 30732469BACKGROUNDChoi KH, Kwon W, Shin D, Lee SH, Hwang D, Zhang J, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Chen SL, Kakuta T, Toth GG, Piroth Z, Hakeem A, Uretsky BF, Hokama Y, Tanaka N, Lim HS, Ito T, Matsuo A, Azzalini L, Leesar MA, Daemen J, Collison D, Collet C, De Bruyne B, Koo BK, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Lee JM. Differential Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured After Coronary Stent Implantation by Left Ventricular Dysfunction. JACC Asia. 2023 Dec 12;4(3):229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.10.009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PMID: 38463680DERIVEDYang S, Hwang D, Zhang J, Park J, Yun JP, Lee JM, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Chen SL, Kakuta T, Toth GG, Piroth Z, Johnson NP, Hakeem A, Uretsky BF, Hokama Y, Tanaka N, Lim HS, Ito T, Matsuo A, Azzalini L, Leesar MA, Neleman T, van Mieghem NM, Diletti R, Daemen J, Collison D, Collet C, De Bruyne B, Koo BK. Clinical and Vessel Characteristics Associated With Hard Outcomes After PCI and Their Combined Prognostic Implications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e030572. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030572. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
PMID: 37642032DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD
Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joon Hyung MD, PhD, MD, PhD
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shao-Liang Chen, MD
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tsunekazu Kakuta, MD, PhD
Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nils P. Johnson, MD, MS
McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, TX, USA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tsuyoshi Ito, MD
Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Hakeem, MD
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorenzo Azzalini, MD, PhD
San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hong-Seok Lim, MD, PhD
Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Massoud A. Leesar, MD, PhD, MSc
University of Cincinnati
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Akiko Matsuo, MD
Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nobuhiro Tanaka, MD, PhD, MSc
Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joo Myung Lee, MD, PhD, MSc
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2020
First Posted
December 24, 2020
Study Start
May 16, 2020
Primary Completion
February 28, 2021
Study Completion
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
February 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02